The Berean Table

Field	Detail
Pericope	Acts 8:1–40
Theme	The sovereign God turns persecution into gospel advance, carrying the word of Christ beyond Jerusalem to despised Samaria and to an outcast Gentile — while exposing counterfeit faith and revealing the crucified Servant of Isaiah 53 as the heart of Scripture

---

Opening Prayer

---

Closing Prayer

---

Timeline Context

Acts 8 stands at a decisive hinge in Luke’s narrative. The risen Christ had commissioned the apostles: “you will be my witnesses in Jerusalem and in all Judea and Samaria, and to the end of the earth” (Acts 1:8). Chapters 1–7 covered the witness in Jerusalem; the martyrdom of Stephen (Acts 6–7) closes that phase. Acts 8 launches the second: the gospel goes to Judea and Samaria, precisely fulfilling the Lord’s programmatic word.

Historically, the events fall in the early-to-mid A.D. 30s, within a few years of Pentecost. The great persecution (Acts 8:1) breaks out in Jerusalem under the hostility of the Sanhedrin, with Saul of Tarsus (later Paul) as a leading agent, “ravaging the church” (Acts 8:3). Judea and Samaria were adjacent regions; Samaria proper had been a center of the Samaritan people, descendants of the mixed population settled after the fall of the northern kingdom (2 Kings 17), estranged from the Jews for centuries over the temple, the Pentateuch, and worship on Mount Gerizim (John 4:9, 20). For a Jew to preach Christ to Samaritans was to cross a deep and bitter ethnic-religious divide.

The chapter’s second half moves to the desert road to Gaza and introduces an Ethiopian eunuch, a court official of Candace (a dynastic title for the queen of the kingdom of Meroë in Nubia, south of Egypt). He is a God-fearing Gentile who had traveled to Jerusalem “to worship,” yet as a eunuch he was, under the letter of the law, excluded from the full assembly (Deuteronomy 23:1). His conversion anticipates the wider ingathering of the Gentiles (Acts 10; 15) and the fulfillment of Isaiah 56:3–5, where the Lord promises the eunuch “a name better than sons and daughters.”

Redemptive-historically, Acts 8 shows the sovereign God overruling the malice of men so that “those who were scattered went about preaching the word” (Acts 8:4). The very effort to crush the church becomes the means of its expansion, and the gospel begins its centrifugal movement toward “the end of the earth.”

---

Historical-Grammatical Study

Genre. Acts is inspired historical narrative — Luke’s “orderly account” (Luke 1:3) of the acts of the risen Christ through His Spirit and apostles. The narrative is theological history: Luke selects and arranges events to display the unstoppable advance of the word of God (Acts 6:7; 12:24; 19:20).

Key Greek terms and syntax.

• diaspeirō (διασπείρω), “scattered” (Acts 8:1, 4): the same root as diaspora; the verb evokes sowing seed. The scattering of the church is, providentially, a scattering of gospel seed.
• euangelizomenoi ton logon (εὐαγγελιζόμενοι τὸν λόγον), “preaching the word” (Acts 8:4): the scattered believers — not the apostles — proclaim the good news, showing gospel witness as the calling of the whole church.
• ekēryssen ton Christon (Acts 8:5), “proclaimed the Christ”: Philip’s message is Christ Himself, the Messiah, the content of Samaritan hope (John 4:25).
• episteusan (ἐπίστευσαν), “believed” (Acts 8:12, 13): used both of the true converts and of Simon, whose later exposure raises the question of the nature of his “faith.”
• dōrea tou theou (δωρεὰ τοῦ θεοῦ), “the gift of God” (Acts 8:20): the Holy Spirit is a free gift; Simon’s attempt to buy it gives us the word simony.
• he kardia sou ouk estin eutheia (Acts 8:21), “your heart is not right”: eutheia, “straight/upright”; the diagnosis is of the inner man, not mere outward act.
• eis cholēn pikrias (Acts 8:23), “in the gall of bitterness,” and syndesmon adikias, “the bond of iniquity”: Old Testament idioms (Deuteronomy 29:18; Isaiah 58:6) describing a state of unregenerate enmity and enslavement to sin.
• eunouchos (εὐνοῦχος), “eunuch” (Acts 8:27): a castrated court official; the term carries both his office and his exclusion under Deuteronomy 23:1.

First-century background. The Samaritans accepted only the Pentateuch and awaited a Messiah (the Taheb); their reception of “the Christ” (Acts 8:5) is momentous. Magic (mageia, Acts 8:11) was widespread; Simon’s self-exaltation as “the power of God that is called Great” (Acts 8:10) reflects a syncretistic religious environment. The eunuch’s scroll of Isaiah shows the reach of the Greek Scriptures (the passage quoted, Acts 8:32–33, follows the Septuagint of Isaiah 53:7–8).

Covenantal themes. The chapter enacts the Abrahamic promise that in the offspring of Abraham “all the nations of the earth shall be blessed” (Genesis 22:18). The barriers of the old order — Samaritan estrangement, the eunuch’s ceremonial exclusion — begin to fall as the new covenant gospel goes forth. The Servant of Isaiah 53, silently slain, is revealed as the ground of this ingathering.

---

Expanded Outline

Section 1 — Saul’s Persecution and the Scattering of the Church (Acts 8:1–3)

Key Insight

The chapter opens with a chilling notice: “Saul approved of his execution” (Acts 8:1), tying the stoning of Stephen (Acts 7:58–60) to the man who will become the apostle to the Gentiles. On the very day of Stephen’s death “there arose… a great persecution against the church in Jerusalem, and they were all scattered throughout the regions of Judea and Samaria, except the apostles” (Acts 8:1). Luke’s geography is deliberate: Judea and Samaria are the next stages of Acts 1:8. What men intend for destruction, God ordains for advance. The verb “scattered” (diaspeirō) carries the image of sowing seed; as Tertullian would later say, “the blood of the martyrs is the seed of the church.” Matthew Henry observes that “the enemies of the church, by seeking to destroy it, unwittingly enlarged it,” for persecution “was the occasion of scattering those who scattered the gospel.” Meanwhile “devout men buried Stephen and made great lamentation over him” (Acts 8:2) — a note of covenant tenderness and honor for the first martyr, and a quiet rebuke to those who thought his death a triumph. Then Luke fixes our eyes on Saul: “But Saul was ravaging the church, and entering house after house, he dragged off men and women and committed them to prison” (Acts 8:3). The verb “ravaging” (elymaineto) was used of wild beasts tearing prey and of armies laying waste a land; it depicts savage, systematic violence against Christ’s flock, sparing neither “men and women.” Calvin marvels that God “was pleased to make use of so cruel an enemy” and to convert “the wolf into a shepherd.” The scene is sovereignly Christological: the persecuted are members of Christ’s body, so that when Saul is later confronted, the risen Lord asks, “Saul, Saul, why are you persecuting me?” (Acts 9:4). To touch the church is to touch the Head. Here at the outset, Luke sets the theology of the whole chapter: the God who reigns over the fury of men bends even the malice of a persecutor to serve the spread of the gospel and the glory of His Son.

