The Berean Table

Field	Detail
Pericope	Isaiah 35:1–10
Theme	The LORD turns the wilderness into a garden and builds a holy road on which his ransomed people come home to Zion.

---

Opening Prayer

---

Closing Prayer

---

Timeline Context

Isaiah 35 stands at a deliberate hinge in the book. Chapters 28–33 are the six woes against Judah’s leaders and their Egyptian alliance, spoken in Hezekiah’s reign during the anti-Assyrian agitation that followed the death of Sargon II in 705 BC. That crisis breaks in Sennacherib’s campaign of 701 BC, narrated in chapters 36–37. Between the woes and the narrative, Isaiah sets a two-panel canvas: chapters 34 and 35, judgment and salvation, painted in the same colors so that the reader cannot miss the contrast.

Chapter 34 summons the nations to judgment and settles on Edom as the representative case. Edom is measured for un-creation with the surveyor’s tools of chaos — “the line of confusion over it, and the plumb line of emptiness” (34:11) — its streams turned to pitch, its land left to thorns, nettles, and the haunts of wild creatures. Chapter 35 takes that same landscape and reverses it. The wilderness blossoms, the burning sand becomes a pool, and the place where jackals lay down grows reeds and rushes (35:7). The one chapter cannot be read without the other; they are a single argument in two movements.

Historically, the chapter looks past Assyria altogether. Its language of return, ransom, and a road home reaches toward the Babylonian exile that chapter 39 will announce and that chapter 40 will address as already underway. Isaiah, prophesying in Jerusalem across the reigns of Uzziah, Jotham, Ahaz, and Hezekiah (1:1), is given to see beyond the immediate Assyrian threat to a deliverance far larger than any single deliverance from any single empire. Verse 10 is repeated almost word for word at 51:11, deep in the Book of Comfort, which shows that Isaiah himself understood this text as the anthem of the return.

Redemptive-historically, Isaiah 35 sits on the highway that runs through the whole book: a way in the wilderness at 11:16, a road between Egypt and Assyria at 19:23, the Way of Holiness here at 35:8, the voice crying “prepare the way of the LORD” at 40:3, a way in the wilderness again at 43:19, the mountains made a road at 49:11, and the command to build up the highway at 62:10. That motif runs straight into the Gospels, where John the Baptist is identified as the voice of 40:3 and where Jesus says, “I am the way” (John 14:6). Isaiah 35 is the chapter where the road is named and its travelers described.

---

Historical-Grammatical Study

Genre. Isaiah 35 is a prophetic salvation oracle in Hebrew poetry — an eschatological hymn of restoration, structurally the counterpart to the oracle of judgment in chapter 34. It shows the standard features of Hebrew verse: parallelism throughout (35:1, 3, 5, 10), triple and quadruple stacking of synonyms, and inclusio. The chapter opens with joy in the wilderness and closes with joy in Zion; the words for gladness and rejoicing that begin verse 1 return, intensified, in verse 10, so that the whole chapter is bracketed by the same note.

Vocabulary of barrenness and its reversal. Verse 1 piles up three terms for uninhabitable land: midbar (wilderness, uncultivated pasture), tsiyyah (parched or dry land), and aravah (the desert rift, the Arabah). Against them the poet sets verbs of joy and a single startling image, the chavatstseleth — the “crocus” in the ESV, a bulb flower that appears suddenly after rain. Verse 7 answers with sharav, the shimmering “burning sand” or mirage of the desert, which becomes an actual pool, and with tannim, jackals, whose lair becomes a marsh of reeds. The reversal is deliberately physical: not merely that the desert improves, but that the very markers of desolation become the markers of abundance.

Imperatives with a plural audience. Verses 3–4 are addressed to a plural “you” who are told to strengthen someone else’s hands and to say something to the anxious-hearted. The Hebrew idiom of verse 4, nimharei-lev, is literally “hasty of heart” — those whose hearts race, who are rattled and rushed by fear. The grammar makes this a commissioning: the comfort of the chapter is entrusted to a community that must speak it aloud to one another.

Vengeance and salvation in one clause. Verse 4 puts naqam (vengeance) and gemul (recompense) in the same breath as “He will come and save you.” Hebrew prophecy does not divide these into two separate advents of God; for the oppressed they are one event, because the removal of the oppressor is the salvation of the oppressed.

The two words for deliverance. Verse 9 uses ge’ulim, the passive participle of ga’al, the verb of the kinsman-redeemer who buys back a family member’s person or property (Leviticus 25:47–49; Ruth 4:4–6). Verse 10 uses peduyim, from padah, the verb of ransom by payment of a price, the language of the firstborn’s redemption (Exodus 13:13). Placing the two terms in adjacent verses is not repetition but enrichment: the travelers on this road belong to God both by kinship claim and by purchase price.

Ancient Near Eastern background. Great kings built processional roads — raised, cleared causeways for the images of the gods and for royal returns from campaign. Maslul in verse 8 is precisely such a built-up highway, distinguished from the ordinary derek, the beaten track. Isaiah takes the imperial image and inverts it: this causeway is not built for an idol’s procession but for ransomed captives coming home, and its holiness, not its engineering, is what defines it.