Application

This passage teaches believers to interpret suffering and opposition through the lens of God’s sovereignty. The scattering that felt like catastrophe was the means by which the gospel reached new regions. When persecution, loss, or upheaval disrupts our lives and churches, we are called to trust that “for those who love God all things work together for good” (Romans 8:28). The scattered believers did not despair; they preached (Acts 8:4). Their example rebukes any notion that gospel witness belongs only to professionals; every displaced saint became a missionary. Practically, when God dismantles our comfortable arrangements, we should ask not merely “How do I get back to normal?” but “What is God spreading through this?” Beware two misapplications. First, this is no license to court persecution or to romanticize suffering; the church did not seek harm but endured it. Second, do not read every hardship as guaranteed to produce visible good on our timetable; the point is God’s sure sovereignty, not our ability to trace it. Finally, Saul’s presence at the head of the persecution should stir hope for the salvation of our fiercest opponents. The chief persecutor became the chief apostle. No enemy of Christ is beyond the reach of sovereign grace, so we pray for and love even those who oppose us (Matthew 5:44).

---

Section 2 — Philip Preaches Christ in Samaria (Acts 8:4–8)

Key Insight

“Now those who were scattered went about preaching the word” (Acts 8:4). The narrative zooms in on Philip — not the apostle but one of the seven deacons appointed in Acts 6:5, later called “Philip the evangelist” (Acts 21:8). “Philip went down to the city of Samaria and proclaimed to them the Christ” (Acts 8:5). The verb “proclaimed” (ekēryssen, from kēryssō, to herald) and the object “the Christ” define the mission: not moral advice or religious novelty, but the announcement that Jesus is the promised Messiah. That a Jew would preach to Samaritans — the estranged, despised half-brothers of Israel (John 4:9) — is itself a gospel wonder, fulfilling Jesus’ own foreshadowing at Sychar (John 4). “The crowds with one accord paid attention to what was being said by Philip, when they heard him and saw the signs that he did” (Acts 8:6). The signs — exorcisms and healings, “unclean spirits, crying out with a loud voice, came out of many… and many who were paralyzed or lame were healed” (Acts 8:7) — authenticated the message as the works of the Messiah (Matthew 11:4–5; Isaiah 35:5–6). They demonstrate the in-breaking of the kingdom, the binding of the strong man (Matthew 12:28–29). The result is striking: “So there was much joy in that city” (Acts 8:8). Where Samaria had long lain under the tyranny of demons and the false claims of magic (Acts 8:9–11), the coming of Christ brings deliverance and joy. R.C. Sproul notes that the church’s mission is essentially “kerygmatic” — a heralding of Christ crucified and risen — and here Philip models it. Calvin remarks that Philip “did not obtrude himself rashly” but was thrust out by God’s providence, and that the fruit shows “the wonderful power of the gospel” among a people long divided from the Jews. Matthew Henry observes that “the gospel triumphs over Satan’s kingdom,” and that the joy of Samaria is “the fruit of the preaching of Christ.” Redemptive-historically, the reception of the word by Samaria is a firstfruits of the nations, the reversal of Babel’s scattering (Genesis 11) as the one gospel gathers a divided humanity to the one Christ.

Application

Philip’s example calls every displaced, ordinary believer to gospel witness. He was a deacon, not an apostle, yet he “proclaimed the Christ.” The church’s mission is not the preserve of a clerical elite; wherever God scatters us — a new job, a new city, exile, or hardship — we go “preaching the word” (Acts 8:4). Note the content: Philip proclaimed not himself, not a program, but Christ. Our witness must be Christ-centered, heralding the crucified and risen Lord, not merely offering therapeutic tips or moral improvement. Note also the courage to cross barriers: Philip carried the gospel to a people his culture despised. We are summoned past our prejudices — of race, class, and history — to bring Christ to those our world has written off. The joy of Samaria (Acts 8:8) reminds us that the gospel is genuinely good news; where Christ is truly received, there is deliverance and gladness, not mere religious burden. Beware misapplication: the “signs” served to authenticate the apostolic-era message and the arrival of the kingdom; we should not make dramatic wonders the measure of gospel success, nor despise the ordinary means of preaching, prayer, and the Word by which Christ still saves. The abiding call is to herald Christ boldly across every human divide and to expect that where He is proclaimed, joy follows.

---

Section 3 — Simon the Magician Believes and Is Baptized (Acts 8:9–13)

Key Insight

Luke now introduces a shadow across the bright scene: “there was a man named Simon, who had previously practiced magic in the city and amazed the people of Samaria, saying that he himself was somebody great” (Acts 8:9). Simon was a religious celebrity, and his self-promotion had won total allegiance: “They all paid attention to him, from the least to the greatest, saying, ‘This man is the power of God that is called Great’” (Acts 8:10). The Samaritans had ascribed to Simon a title verging on the divine; “they paid attention to him because for a long time he had amazed them with his magic” (Acts 8:11). The repeated word “amazed” (existanō) marks Simon’s ministry — he trafficked in astonishment. Then comes the turn: “But when they believed Philip as he preached good news about the kingdom of God and the name of Jesus Christ, they were baptized, both men and women” (Acts 8:12). The gospel of the kingdom and the name of Jesus eclipses the magician’s power. Most remarkably, “Even Simon himself believed, and after being baptized he continued with Philip. And seeing signs and great miracles performed, he was amazed” (Acts 8:13). Here is one of Scripture’s sober warnings. Simon “believed” and was baptized — outwardly he entered the church — yet the sequel (Acts 8:18–23) will reveal his heart “not right before God” and still “in the bond of iniquity.” The clue is already given: the man who amazed others is now himself “amazed” (existato), fixated on the power of the signs rather than on the Christ they signified. Calvin comments that Simon’s faith was “a certain temporary faith” that “vanished away,” and that “there was in him some seed of faith, but corrupted.” Matthew Henry notes that “Simon Magus was a monument of the deceitfulness of the heart,” believing “with a faith that was only historical and temporary.” The passage thus distinguishes between an outward profession that even receives the sign of baptism, and the inward, saving reception of Christ. Philip, judging by profession, rightly baptized him; only God searches the heart (1 Samuel 16:7). Christologically, the scene magnifies Christ over every counterfeit “power”: the name of Jesus, not the magic of Simon, is the true and saving power of God (Romans 1:16; 1 Corinthians 1:24).

Application

Simon’s story is a mirror for self-examination. It is possible to “believe,” be baptized, join the church, and remain “in the bond of iniquity” (Acts 8:23). We must therefore ask what our faith rests upon. Simon was drawn by amazement at power; is our religion, too, a fascination with what God can do for us — blessing, experience, excitement — rather than a surrender to who Christ is? The warning is not meant to unsettle the humble believer but to expose the presumptuous one. Practically, this passage cautions the church against measuring conversion merely by outward markers. A profession of faith and a baptism are proper and to be honored, yet they are not infallible proofs of regeneration; the fruit will tell (Matthew 7:16). It also warns against the cult of religious celebrity. Simon had made himself “somebody great” (Acts 8:9), and the crowds followed the spectacle. The church must beware leaders who traffic in amazement and self-exaltation, and beware our own hunger for such spectacle. Beware two misapplications: do not use Simon to doubt every convert’s sincerity, nor to deny that baptism truly signifies covenant membership. The right use is to press the question inward — “Examine yourselves, to see whether you are in the faith” (2 Corinthians 13:5) — and to rest our hope not on having once believed and been baptized, but on the living Christ Himself, whose Spirit produces enduring fruit.

---

Section 4 — Peter and John and the Gift of the Spirit (Acts 8:14–17)

Key Insight

News of the Samaritan mission reaches headquarters: “when the apostles at Jerusalem heard that Samaria had received the word of God, they sent to them Peter and John” (Acts 8:14). The sending of Peter and John — the very apostles who, with Christ, had once wished to call down fire on a Samaritan village (Luke 9:51–56) — is itself remarkable; now they come not with fire but with the Spirit. “They… came down and prayed for them that they might receive the Holy Spirit, for he had not yet fallen on any of them, but they had only been baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus. Then they laid their hands on them and they received the Holy Spirit” (Acts 8:15–17). This delay between belief-and-baptism and the reception of the Spirit is unusual in Acts and has occasioned much discussion. The best Reformed reading sees it as a unique, transitional event in redemptive history, not a normal pattern. The gospel is crossing the deepest divide in Israel — Jew and Samaritan — and God ordains that the Samaritan believers receive the Spirit through the ministry of the Jerusalem apostles, so that the unity of the one church is publicly established and no rival “Samaritan Christianity” arises apart from apostolic fellowship. As John Stott and others observe, the deferral safeguards the oneness of the body of Christ; the Samaritans are not a second-class church but are joined to the apostolic church founded at Pentecost. The laying on of hands signifies solidarity and blessing, and here mediates the Spirit’s coming as an outward, attested event that binds Samaria to Jerusalem. Calvin cautions against building a doctrine of two-stage Christian experience on this passage, noting its extraordinary character; the normal New Testament pattern is that the Spirit is given to all who believe (Acts 2:38; Romans 8:9; Ephesians 1:13). Christologically, it is the exalted Christ who pours out the Spirit He received from the Father (Acts 2:33); the Spirit is the seal of union with Christ, now visibly extended to the once-excluded Samaritans. The scene thus proclaims that there is one Lord, one faith, one baptism, one Spirit, and one church, embracing Jew and Samaritan alike (Ephesians 4:4–6).

Application

This passage teaches us to prize the unity of Christ’s church across every historic and cultural divide. God went to visible lengths to bind Samaria to Jerusalem, refusing to let the gospel produce fragmented, competing Christianities. We are called to guard “the unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace” (Ephesians 4:3), rejecting tribalism that would make our congregation, denomination, or ethnic group a self-contained kingdom. The apostles who once wanted fire for Samaria now bring the Spirit; genuine transformation replaces enmity with fellowship, and we should expect the gospel to reconcile former antagonists. Practically, we should welcome and validate new believers from unexpected quarters, sending our best to serve them rather than holding them at arm’s length. Beware misapplication. This text should not be used to teach a normative “second blessing” experience in which Spirit-baptism follows conversion as a separate stage; the passage is transitional and unique, and the ordinary promise is that all who trust Christ receive the Spirit (Acts 2:38–39; Romans 8:9). Nor should the laying on of hands be treated as a magical conduit, as Simon will wrongly assume. The abiding lesson is that the one Spirit unites the whole church to the one Christ; we therefore labor for unity, honor the fellowship of the wider body, and rejoice that no repentant sinner is a second-class citizen in the kingdom of God.

---

Section 5 — Simon Rebuked: “Your Heart Is Not Right Before God” (Acts 8:18–25)

Key Insight

Simon’s true heart now surfaces. “When Simon saw that the Spirit was given through the laying on of the apostles’ hands, he offered them money, saying, ‘Give me this power also, so that anyone on whom I lay my hands may receive the Holy Spirit’” (Acts 8:18–19). The former magician, still thinking in the categories of purchasable power, tries to buy the divine gift — an act so notorious it gave the church the word simony, the sin of trafficking in holy things. Peter’s response is thunderous: “May your silver perish with you, because you thought you could obtain the gift of God with money!” (Acts 8:20). The rebuke exposes a double error — treating the Spirit as a commodity and the self as its rightful purchaser. “You have neither part nor lot in this matter, for your heart is not right before God” (Acts 8:21). The diagnosis pierces beneath the act to the man: his kardia is “not right” (eutheia, straight). Peter then calls him to the only remedy: “Repent, therefore, of this wickedness of yours, and pray to the Lord that, if possible, the intent of your heart may be forgiven you” (Acts 8:22). The tentative “if possible” does not doubt God’s mercy but presses the gravity of Simon’s state and the necessity of genuine repentance. “For I see that you are in the gall of bitterness and in the bond of iniquity” (Acts 8:23) — Old Testament language (Deuteronomy 29:18; Isaiah 58:6) for one still unregenerate, enslaved to sin. Simon’s reply is telling: “Pray for me to the Lord, that nothing of what you have said may come upon me” (Acts 8:24). He fears the consequences but shows no brokenness over the sin itself — the sorrow of the world, not repentance unto life (2 Corinthians 7:10). Calvin observes that Simon “was afraid of punishment, but did not hate his sin,” and Matthew Henry notes he “would be prayed for, but would not pray for himself,” betraying an unhumbled heart. The section closes: “when they had testified and spoken the word of the Lord, they returned to Jerusalem, preaching the gospel to many villages of the Samaritans” (Acts 8:25). Even Peter and John, once wanting fire for Samaria, now sow the gospel through her villages. Christologically, the passage exalts the free grace of God: the gift of God cannot be bought (Isaiah 55:1; Romans 6:23), for it was purchased by the priceless blood of Christ (1 Peter 1:18–19), and it is received only by repentance and faith, never by silver.