Covenantal themes. The chapter is saturated with covenant reversal. The blessings of Deuteronomy 28 — fertile land, safety from wild beasts, joy before the LORD — are here restored to a people who had forfeited them under the curses. The removal of the lion and the ravenous beast (35:9) echoes the covenant promise of Leviticus 26:6, and the return to Zion with singing is the pilgrimage of Deuteronomy 16 made permanent. Because Isaiah 40–55 reuses this chapter’s closing verse verbatim at 51:11, and because the highway motif binds chapters 11, 19, 35, 40, 43, 49, and 62 together, chapter 35 is also one of the strongest internal witnesses to the unity of the book. This project holds, with E. J. Young, Motyer, and Oswalt, that Isaiah of Jerusalem wrote the whole prophecy; a reader who later meets the critical division of the book at chapter 40 should notice that its shared vocabulary and its shared highway begin here, on the near side of the supposed seam.

---

Expanded Outline

Section 1 — The Wilderness Blossoms (Isaiah 35:1–2)

Key Insight

The chapter opens by handing a wasteland a set of verbs it has no right to: “The wilderness and the dry land shall be glad; the desert shall rejoice and blossom like the crocus” (v. 1). Three Hebrew nouns of desolation — midbar, tsiyyah, aravah — are made the subjects of gladness. Nothing in the desert produces this. The land does not improve itself; it is acted upon. Verse 2 makes the source explicit: “The glory of Lebanon shall be given to it” — given, a passive of pure gift.

The force of this is felt only against chapter 34, where the same divine hand measured Edom for un-creation with “the line of confusion over it, and the plumb line of emptiness” (34:11), the vocabulary of the formless void of Genesis 1:2. Calvin sees the connection exactly. He writes, “Here the Prophet describes a wonderful change; for having in the former chapter described the destruction of Idumaea, and having said that it would be changed into a wilderness, he now promises, on the other hand, fertility to the wilderness, so that barren and waste lands shall become highly productive.” (Calvin, Commentary on Isaiah, on 35:1). Calvin’s point is that the two chapters are one act of God, not two moods: the same sovereign word that unmakes a proud nation remakes a barren one, and neither outcome is drawn from the material itself.

The three place names in verse 2 are chosen with care. “The glory of Lebanon shall be given to it, the majesty of Carmel and Sharon” — and at 33:9 those very places had failed: “Lebanon is confounded and withers away; Sharon is like a desert, and Bashan and Carmel shake off their leaves.” Isaiah reverses his own earlier line. The fertile north and the coastal plain, emblems of Israel’s best land, had been reduced to desert; now the desert receives their splendor.

The climax is not horticultural but visual: “They shall see the glory of the LORD, the majesty of our God.” The flowering is a means; the seeing is the end. Matthew Henry reads this inwardly and rightly: “Converting grace makes the soul that was a wilderness, to rejoice with joy and singing, and to blossom abundantly.” (Henry, Concise Commentary on the Whole Bible, on 35:1–4). Henry is not allegorizing away the landscape but recognizing that a God who reverses deserts is the same God who reverses hearts, and that the second is the greater work.

Christologically, the sentence “They shall see the glory of the LORD” is answered in John 1:14, where the glory is beheld in flesh, and in John 2:11, where the first sign turns water into wine at a wedding — a desert made fertile in miniature. The blossoming of the wilderness is not a metaphor Christ borrowed; it is a promise he fulfilled.

Application

Begin where the text begins: with the honest admission that some part of your life is desert. Isaiah does not open by telling the wilderness to try harder. He announces what will be done to it. Christians who have been taught to measure their spiritual health by effort find this disorienting, and it is meant to. If your prayer life is arid, your affections flat, your congregation small and tired, the first word of this chapter is not a rebuke but a promise that God’s characteristic work is done on ground that produces nothing.

Practically, this reshapes how you pray. Pray for gift language rather than achievement language: ask that glory be given, as verse 2 says, rather than resolving to manufacture it. It also reshapes how you assess a season. Judah’s best land had withered (33:9); the reversal came from outside the system, not from a better agricultural policy. A church in decline, a marriage grown quiet, a believer in a long spiritual drought — none of these is beyond the reach of a God whose specialty is barren ground (Ezekiel 37:1–14; Romans 4:17).

And keep the goal in view. The desert blooms so that people “shall see the glory of the LORD.” Renewal that terminates on our comfort has stopped short of the text. When God refreshes you, the appropriate response is to look up, not merely to enjoy the improvement.

A warning against misapplication: this promise is not a guarantee that any particular barren circumstance in your life will flower on your timetable, and it must never be used to shame someone still in the dry season. Isaiah is describing what God will certainly do for his whole people, consummated at Christ’s return; between the promise and its fullness lie real years of drought. Preach the certainty of the harvest without pretending the desert is already gone.

---

Section 2 — Strengthen the Weak Hands (Isaiah 35:3–4)

Key Insight

The poem breaks off from describing the future and turns to command the present: “Strengthen the weak hands, and make firm the feeble knees. Say to those who have an anxious heart, ‘Be strong; fear not! Behold, your God will come with vengeance, with the recompense of God. He will come and save you’” (vv. 3–4). The imperatives are plural. Isaiah is not telling the discouraged to pull themselves together; he is commissioning a community to do something for its weakest members. Hands that hang down and knees that buckle are the physical vocabulary of exhaustion, and the remedy prescribed is speech — say to them.

The content of the speech is striking. It is not “you are stronger than you think.” It is “Behold, your God.” Courage in Isaiah is derivative; it comes from a report about God, not from an assessment of the self. Calvin locates the source precisely: “That strength of which he spoke is breathed into our hearts by God through his word” (Calvin, Commentary on Isaiah, on 35:4). Calvin’s point is that the ministry commanded here is a ministry of the word, because the strength being transferred is not the speaker’s own; the speaker is a conduit for a promise, and the promise does the work.

Matthew Henry presses the same nerve pastorally: “Fear is weakening; the more we strive against it, the stronger we are, both for doing and suffering; and he that says to us, Be strong, has laid help for us upon One who is mighty.” (Henry, Concise Commentary on the Whole Bible, on 35:1–4). Henry catches the double movement — the command to be strong is not an unfunded demand, because the God who issues it has already placed our help on someone competent to bear it (Psalm 89:19).

Verse 4 also refuses a distinction we like to make. “Your God will come with vengeance, with the recompense of God. He will come and save you.” Naqam and gemul — vengeance and recompense — arrive in the same sentence as salvation, because for people under the boot of an oppressor these are one event. The removal of Assyria is the deliverance of Judah. At the cross this convergence reaches its depth: judgment falls and rescue is accomplished in a single act (Romans 3:25–26).

The New Testament aims this text at the church. Hebrews 12:12 takes it up almost word for word for a congregation worn down by opposition: “Therefore lift your drooping hands and strengthen your weak knees.” The writer is not decorating his argument with an Old Testament phrase; he is claiming that Isaiah’s commission belongs to Christians. The comfort of Isaiah 35 is placed in the hands of ordinary believers and meant to be spoken.

Application

This is the most immediately usable text in the chapter, and its application is unavoidably social. Someone in your congregation has weak hands this week. The command is not to notice it, or to pray about it privately, but to go and say something — and the something is not advice about their circumstances but news about their God. Prepare the sentence before you need it. “Behold, your God” is a better opening than “at least it could be worse.”

Notice also that Isaiah addresses the discouraged as people to be strengthened, not scolded. There is no hint that feeble knees are a moral failure. Hebrews 12:12 makes the same assumption about a church under pressure. So resist the instinct to diagnose why a struggling believer is struggling before you comfort them; the text puts the comfort first and does not get around to the diagnosis at all.

For the discouraged themselves, the application is to let yourself be spoken to. Anxious hearts, nimharei-lev, are hearts that race ahead; they are hard to interrupt. Put yourself deliberately where the promise will be read to you — public worship, family devotions, a friend who will say it out loud — because this is a promise designed to arrive through another voice (Colossians 3:16).

A warning against misapplication: “Be strong; fear not” is a word to be given, not a weapon to be used. Said to a grieving or depressed believer as a rebuke, it becomes an accusation that their fear is a sin to be repented of on the spot, which is exactly the opposite of Isaiah’s intent. The verse also does not promise that fear will vanish at once; it promises that God will come. Speak it as news, patiently and repeatedly, the way you would speak to someone whose hands genuinely will not close.

---

Section 3 — The Signs of the Coming Age (Isaiah 35:5–6)

Key Insight

“Then the eyes of the blind shall be opened, and the ears of the deaf unstopped; then shall the lame man leap like a deer, and the tongue of the mute sing for joy” (vv. 5–6). The little word “then” ties these verses to the coming of verse 4. These are not miracles scattered at random; they are the credentials of an arriving King, the visible evidence that the God who promised to come has come.

Four disabilities are named, and they are arranged as two pairs of receiving and expressing: eyes and ears take in, feet and tongue give out. Each is reversed with a verb of excess rather than mere repair. The lame man does not walk; he leaps “like a deer.” The mute does not speak; he sings. Isaiah’s picture of restoration is not a return to baseline but an overflow.

This is the passage Jesus reaches for at the decisive moment of his own self-identification. When John the Baptist sends from prison to ask whether he is the one to come, Jesus does not answer with a title. He answers with a list: “the blind receive their sight and the lame walk, lepers are cleansed and the deaf hear, and the dead are raised up, and the poor have good news preached to them” (Matthew 11:5; compare Luke 7:22). That list is stitched together from Isaiah 35:5–6, 29:18, and 61:1. Jesus is not making a general claim that he does miracles; he is citing these texts and saying that the age they describe has begun. Matthew Henry sees this clearly: “When Christ shall come to set up his kingdom in the world, then wonders, great wonders, shall be wrought on men’s souls.” (Henry, Concise Commentary on the Whole Bible, on 35:5–7). Henry’s emphasis on souls is not a retreat from the physical healings but a recognition that the bodily signs are pointers to a deeper opening — the ears that hear the word and the tongue that praises.

Isaiah himself has prepared this double reading. In 6:9–10 the prophet’s own ministry hardened a people into blindness and deafness; in 29:18 “the deaf shall hear the words of a book, and out of their gloom and darkness the eyes of the blind shall see.” The disabilities of chapter 35 therefore carry the weight of Israel’s spiritual condition as well as the plain sense of bodies healed. Both are true at once, and John’s Gospel holds them together in the man born blind, whose physical sight and spiritual sight are given in the same chapter (John 9:1–41).

Redemptively, these verses locate us precisely: the age has dawned but is not complete. Christ healed, and Christ still heals; yet Paul left Trophimus ill (2 Timothy 4:20) and looked for the redemption of our bodies as a future hope (Romans 8:23). The signs are genuine down payments on a world where no eye is dark and no tongue is silent.

Application

Live in the “then” of this passage without collapsing it into “now” or postponing it entirely to “later.” The right response to verses 5–6 is confident prayer for healing joined to unembarrassed patience when healing does not come. Both belong to a people who know the age has begun and has not been consummated.