Application

Simon’s sin warns against every attempt to commodify God’s grace. We cannot purchase, earn, or manipulate the gifts of God; they are freely given in Christ or not at all (Ephesians 2:8–9). This confronts the perennial temptation to treat God as a vending machine — offering our religious “payments” (church attendance, giving, moral effort) to extract His favor or power. Grace bought is grace denied; the gospel is “without money and without price” (Isaiah 55:1). The passage also presses the difference between true and false repentance. Simon feared the penalty but did not grieve the sin; he wanted Peter to pray so that judgment might pass him by, but would not himself turn to God in brokenness. We must examine our own repentance: do we hate our sin, or merely dread its consequences? “Godly grief produces a repentance that leads to salvation… but worldly grief produces death” (2 Corinthians 7:10). Peter’s bold rebuke also models faithful pastoral confrontation: love speaks plainly to the presumptuous, naming sin and calling for repentance. Beware misapplication: Peter’s severity toward a hardened, presumptuous heart is not a warrant for harshness toward the broken and contrite, whom Christ never casts out (John 6:37; Isaiah 42:3). The abiding call is to rest in the free grace of God, to repent thoroughly and not merely to fear judgment, and to cherish the gift of the Spirit as beyond all price because it flows from the priceless cross of Christ.

---

Section 6 — Philip and the Ethiopian Eunuch: The Suffering Servant Proclaimed (Acts 8:26–40)

Key Insight

The scene shifts from the crowds of Samaria to a single soul on a desert road. “An angel of the Lord said to Philip, ‘Rise and go toward the south to the road that goes down from Jerusalem to Gaza’” (Acts 8:26). Philip obeys without hesitation — “he rose and went” — and God’s sovereign orchestration unfolds. There he meets “an Ethiopian, a eunuch, a court official of Candace, queen of the Ethiopians, who was in charge of all her treasure” (Acts 8:27). This man is triply marginal: a Gentile from the far south, a eunuch excluded from the assembly by the letter of the law (Deuteronomy 23:1), yet a God-fearer who “had come to Jerusalem to worship” (Acts 8:27). Providentially, he is “reading the prophet Isaiah” (Acts 8:28), and “the Spirit said to Philip, ‘Go over and join this chariot’” (Acts 8:29). Philip’s question models evangelistic wisdom: “Do you understand what you are reading?” The eunuch’s humble reply — “How can I, unless someone guides me?” (Acts 8:31) — confesses the need for a Spirit-given interpreter of Scripture (Luke 24:45; 1 Corinthians 2:14). The passage he reads is the heart of the gospel: “Like a sheep he was led to the slaughter and like a lamb before its shearer is silent, so he opens not his mouth. In his humiliation justice was denied him…” (Acts 8:32–33, quoting Isaiah 53:7–8). The eunuch asks the pivotal question: “About whom… does the prophet say this, about himself or about someone else?” (Acts 8:34). “Then Philip opened his mouth, and beginning with this Scripture he told him the good news about Jesus” (Acts 8:35). Here Luke gives us a model of Christ-centered interpretation: Isaiah 53 is about Jesus, the Suffering Servant, silently slain for sinners — exactly as Christ Himself taught (Luke 24:27, 44). Faith comes; the eunuch sees water and asks, “What prevents me from being baptized?” (Acts 8:36) — a poignant question from a man long “prevented” by his exclusions, now welcomed in Christ. He is baptized, “and when they came up out of the water, the Spirit of the Lord carried Philip away, and the eunuch saw him no more, and went on his way rejoicing” (Acts 8:39). Philip is found at Azotus, “preaching the gospel to all the towns until he came to Caesarea” (Acts 8:40). The account fulfills Isaiah 56:3–5, where the Lord promises the eunuch and the foreigner “a name better than sons and daughters.” Calvin marvels that “God stretched out His hand from heaven” to save this outcast; Matthew Henry notes that “the eunuch was reading, and Philip was sent to expound,” a picture of Word and ministry joined. The whole scene is gloriously Christological: Christ is the Lamb led to the slaughter, and the gospel of His humiliation opens heaven to the ends of the earth.

Application

This narrative summons us to Spirit-led obedience and Christ-centered witness. Philip went to a “desert place” on nothing but God’s word, and God had prepared a soul. We should hold our plans loosely and obey God’s promptings, trusting that He goes before us to prepare hearts. The eunuch’s honesty — “How can I, unless someone guides me?” — reminds us that people are often more ready to hear than we assume; a simple, respectful question (“Do you understand?”) can open a soul. Note the method: Philip began “with this Scripture” and “told him the good news about Jesus” (Acts 8:35). Our task is to open the Bible and show Christ; all Scripture, rightly read, testifies of Him (John 5:39; Luke 24:27). This also assaults every barrier of exclusion. The eunuch, barred by the old order, is fully received — the gospel welcomes the outcast, the ashamed, the “prevented.” No one is too marginal for Christ. The eunuch’s response — he “went on his way rejoicing” (Acts 8:39) — shows the true fruit of receiving Christ: joy that goes with us into ordinary life. Beware misapplication: this is no formula guaranteeing every witness such swift success, nor a warrant to bypass careful teaching; Philip taught, then baptized upon confession of faith. The abiding call is to obey God’s leading, to interpret all Scripture as pointing to the crucified and risen Christ, to welcome the outsider, and to expect that those who find the Lamb of Isaiah 53 will go on their way rejoicing.

---

Cross References

Comparative Gospel Study

Not Applicable as Direct Comparison — Acts is New Testament historical narrative, not Gospel narrative. However, Acts 8 develops key Gospel themes:

First, Acts 8 fulfills the Great Commission given at the close of the Gospels. Matthew records Christ’s command to “make disciples of all nations” (Matthew 28:19), and Luke’s own Gospel ends with the promise that “repentance and forgiveness of sins should be proclaimed in his name to all nations, beginning from Jerusalem” (Luke 24:47). Acts 8, moving from Jerusalem to Samaria to the Ethiopian, narrates the early stages of that very expansion, driven by the risen Christ through His Spirit.