Take seriously the spiritual sense as well. If Isaiah’s deafness language describes Israel’s inability to hear God, then the ordinary Sunday miracle — a person who has heard sermons for years suddenly hearing one — is a fulfillment of this text, and worth as much thanksgiving as a physical cure. Pray for the unbelieving people you love in exactly this vocabulary: that their eyes would be opened, their ears unstopped (Acts 16:14; 2 Corinthians 4:6).

Notice too what the healed do with their new faculties. The mute tongue sings; the healed feet leap. Restoration in Isaiah issues in praise. If God has opened your eyes, the appropriate use of them is worship, and a Christian who receives mercy without becoming more audible in praise has not yet followed the text to its end.

Finally, let the passage shape how your congregation treats those who are still waiting. A church that only celebrates recoveries teaches its suffering members that they are exhibits of failure. Make room in your prayers, your testimonies, and your visiting for people whose bodies have not yet been mended, and speak to them of the day when they will leap like a deer.

A crucial warning against misapplication: these verses are not a promise that any believer with enough faith will be healed in this life, and they must never be handled in a way that tells a blind, deaf, or disabled brother or sister that their condition is a failure on their part. Isaiah is describing the age Christ inaugurated and will consummate, given in part now and in full then. Some of the most faithful Christians you will ever meet will die in wheelchairs. Speak this text to them as promise, never as accusation, and let the emphasis fall where Isaiah puts it — on the certainty of that day, not on the conditions for hastening it.

---

Section 4 — Water in the Haunt of Jackals (Isaiah 35:7)

Key Insight

Verse 6 has just announced that “waters break forth in the wilderness, and streams in the desert,” and verse 7 completes the picture: “the burning sand shall become a pool, and the thirsty ground springs of water; in the haunt of jackals, where they lie down, the grass shall become reeds and rushes.”

The Hebrew is exact and worth pausing on. Sharav is not simply hot sand; it is the shimmering mirage that hovers over the desert floor and promises water that is not there. Isaiah says the mirage will become a pool — the illusion made real, the desert’s cruelest joke turned into its truest gift. Alongside it stands tannim, jackals, the scavengers that inhabit ruins. Chapter 34 had left Edom precisely to such creatures (34:13–15). Here their den does not merely change owners; it becomes a marsh, a place of reeds and rushes, which cannot exist without permanent standing water. Matthew Poole draws out the botany with a plain eye: “Those dry and parched deserts, in which dragons have their abode, shall yield abundance of grass, and reeds, and rushes, which grow only in moist grounds.” (Poole, Annotations upon the Holy Bible, on 35:7). Poole’s observation is the whole argument in miniature — reeds are evidence. You cannot fake a marsh. The vegetation named is proof that the water has come to stay.

Water in Isaiah is never merely water. It is the standing image of the Spirit poured out: “I will pour water on the thirsty land, and streams on the dry ground; I will pour my Spirit upon your offspring” (44:3). It is the free gift of the gospel: “Come, everyone who thirsts, come to the waters” (55:1). And it flows from the sanctuary in the prophets’ vision of the age to come (Ezekiel 47:1–12), until it reaches “the river of the water of life” in the last chapter of the Bible (Revelation 22:1).

Christ takes this vocabulary and applies it to himself. “If anyone thirsts, let him come to me and drink” (John 7:37), spoken on the last day of the feast, the day of the water-drawing ceremony; and John adds that he was speaking of the Spirit. To the woman at the well he promises water becoming “a spring of water welling up to eternal life” (John 4:14), which is Isaiah’s springs in the desert placed inside a person.

The theology of the verse is therefore this: God does not relocate his people to better country. He transforms the country they are in. The place of desolation becomes the place of abundance, without changing its address. That is a pattern that runs to the cross, where the instrument of death becomes the means of life, and to the resurrection of the body, where the very ground of our humiliation is glorified.

Application

Take seriously that God works in place. The instinct in a barren season is to change the address — a new church, a new city, a new set of circumstances — and sometimes that is wise. But Isaiah’s promise is that the jackals’ den itself becomes a marsh. The hard place is not merely escaped; it is transfigured. Before you leave a difficult situation, ask whether God intends to bring water to it rather than move you away from it (1 Corinthians 7:17–24).

Second, treat thirst as an asset. The people in this verse are not congratulated for their resourcefulness; they are given water because they had none. Jesus blesses those who hunger and thirst for righteousness precisely because they will be filled (Matthew 5:6). If you are conscious of dryness this week, you are in the exact condition this promise addresses, and the appropriate response is to come and drink rather than to wait until you feel less parched.

Third, look for reeds. Poole’s point has pastoral force: growth of a certain kind is evidence of water underneath. When you see patience appearing in a formerly angry believer, or generosity in a formerly tight-fisted one, you are looking at proof that the Spirit has come to that soil. Learn to notice and name such evidence in others; it is one of the most encouraging things a Christian can do.

A warning against misapplication: this is not a promise that every dry situation will be visibly transformed on this side of the resurrection, nor a license to stay in a genuinely harmful place because God might change it. Isaiah’s marsh is an eschatological picture whose firstfruits we taste now. Some deserts in this life stay deserts until the Lord returns, and telling a suffering believer otherwise sets them up for a disappointment the text never promised.

---

Section 5 — The Way of Holiness (Isaiah 35:8–9)

Key Insight

“And a highway shall be there, and it shall be called the Way of Holiness; the unclean shall not pass over it. It shall belong to those who walk on the way; even if they are fools, they shall not go astray. No lion shall be there, nor shall any ravenous beast come up on it; they shall not be found there, but the redeemed shall walk there” (vv. 8–9).

The Hebrew maslul is a raised, built-up causeway, not a beaten track. Ancient kings constructed such roads for triumphal processions and for the carrying of divine images; Isaiah takes the imperial image and gives it to ransomed captives walking home. The road’s name is derek haqodesh, the Way of Holiness — a title, not a description of its surface. Calvin explains why the name matters: “Not without reason does the Prophet add that ‘the way shall be holy;’ for wherever there is a great multitude of men, innumerable vices and corruptions abound.” (Calvin, Commentary on Isaiah, on 35:8). A road full of travelers ordinarily means a road full of trouble; God guarantees that this one will not be corrupted by those who use it.

Two protections are named, and neither depends on the traveler. First, exclusion: “the unclean shall not pass over it.” Barnes puts it plainly: “The reason why it should be so called is stated; – no impure person should travel it.” (Barnes, Notes on the Bible, on 35:8). Barnes is pointing out that the road’s holiness is enforced, not merely aspired to. Second, safety from predators: “No lion shall be there, nor shall any ravenous beast come up on it.” The beasts that made ancient travel deadly, and that populated the ruin of chapter 34, are simply absent.

Then comes one of the kindest clauses in the book: “even if they are fools, they shall not go astray.” Barnes catches the reason: “It shall be a highway thrown up, so direct, and so unlike other paths, that there shall be no danger of mistaking it.” (Barnes, Notes on the Bible, on 35:8). The safety belongs to the road, not to the navigational skill of the traveler.

Gill states the Christological point plainly: “Not two ways, but one; the way shall be a highway, a way cast up, raised, and ‘elevated’; this is to be understood principally of Christ, the only way of life and salvation; and of the lesser paths of duty and ordinances.” (Gill, Exposition of the Bible, on 35:8). Gill sees that a single, unmistakable road on which no unclean thing may travel and no fool can get lost is finally a person: “I am the way, and the truth, and the life” (John 14:6). The unclean are excluded, and yet the unclean are the only travelers there are — which is why verse 9 calls them “the redeemed,” ge’ulim, bought back by a kinsman. They walk a holy road because they have been made clean, not because they were clean when they found it.

Application

Live on this road as a person who did not build it. The first practical effect of verses 8–9 is relief: your perseverance does not rest on your competence. Christians with anxious consciences spend years fearing they will take a wrong turn and be lost. Isaiah’s answer is that the road is so plainly cast up that even fools do not go astray, and Jesus’ answer is that no one snatches his sheep out of his hand (John 10:28). Let that settle you, and then walk.

The second effect is a call to holiness that is not anxious. The road is named for what it is, and the unclean do not travel it. This means that a professing Christian living in settled, unrepented uncleanness has reason to examine whether he is on the road at all (1 John 3:9–10). But note the order: cleansing comes first and travel follows, so the pursuit of holiness is a matter of walking consistently with what you have been made, not of qualifying for admission (1 Corinthians 6:11).

Third, use the exclusion of the beasts pastorally. Ancient travelers feared lions; modern believers fear a hundred things that might devour a faith. Peter says the adversary prowls like a roaring lion (1 Peter 5:8) — and Isaiah says no lion is on this road. Both are true: the enemy is real, and he has no standing on the way God has built.

A warning against misapplication: “even if they are fools, they shall not go astray” is not permission to be careless. It is the promise that God keeps his own, not a guarantee that doctrine and obedience are optional. Isaiah puts the clause immediately after “the unclean shall not pass over it,” so the same sentence that comforts the stumbling excludes the presumptuous. Take it as security for the weak, never as cover for the willful.

---

Section 6 — The Ransomed of the LORD Return to Zion (Isaiah 35:10)

Key Insight

The chapter ends where the road leads: “And the ransomed of the LORD shall return and come to Zion with singing; everlasting joy shall be upon their heads; they shall obtain gladness and joy, and sorrow and sighing shall flee away” (v. 10).

Every element is deliberate. The travelers are peduyei YHWH, defined not by their homeland or their tribe but by what God paid for them. Their movement is “return,” the word of repentance and of homecoming at once. Their destination is Zion, which means the road of verse 8 is not an aimless improvement of the desert but a route with an address. Their sound is singing, which is how this chapter began (v. 2) and how it ends. And the joy is simchat olam, everlasting joy — joy with a duration attached, “upon their heads” like a festal garland.

The last clause performs what it describes: “sorrow and sighing shall flee away.” The verb pictures grief in flight, routed like a defeated army; Isaiah does not say sorrow is explained or endured, but that it runs.

Calvin fastens on the certainty rather than the imagery: “The Prophet confirms the former doctrine, that God hath determined to redeem his people, and therefore that nothing can resist his decree.” (Calvin, Commentary on Isaiah, on 35:10). The whole chapter has been a series of promises with no stated conditions, and their guarantee is the divine purpose behind them.

Barnes locates the historical anchor: “The language here is all derived from the deliverance from Babylon, and the images employed by the prophet relate to that event.” (Barnes, Notes on the Bible, on 35:10). That is the first horizon, and it must not be erased. But Poole insists that the first horizon cannot hold the weight of the words. He writes that “which expressions are too magnificent and emphatical to be satisfied by the return of the Jews from Babylon to their own land,” and concludes that they “must necessarily be understood of gospel times, and of the joy and happiness purchased by Christ for his people, begun here, and continued to all eternity.” (Poole, Annotations upon the Holy Bible, on 35:10). Poole argues from the language itself: the return from Babylon was accompanied by tears and hardship, so a promise that sorrow and sighing flee away must reach further.