Second, the chapter continues the Gospels’ theme of Samaria and the breaking of ethnic barriers. Jesus had ministered to a Samaritan woman at Sychar, declaring Himself the Messiah and reaping a harvest there (John 4:1–42); He had made a Samaritan the hero of a parable (Luke 10:33) and commended a Samaritan leper’s gratitude (Luke 17:16). Philip’s mission in Acts 8 reaps what Christ had sown, and the apostles who once wanted fire on Samaria (Luke 9:54) now bless her.

Third, Acts 8 makes explicit the Gospels’ witness to Christ as the Suffering Servant of Isaiah 53. Jesus applied Isaiah’s Servant to Himself (“he was numbered with the transgressors,” Luke 22:37), and the Gospels present His silence before His accusers (Matthew 27:12–14; Mark 14:61) as the fulfillment of “like a lamb before its shearer is silent” (Isaiah 53:7). Philip preaches this Servant as Jesus.

Fourth, the chapter develops the Gospels’ concern with the nature of true faith. As John’s Gospel distinguished sign-faith from saving faith (John 2:23–25), so Simon’s spurious belief (Acts 8:13, 21) illustrates Jesus’ parable of the rocky soil (Luke 8:13). Fifth, it embodies the Gospels’ concern for the outcast and marginalized — Christ came for tax collectors, lepers, and sinners, and now the gospel receives a eunuch long barred from the assembly.

Old Testament Connections

Pentateuch: Deuteronomy 23:1 excluded the eunuch from the assembly of the LORD; the eunuch’s baptism (Acts 8:36–38) shows the gospel surpassing that exclusion. The Abrahamic promise that “in you all the families of the earth shall be blessed” (Genesis 12:3; 22:18) begins its fulfillment as Samaritan and Ethiopian are gathered in. Babel’s scattering of the nations (Genesis 11:1–9) is being reversed in the one Christ.

Historical Books: The origin of the Samaritans lies in 2 Kings 17:24–41, where the northern land was resettled with mixed peoples after Assyria’s conquest — the root of the Jew–Samaritan estrangement now healed by the gospel. Solomon’s temple prayer acknowledged that God alone knows “the hearts of all the children of mankind” (1 Kings 8:39), the discernment Peter exercises over Simon.

Wisdom Literature: Psalm 51:16–17 (“a broken and contrite heart, O God, you will not despise”) illumines the false repentance of Simon, who feared judgment but was not broken. Psalm 68:31 foretells that “Cush shall hasten to stretch out her hands to God” — proleptically fulfilled in the Ethiopian’s conversion. Proverbs 28:13 contrasts concealing and confessing sin.

Major Prophets: Isaiah 53:7–8 is directly quoted (Acts 8:32–33) and identified as Christ, the silent Lamb led to slaughter, bearing humiliation and denied justice for sinners (Isaiah 53:5–6, 11). Isaiah 56:3–5 promises the eunuch “a name better than sons and daughters” and 56:7 “a house of prayer for all peoples” — fulfilled in the eunuch’s welcome. Isaiah 49:6 sets the Servant “as a light for the nations… to the end of the earth.” Ezekiel 36:26 promises the new heart Simon lacked. Jeremiah 17:9–10 describes the heart’s deceit and God’s searching of it.

Minor Prophets: Amos 9:11–12 foretells the ingathering of the nations who are “called by my name,” cited by James in Acts 15:16–17 as the theological basis for the very Gentile mission Acts 8 begins. Joel 2:28–32, fulfilled at Pentecost, undergirds the Spirit’s outpouring extended here to Samaria.

New Testament Fulfillment

Gospels/Acts: Acts 8 fulfills Acts 1:8 (“Judea and Samaria”) and prepares for the Gentile mission proper — Cornelius (Acts 10), the Jerusalem Council (Acts 15), and Paul’s journeys “to the end of the earth.” The conversion of Saul, foreshadowed by his role here (Acts 8:1, 3), follows immediately in Acts 9. Philip reappears as “Philip the evangelist” with four prophesying daughters (Acts 21:8–9).

Paul’s Epistles: Paul, the persecutor of Acts 8:3, becomes the great expositor of grace: salvation “by grace… through faith… not… of works” (Ephesians 2:8–9), directly answering Simon’s simony. Paul develops the breaking of the dividing wall between peoples (Ephesians 2:11–22; Galatians 3:28) and grounds the atonement in the Servant “who was delivered up for our trespasses” (Romans 4:25; cf. Isaiah 53). Romans 8:9 establishes that all who belong to Christ have His Spirit.

General Epistles/Revelation: First Peter identifies Christ as the sinless Lamb who “committed no sin, neither was deceit found in his mouth” and “bore our sins in his body on the tree” (1 Peter 2:22–24; cf. Isaiah 53), and grounds redemption in His “precious blood… like that of a lamb” (1 Peter 1:18–19), refuting the purchase of grace. James distinguishes dead faith from living (James 2:19), illustrated by Simon. Revelation shows the final fruit: a people redeemed “from every tribe and language and people and nation” (Revelation 5:9), the end toward which Acts 8 points.

Redemptive-Historical Context

Acts 8 marks a decisive movement in the unfolding drama of redemption: the gospel breaks out of Jerusalem toward the nations, fulfilling the risen Christ’s mandate (Acts 1:8) and the ancient promise to Abraham. Within the arc of Creation, Fall, Redemption, and Consummation, this chapter belongs to the age of Redemption applied — the era between Pentecost and the return of Christ, when the Spirit gathers the elect from all peoples through the preached word.

The chapter recovers ground lost in the Fall. Humanity, one at creation, was fractured at Babel (Genesis 11), scattered into hostile nations and tongues. Israel’s own division (the Samaritan estrangement of 2 Kings 17) mirrored that fracture. In Acts 8 the one gospel begins to reverse Babel: Samaritans divided from Jews, and an African official from the far south, are gathered to the one Christ, foreshadowing the multitude “from every nation” (Revelation 7:9). What sin had scattered, grace regathers in the Second Adam.

At the theological center stands the Suffering Servant of Isaiah 53, quoted at Acts 8:32–33. The whole movement of redemptive history converges on the Lamb “led to the slaughter.” His silent humiliation and the denial of justice to Him are the price of the nations’ redemption; the innocent Servant bears the guilt of many (Isaiah 53:5–6, 11), accomplishing the atonement that makes the ingathering possible. Philip’s preaching of this text is the hinge: the cross is the ground on which Samaritan and eunuch alike are welcomed.