Isaiah agrees, repeating this verse almost word for word at 51:11; the same hope surfaces at 25:8, “He will swallow up death forever.” John hears the sentence completed in the new creation: “He will wipe away every tear from their eyes, and death shall be no more” (Revelation 21:4). Matthew Henry brings it home to the present: “Those who by faith are made citizens of the gospel Zion, rejoice in Christ Jesus; and their sorrows and sighs are made to flee away by Divine consolations.” (Henry, Concise Commentary on the Whole Bible, on 35:8–10). The ransomed have begun to sing already, on a road that has not yet reached the city.

Application

Learn to sing on the way. The travelers in verse 10 are singing before they arrive; their joy is a function of their destination, not of their present scenery. This is why Christian joy is not the same as good spirits and does not require favorable circumstances. Paul and Silas sang in a prison at midnight (Acts 16:25) because the road they were on had a known end.

Hold your sorrows in the light of the last clause. “Sorrow and sighing shall flee away” is not a denial of grief but a statement about its expiry date. Christians grieve, and grieve fully — but not as those without hope (1 Thessalonians 4:13). When you sit with someone in loss, this verse gives you something better than distraction: a promise that grief has an end which is not merely the end of the sufferer.

Let the word “ransomed” fix your identity. Not “the successful of the LORD,” not “the consistent of the LORD” — the ransomed. Whatever else was true of these travelers, a price had been paid for them, and that is what put them on the road. When your sense of yourself as a Christian wobbles, return to what was paid rather than to how you are doing (1 Peter 1:18–19).

Finally, keep Zion in view. A road with no destination becomes a treadmill. Set your mind on things above (Colossians 3:1–2), and let the certainty of arrival make the walking bearable.

A warning against misapplication: everlasting joy is promised to the ransomed at Zion, not guaranteed as a constant emotional state now. A believer weeping through a season of loss is not failing this verse; sorrow has not yet fled, and Scripture never pretends otherwise. Do not use verse 10 to hurry the grieving past their grief, and do not measure your standing before God by your current cheerfulness.

---

Cross References

Comparative Gospel Study

Not Applicable as Direct Comparison — Isaiah is an Old Testament prophetic salvation oracle in Hebrew poetry, not Gospel narrative, and it has no parallel accounts to harmonize. However, Isaiah 35:1–10 anticipates key Gospel themes:

The messianic signs as credentials. When John the Baptist sends from prison to ask whether Jesus is the one to come, Jesus answers with a catalogue drawn from this chapter: “the blind receive their sight and the lame walk, lepers are cleansed and the deaf hear” (Matthew 11:5; Luke 7:22). He does not claim a title; he cites Isaiah 35:5–6 and lets the fulfillment answer the question. The chapter therefore supplies the Gospels with their vocabulary for identifying the Messiah by what he does.

The way prepared in the wilderness. All four Gospels open John the Baptist’s ministry with Isaiah 40:3, the highway text that stands one link along the chain from 35:8. The Gospel writers assume that a road through the desert to God is the shape of salvation, and Jesus completes the motif by naming himself “the way” (John 14:6). The earliest Christians took the same name for their movement, “the Way” (Acts 9:2).

Water for the thirsty. The springs breaking out in the desert (35:6–7) become Jesus’ own invitation at the Feast of Booths: “If anyone thirsts, let him come to me and drink” (John 7:37), which John explains as a promise of the Spirit. The same imagery underlies his offer to the Samaritan woman of water becoming a spring welling up to eternal life.

Joy, homecoming, and the end of sorrow. The ransomed returning to Zion with everlasting joy (35:10) is the note the Gospels strike when the lost are found and heaven rejoices (Luke 15:7, 32), and it is the hope Jesus gives the disciples when he promises that their sorrow will turn into joy that no one takes from them (John 16:22).

Old Testament Connections

Pentateuch. The reversal of the curse runs beneath the whole chapter. Ground cursed to thorns in Genesis 3:17–18 here yields reeds and rushes; the covenant blessing of safety from wild beasts (Leviticus 26:6) is realized on the highway of 35:9. The two deliverance verbs of verses 9–10 are Pentateuchal: ga’al, the kinsman-redeemer’s duty (Leviticus 25:47–49), and padah, the ransom of the firstborn (Exodus 13:13). The road itself recalls the wilderness journey of Exodus, but with the deficiencies removed — water without murmuring, guidance without wandering, arrival without a generation lost.

Historical Books. Ruth 4:4–6 dramatizes the kinsman-redeemer whose title stands behind “the redeemed” of verse 9. The joyful ascent to Zion recalls the bringing up of the ark with singing (2 Samuel 6:14–15) and Solomon’s dedication of the temple as the place where God’s name dwells (1 Kings 8:29), which is what makes Zion a destination rather than merely a city.

Wisdom Literature. “Even if they are fools, they shall not go astray” reads against the whole of Proverbs, where the fool is precisely the one who will not stay on the path (Proverbs 14:12; 26:11). Isaiah does not lower the standard; he changes who guarantees the outcome. Psalm 126 shares the vocabulary of restored fortunes, sowing in tears and reaping with shouts of joy, and Psalm 84 gives the pilgrim road its classic expression: those who pass through the Valley of Baca make it a place of springs.