The chapter also displays the already/not yet tension. Already the Spirit is poured out, barriers fall, and outcasts rejoice; the kingdom breaks in with power over demons and disease (Acts 8:7). Yet not yet is the ingathering complete; Simon’s presence among the baptized shows that the visible church still contains wheat and tares (Matthew 13:24–30) until the final separation. The eunuch’s welcome fulfills Isaiah 56, yet awaits its consummation when the redeemed of all nations are gathered before the throne.

Finally, the chapter is thoroughly new-covenant and Christ-centered. The old order — the exclusion of the eunuch, the temple-centered worship at Jerusalem, the letter that divided Jew and Samaritan — gives way to the new reality in which access to God comes through the crucified and risen Christ, and the Spirit is given to all who believe (Acts 2:38–39). The scattering that opens the chapter is, in God’s providence, the sowing of gospel seed; the “much joy” of Samaria (Acts 8:8) and the rejoicing eunuch (Acts 8:39) are the firstfruits of the harvest that will fill the new creation.

---

Systematic Theology Connection

The Sovereignty of God and Providence over Persecution

Acts 8 opens with a “great persecution” (Acts 8:1) that scatters the church, and closes with the gospel spreading to Samaria and Ethiopia. The connection is not accidental but providential: “those who were scattered went about preaching the word” (Acts 8:4). Scripture teaches that God “works all things according to the counsel of his will” (Ephesians 1:11), governing even the sinful acts of men to accomplish His holy ends without being the author of sin. This is the doctrine of concurrence: God ordains both the ends and the means, working through second causes. As Joseph declared, “you meant evil against me, but God meant it for good” (Genesis 50:20), and as the church prayed regarding the crucifixion, Herod and Pilate did “whatever your hand and your plan had predestined to take place” (Acts 4:27–28). The Westminster Confession affirms that God’s providence extends “to the first fall, and all other sins of angels and men,” which He orders “to his own most holy ends,” yet so that “the sinfulness thereof proceedeth only from the creature, and not from God” (WCF 5.4). The persecution meant for the church’s destruction became the engine of her expansion. Practically, this doctrine steadies the believer under suffering and opposition: no hostile power operates outside the sovereign hand of God, and He is able to turn even the fury of persecutors into the furtherance of the gospel (Philippians 1:12). We may therefore face upheaval without despair, trusting that “for those who love God all things work together for good” (Romans 8:28). Cross references: Genesis 50:20; Proverbs 16:9; Isaiah 46:9–10; Acts 4:27–28; Romans 8:28.

The Necessity of the Spirit’s Regenerating Work

Simon’s case (Acts 8:9–24) is a stark demonstration that outward reform, profession, and even baptism cannot substitute for the inward work of the Spirit. Simon “believed” and “was baptized” (Acts 8:13), yet Peter found his “heart… not right before God” and “in the bond of iniquity” (Acts 8:21, 23). This illustrates the doctrine that fallen man is by nature “dead in… trespasses” (Ephesians 2:1) and must be born anew: “unless one is born again he cannot see the kingdom of God” (John 3:3). Regeneration is a sovereign, monergistic act of the Spirit who gives a new heart: “I will give you a new heart, and a new spirit I will put within you” (Ezekiel 36:26); we are “born, not of blood nor of the will of the flesh nor of the will of man, but of God” (John 1:13). The Westminster Confession teaches that in effectual calling God “enlightens their minds… renewing their wills, and, by his almighty power, determining them to that which is good” (WCF 10.1), and that this is “of God’s free and special grace alone” (WCF 10.2). Simon lacked this inner renewal; his religion was external only. Practically, this doctrine drives us past superficial Christianity — mere assent, ritual, or emotional excitement — to seek the new birth that only God can give, and to rest our hope not on a past profession but on the enduring evidence of the Spirit’s transforming work. Cross references: John 3:1–8; John 1:12–13; Ezekiel 36:26–27; Titus 3:5; 1 Peter 1:23.

Faith and Its Counterfeits

The chapter sets true faith beside its counterfeit. The Samaritans “believed Philip as he preached good news” and were saved (Acts 8:12), while Simon “believed” in a way that left him lost (Acts 8:13, 21). Scripture recognizes several kinds of “faith”: the temporary faith of the rocky soil (Luke 8:13), the dead faith that even demons possess (James 2:19), and true, living, saving faith. Saving faith is a Spirit-wrought, whole-souled reliance on Christ that “works through love” (Galatians 5:6), perseveres to the end (Matthew 24:13), and bears fruit (John 15:5). The Westminster Confession describes saving faith as receiving and resting “upon Christ alone for justification, sanctification, and eternal life” (WCF 14.2), and notes it may be “different in degrees, weak or strong” yet “growing up in many to the attainment of a full assurance” (WCF 14.3). The counterfeit, by contrast, is drawn by benefits or spectacle and lacks living union with Christ; it fails the test of time and trial. Practically, this calls believers to “examine yourselves, to see whether you are in the faith” (2 Corinthians 13:5), locating assurance not in the intensity of a past experience but in a persevering trust in and love for Christ, evidenced by the fruit of the Spirit. It also warns the church against pronouncing every profession genuine, while comforting the weakest true believer that saving faith may be small yet real. Cross references: Luke 8:13; James 2:14–26; Matthew 13:20–21; Galatians 5:6; 2 Corinthians 13:5.

The Word and Sacrament: Baptism

Acts 8 links the preaching of the word with the administration of baptism: the Samaritans “believed… they were baptized” (Acts 8:12), Simon “believed… he was baptized” (Acts 8:13), and the eunuch, having heard the gospel, was baptized upon his confession (Acts 8:36–38). Baptism is the covenant sign of initiation, signifying union with Christ, the washing away of sin, and incorporation into the church (Romans 6:3–4; Acts 2:38). Yet the chapter also clarifies the sacrament’s nature: it does not automatically confer grace apart from faith, as Simon’s case proves. The Westminster Confession teaches that “the efficacy of Baptism is not tied to that moment of time wherein it is administered,” and that grace is conferred “by the Holy Ghost, to such… as that grace belongeth unto, according to the counsel of God’s own will” (WCF 28.6); the sacraments are effectual means of salvation “not from any virtue in them,” but by “the working of the Holy Ghost” and the blessing of Christ (WCF 27.3; Shorter Catechism Q.91). Baptism is rightly administered on a credible profession of faith, since the church cannot infallibly judge the heart. Practically, this exalts baptism as a precious sign and seal of the covenant while guarding against superstition: the sign without the Spirit’s inward work profits nothing (Romans 2:28–29; 1 Peter 3:21). Cross references: Acts 2:38–39; Romans 6:3–4; 1 Peter 3:21; Colossians 2:11–12; Romans 2:28–29.