Major Prophets. Within Isaiah, the chapter is the bright panel answering chapter 34, reverses the withering of Lebanon, Sharon, and Carmel at 33:9, and reappears verbatim at 51:11. It belongs to a highway chain running through 11:16; 19:23; 40:3; 43:19; 49:11; 62:10. Jeremiah 31:8–13 describes the same homecoming with weeping turned to joy, and Ezekiel 47:1–12 supplies the temple river that turns desert into fruitfulness and salt water into fresh.

Minor Prophets. Joel 3:18 promises mountains dripping with sweet wine and a fountain from the house of the LORD watering the valley; Amos 9:13–15 pictures a restored land planted and never again uprooted; Zechariah 14:8 has living waters flowing out from Jerusalem. Each shares Isaiah’s conviction that the age to come is described most naturally in terms of water arriving where there was none.

New Testament Fulfillment

Gospels and Acts. Jesus explicitly claims Isaiah 35:5–6 in his answer to John the Baptist (Matthew 11:4–5; Luke 7:22), and the Gospels narrate its individual clauses: blind eyes opened (John 9:6–7), deaf ears unstopped (Mark 7:32–35), a lame man leaping (Acts 3:8, where the description deliberately echoes the prophet), and mute tongues loosed (Matthew 9:32–33). John 7:37–39 identifies the desert springs with the gift of the Spirit. The church’s earliest self-designation as “the Way” (Acts 9:2; 24:14) takes up the highway of verse 8.

Paul’s Epistles. Paul’s theology of redemption uses both of Isaiah’s words: we are justified “through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus” (Romans 3:24) and were “bought with a price” (1 Corinthians 6:20). Romans 8:19–23 places the flowering of the desert within the wider groaning of creation awaiting liberation, and 2 Corinthians 4:6 describes the opening of blind eyes as the God who said “Let light shine out of darkness” shining in our hearts. Colossians 3:1–4 supplies the pilgrim orientation of a people whose life is hidden with Christ and who walk toward a disclosure still to come.

General Epistles and Revelation. Hebrews 12:12 quotes Isaiah 35:3 directly to a discouraged congregation, and a few verses later declares that they “have come to Mount Zion” (Hebrews 12:22) — the destination of verse 10 claimed as present possession. 1 Peter 1:18–19 defines Christians as those ransomed with the precious blood of Christ. Revelation gathers the chapter’s close into the new creation: sorrow, crying, and pain are gone and every tear is wiped away (Revelation 21:4), a river of the water of life flows from the throne (Revelation 22:1), and nothing unclean ever enters the city (Revelation 21:27), which is the Way of Holiness arrived at its end.

Redemptive-Historical Context

Isaiah 35 traces the whole biblical storyline in ten verses, and it does so in the grammar of landscape.

Creation. The chapter’s imagery is drawn straight from Eden: a well-watered place, ground that yields abundantly, safety from predators, and the presence of God enjoyed without terror. Genesis 2:10 has a river flowing out of Eden to water the garden; Isaiah 35:6–7 has waters breaking out in the wilderness. The vision is not of a landscape improved beyond recognition but of a landscape restored to what it was made to be. Isaiah’s picture is emphatically physical — sand, pools, reeds, rushes, a road — because the redemption he foresees includes the material creation rather than rescuing souls out of it.

Fall. The desert is not a neutral fact but a consequence. Genesis 3:17–18 curses the ground with thorns and thistles, and Isaiah’s wilderness carries that curse in its very existence. Chapter 34 has just applied the vocabulary of Genesis 1:2 to Edom — the line of confusion and the plumb line of emptiness (34:11) — showing that judgment is a return toward the formless void. The blindness, deafness, lameness, and muteness of verses 5–6 are equally results of the fall, and Isaiah has already used them as figures for Israel’s covenant hardness (6:9–10). The chapter thus addresses both the cursed world and the cursed heart.

Redemption. Into this Isaiah announces a coming: “Behold, your God will come with vengeance, with the recompense of God. He will come and save you” (v. 4). The coming is singular and it accomplishes both judgment and rescue. In Christ this is realized in stages. He comes and does exactly what verses 5–6 specify, and points to those works as his credentials (Matthew 11:4–5). He is himself the road of verse 8 (John 14:6) and the ransom of verse 10 (Mark 10:45). The two verbs of verses 9–10, ga’al and padah, converge at the cross, where our kinsman pays the price. The immediate historical horizon — the return from Babylon — is real but insufficient; Poole’s judgment that the language is too magnificent to be satisfied by that return is simply an observation about the words on the page.

Consummation. The chapter’s destination has not yet been reached. Sorrow and sighing have not fled; blind eyes are still dark; deserts are still dry. Revelation takes up Isaiah’s final clause and completes it, with every tear wiped away, death abolished, the river flowing from the throne, and nothing unclean entering the city (Revelation 21:4, 27; 22:1). The already-and-not-yet tension is therefore built into the text as the church receives it: we walk a road that exists, in a body that still fails, singing a song about a city we have in one sense already reached (Hebrews 12:22) and in another sense still seek (Hebrews 13:14). The New Covenant gives us the Spirit as the springs in the desert now (John 7:37–39), the firstfruits of a harvest that will one day cover the whole ground.

---

Systematic Theology Connection

The Sovereignty of God in Salvation

Every verb of consequence in Isaiah 35 has God as its actual subject. The wilderness does not decide to bloom; glory “shall be given to it” (v. 2). The blind do not open their own eyes. The road is not worn by traffic but “cast up,” built by another. And the travelers are not volunteers but “the ransomed of the LORD,” people identified by a transaction God performed. Calvin’s comment on verse 10 states the ground of the whole chapter — that God has determined to redeem his people and nothing can resist his decree.