Effectual Calling and Divine Initiative in Evangelism

The conversion of the eunuch (Acts 8:26–39) is saturated with divine initiative. An angel directs Philip (Acts 8:26); the Spirit commands him, “Go over and join this chariot” (Acts 8:29); God has already prepared the eunuch, reading Isaiah on the very passage that testifies of Christ. Salvation is God’s work from first to last: He appoints the messenger, prepares the hearer, opens the Scripture, and grants faith. This displays effectual calling — the sovereign act by which God draws His elect to Christ through the outward call of the word and the inward work of the Spirit: “no one can come to me unless the Father who sent me draws him” (John 6:44); “as many as were appointed to eternal life believed” (Acts 13:48). The Westminster Confession affirms that the effectual call is “of God’s free and special grace alone, not from anything at all foreseen in man,” and that man is “altogether passive therein, until, being quickened and renewed by the Holy Spirit, he is thereby enabled to answer this call” (WCF 10.2). Evangelism, then, is not manipulation but obedient participation in God’s saving purpose: we go where He sends, speak the word He gives, and trust Him to grant the increase (1 Corinthians 3:6–7). Practically, this frees the evangelist from both pride and despair — the results belong to God, and we labor in hope, knowing He has His people even in “desert places.” Cross references: John 6:44; John 15:16; Acts 13:48; 1 Corinthians 3:6–7; 2 Timothy 2:10.

The Christ-Centered Interpretation of Scripture

When the eunuch reads Isaiah 53 and asks of whom the prophet speaks, Philip, “beginning with this Scripture… told him the good news about Jesus” (Acts 8:35). This models the doctrine that all Scripture testifies of Christ. Jesus taught this of Himself: “beginning with Moses and all the Prophets, he interpreted… the things concerning himself” (Luke 24:27); “you search the Scriptures… it is they that bear witness about me” (John 5:39). The Reformed tradition therefore reads the Bible redemptive-historically and Christocentrically, seeing Christ as the substance of both Testaments. The Westminster Confession affirms that “the full sense of any Scripture… is not manifold, but one,” and that Scripture interprets Scripture (WCF 1.9), with the New Testament unveiling what the Old foreshadowed. Isaiah 53, written centuries before, describes the penal-substitutionary death of the Servant with such precision that Philip needs only to preach Jesus as its fulfillment. This doctrine shapes both interpretation and evangelism: we read every text asking how it points to Christ and His redemptive work, and we proclaim Christ from the whole of Scripture. Practically, it guards against moralistic or merely ethical readings that miss the Savior, and it equips believers to trace the gospel through all sixty-six books. The One who is the Word made flesh (John 1:14) is also the key that unlocks the written Word. Cross references: Luke 24:27, 44; John 5:39, 46; 1 Peter 1:10–11; 2 Timothy 3:15; Romans 1:2–4.

Simony and the Free Grace of God

Simon’s attempt to buy the gift of the Spirit (Acts 8:18–20) gave the church the word simony and a lasting lesson in the freeness of grace. Peter’s verdict — “May your silver perish with you, because you thought you could obtain the gift of God with money!” (Acts 8:20) — establishes that God’s grace is not for sale and cannot be merited. The doctrine of sola gratia teaches that salvation is “the gift of God, not a result of works, so that no one may boast” (Ephesians 2:8–9); “if it is by grace, it is no longer on the basis of works; otherwise grace would no longer be grace” (Romans 11:6). What Simon sought to purchase was already bought — at the incomparable price of “the precious blood of Christ” (1 Peter 1:18–19) — and is therefore given to us freely, “without money and without price” (Isaiah 55:1). The Westminster Confession locates justification in God’s free grace, “not for anything wrought in them, or done by them,” but imputing the righteousness of Christ received “by faith alone” (WCF 11.1). Simony, in its broad sense, is any attempt to secure divine favor or spiritual office by payment, merit, or manipulation — a denial of grace at its root. Practically, this doctrine liberates the sinner from every mercenary bargain with God and directs the church to guard the freeness of the gospel against all forms of spiritual commerce. Cross references: Isaiah 55:1; Romans 6:23; Romans 11:6; Ephesians 2:8–9; 1 Peter 1:18–19.

---

Reformed Theology

Acts 8 is a rich seam for Reformed reflection, exhibiting the covenant of grace advancing to the nations and the sovereignty of God governing every strand of the narrative. The chapter opens in the framework of God’s eternal decree and providence: the persecution that scatters the church (Acts 8:1) is no accident but the appointed means of fulfilling Christ’s word in Acts 1:8. Reformed theologians have long seen here the doctrine of concurrence — that God works His holy purposes through the free (and here sinful) actions of men, as Herod, Pilate, and the nations accomplished “whatever your hand and your plan had predestined” (Acts 4:28). Geerhardus Vos’s biblical-theological method illumines the chapter as a stage in the organic unfolding of redemption, moving from Jerusalem outward as the eschatological Spirit gathers the nations; the coming of the gospel to Samaria and Ethiopia is a firstfruits of the age of fulfillment inaugurated at Pentecost.

The covenant of grace frames the ingathering of Samaritan and eunuch. The Abrahamic promise that “in you all the families of the earth shall be blessed” (Genesis 12:3) finds early fulfillment as barriers of ethnicity and ceremonial exclusion fall. The eunuch, barred by Deuteronomy 23:1, is welcomed in fulfillment of Isaiah 56:3–5 — a movement from the shadows of the old administration to the substance of the new, all within the one covenant of grace administered differently across the ages (WCF 7.5–6). Calvin, commenting on the passage, marvels at the sovereign grace that “stretched out His hand from heaven” to save the outcast and that converted even the persecutor Saul, whom he calls a “wolf” made a “shepherd.”

The chapter also supplies classic material for the doctrine of the church and the sacraments. The delayed giving of the Spirit to Samaria (Acts 8:14–17) is read by Reformed interpreters not as a normative “second blessing” but as a unique, unifying act binding the Samaritan believers into the one apostolic church — safeguarding the unity of the body against schism. Sinclair Ferguson and others stress that the ordinary New Testament pattern is the gift of the Spirit to all who believe (Romans 8:9; Ephesians 1:13), warning against a two-tier Christianity. Simon’s spurious faith (Acts 8:13, 21) furnishes the Reformed distinction between temporary and saving faith, and the doctrine that the visible church contains “wheat and tares” until the end (WCF 25.5; Matthew 13:24–30). His attempted purchase of the Spirit magnifies sola gratia: grace bought is grace denied.

At the heart of the chapter, the quotation of Isaiah 53 anchors the Reformed emphasis on penal substitutionary atonement and the Christocentric reading of Scripture. Philip preaches the Lamb led to slaughter (Acts 8:32–35), the Servant who bore the sin of many (Isaiah 53:6, 11) — the doctrine dear to Calvin, Spurgeon, Sproul, and Ferguson. B. B. Warfield’s insistence on Scripture’s unity and Christ-centered testimony, and the Reformed hermeneutic that “the New is in the Old concealed, the Old is in the New revealed,” are perfectly displayed as Philip begins with Isaiah and arrives at Jesus. Spurgeon, preaching on the eunuch, delighted that “the Ethiopian went on his way rejoicing” because he had found the Lamb of God. Thus Acts 8, read through Reformed eyes, proclaims a sovereign God who ordains persecution for gospel advance, gathers the nations into the covenant of grace through the crucified Servant, and by His Spirit grants the new birth that alone makes faith saving — to the praise of His free and glorious grace.

---

Dispensational Theology

A Dispensational reading of Acts 8 approaches the chapter with its characteristic commitments: a consistently literal-grammatical hermeneutic, a clear distinction between Israel and the church, and an expectation of a future national restoration of ethnic Israel. Dispensationalists such as C. I. Scofield, Charles Ryrie, John Walvoord, and J. Dwight Pentecost situate Acts 8 within the transitional period following the founding of the church at Pentecost, tracing the programmatic outline of Acts 1:8 as the gospel moves from Jerusalem into Judea and Samaria.

On the Israel/church distinction, Dispensationalists note that Acts records a period of transition in which God’s dealings shift from the nation of Israel, which had rejected her Messiah (culminating in Stephen’s martyrdom, Acts 7), toward the church composed of Jew and Gentile. The offer to Samaria and the Ethiopian marks the gospel’s outward movement, yet classic Dispensationalism maintains that the church remains distinct from Israel and that God’s covenant promises to national Israel — land, throne, and kingdom — await literal fulfillment in a future millennial age. The “kingdom of God” Philip preached (Acts 8:12) is understood by many Dispensationalists in its present, spiritual dimension, distinguished from the future, earthly Davidic kingdom to be established at Christ’s return (Acts 1:6–7; Revelation 20).

Regarding the Samaritan reception of the Spirit (Acts 8:14–17), Dispensational writers such as Ryrie and Walvoord treat the delay as a transitional phenomenon unique to the book of Acts, marking distinct groups being incorporated into the church (Samaritans here, Gentiles in Acts 10, John’s disciples in Acts 19). They generally agree with the Reformed observation that this is not a pattern for the normal Christian life today, though they frame it within their scheme of Acts as a transitional book bridging dispensations. The laying on of the apostles’ hands is seen as belonging to the foundational apostolic era.

On the eunuch’s conversion (Acts 8:26–39), Dispensationalists read Isaiah 53 with their literal hermeneutic as a genuine predictive prophecy of the Messiah’s substitutionary death, fulfilled in Jesus — a point of strong agreement with Reformed exegesis. They note the individual, personal nature of this salvation and the fulfillment of Isaiah 56 regarding the foreigner and eunuch. Some Dispensationalists observe that the eunuch, an African God-fearer, represents the gospel’s reach to the Gentile world, anticipating the fuller Gentile mission that Paul will lead. Pentecost and Walvoord emphasize the historical reliability of Luke’s account and the precision of prophetic fulfillment.

On Simon (Acts 8:9–24), Dispensationalists concur that his faith was spurious, illustrating the difference between profession and possession, and warning against a merely intellectual or mercenary religion. In sum, Dispensational theology affirms with the Reformed the sovereign spread of the gospel, the substitutionary death of Christ in Isaiah 53, and the danger of false faith, while distinctively reading Acts 8 as part of a transitional era, maintaining the Israel/church distinction, and reserving Israel’s national kingdom promises for a literal future fulfillment.

---

Bibliography

• Beale, G. K. A New Testament Biblical Theology: The Unfolding of the Old Testament in the New. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2011.
• Bruce, F. F. The Book of the Acts. New International Commentary on the New Testament. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1988.
• Calvin, John. Commentary upon the Acts of the Apostles. Translated by Christopher Fetherstone. Grand Rapids: Baker.
• Calvin, John. Institutes of the Christian Religion. Translated by Ford Lewis Battles. Philadelphia: Westminster Press, 1960.
• Carson, D. A., and Douglas J. Moo. An Introduction to the New Testament. Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 2005.
• Ferguson, Sinclair B. The Holy Spirit. Contours of Christian Theology. Downers Grove: InterVarsity Press, 1996.
• Henry, Matthew. Commentary on the Whole Bible. Vol. 6, Acts to Revelation. Peabody: Hendrickson.
• Pentecost, J. Dwight. Things to Come: A Study in Biblical Eschatology. Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1958.
• Piper, John. Filling Up the Afflictions of Christ. Wheaton: Crossway, 2009.
• Poole, Matthew. A Commentary on the Holy Bible. Vol. 3. Peabody: Hendrickson.
• Ryrie, Charles C. Dispensationalism. Chicago: Moody Press, 1995.
• Scofield, C. I. The Scofield Reference Bible. New York: Oxford University Press, 1917.
• Sproul, R. C. Acts. St. Andrew’s Expositional Commentary. Wheaton: Crossway, 2010.
• Spurgeon, Charles H. The Metropolitan Tabernacle Pulpit. London: Passmore & Alabaster.
• Stott, John R. W. The Message of Acts. The Bible Speaks Today. Downers Grove: InterVarsity Press, 1990.
• Vos, Geerhardus. Biblical Theology: Old and New Testaments. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1948.
• Walvoord, John F. The Holy Spirit. Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1958.
• Warfield, B. B. The Inspiration and Authority of the Bible. Philadelphia: Presbyterian and Reformed, 1948.
• The Westminster Confession of Faith and the Larger and Shorter Catechisms. Edinburgh: Banner of Truth Trust.