The Westminster Confession of Faith 3.1 confesses that God from all eternity did freely and unchangeably ordain whatsoever comes to pass, and WCF 5.1 that he upholds and governs all creatures and things by his most wise and holy providence. Isaiah 35 is that doctrine rendered as scenery: a chapter of unconditional promises with no “if” anywhere in it.

Practically, this is where the chapter’s comfort comes from. If the flowering of the desert depended on the desert, the promise would be worthless. Because it depends on God, a discouraged believer can be told “Be strong; fear not” without dishonesty. Sovereignty here is not an abstraction to be debated but the reason the weak hands of verse 3 can be strengthened at all.

The doctrine also disciplines our expectations. A sovereign God keeps his own timetable; the same chapter that guarantees the outcome says nothing about the date. Christians who believe in God’s sovereignty are therefore freed both from despair, since the end is fixed, and from presumption, since the schedule is not ours (Acts 1:7; Isaiah 46:9–10; Ephesians 1:11).

The Covenant of Grace

Isaiah 35 is covenant language throughout. The blessings restored — fertile ground, safety from wild beasts, joyful pilgrimage to the place of God’s name — are the blessings of Leviticus 26 and Deuteronomy 28, forfeited under the covenant curses and here given back. Crucially, they are given back without conditions attached. The chapter contains no terms for Israel to meet.

That is the shape of the covenant of grace. WCF 7.3 describes God freely offering sinners life and salvation by Jesus Christ, requiring faith and promising to give his Holy Spirit to all those ordained to life that they may be made willing and able to believe. WCF 7.5–6 insists that this is one covenant under two administrations, which is why a promise given to eighth-century Judah is claimed by a first-century congregation in Hebrews 12:12 without any sense of misappropriation.

The two redemption words of verses 9–10 are covenantal at root. Ga’al is a family obligation: the kinsman acts because of relationship. Padah is a price: the ransom is paid. Together they describe a God who binds himself to a people and then pays what that binding costs (Exodus 6:6; Titus 2:14).

The chapter also shows the covenant’s Mediator at work before he is named. The one who comes in verse 4 to save, the road of verse 8 on which the unclean may not travel, and the ransom price implied in verse 10 all converge on Christ, who is called the guarantor of a better covenant (Hebrews 7:22). Everything Isaiah promises here is held in his hands, which is why the promises can be unconditional without being cheap.

For believers, this means that the chapter’s promises are not a general optimism about history but the guaranteed content of a covenant sealed in Christ’s blood (Luke 22:20; Hebrews 8:6–13). What God has covenanted, he performs, and the covenant community may therefore read this ancient oracle as addressed to itself.

Effectual Calling

Verses 5–6 describe a change of faculties: eyes opened, ears unstopped, tongues loosed. Isaiah has already used exactly this vocabulary for spiritual inability — a people who “keep on hearing, but do not understand” (6:9) — and at 29:18 the deaf hear the words of a book. The physical signs therefore carry a doctrine: what dead faculties require is not persuasion but restoration.

This is effectual calling. WCF 10.1 confesses that God enlightens the minds of those he calls, spiritually and savingly, to understand the things of God, takes away their heart of stone, gives them a heart of flesh, renews their wills, and by his almighty power determines them to that which is good. WCF 10.2 adds that this calling is of God’s free and special grace alone, the person being altogether passive until quickened and renewed by the Holy Spirit.

Isaiah’s picture guards two things at once. It guards the necessity of grace: a deaf man contributes nothing to hearing. And it guards the reality of human response: the healed man leaps and sings. Effectual calling does not bypass the person; it repairs him so that he acts.

The practical implication is enormous for evangelism and prayer. We speak to people who cannot hear, and we ask God to do what the passage says he does (Acts 16:14; 2 Corinthians 4:6). It is also the ground of humility. Every Christian who understands the gospel is a formerly deaf person, and no one in the congregation opened his own ears.

Sanctification

The road of verse 8 is called the Way of Holiness, and its holiness is enforced: “the unclean shall not pass over it.” Yet its travelers are the redeemed — that is, people who were unclean and have been bought. The chapter therefore holds together definitive cleansing and ongoing walking, which is precisely the structure of sanctification.

WCF 13.1 confesses that those effectually called and regenerated, having a new heart and a new spirit created in them, are further sanctified really and personally through the virtue of Christ’s death and resurrection, the dominion of the whole body of sin being destroyed and the lusts of it more and more weakened and mortified. WCF 13.2–3 acknowledges that the work is imperfect in this life, with a continual and irreconcilable war remaining, yet through the continual supply of strength from the sanctifying Spirit the regenerate part overcomes.

Isaiah’s road makes the same two claims. It is genuinely holy — this is not a highway on which uncleanness is tolerated. And its travelers are genuinely fools who nevertheless do not go astray, which means the road’s keeping power is not a reward for their progress.

Practically, this rules out both license and despair. The believer walking the way does not treat holiness as optional, because the road has a name and bears the character of the God who built it. But neither does he conclude from his stumbling that he has lost the road, because the promise attaches to the way, not to his footing (Philippians 1:6; 1 Corinthians 6:11; Hebrews 12:14).

The Perseverance of the Saints

“Even if they are fools, they shall not go astray… No lion shall be there, nor shall any ravenous beast come up on it” (vv. 8–9). Two threats are removed — the traveler’s own incompetence and the predator’s attack — and neither is removed by the traveler. Barnes’ observation that the road is so direct and unlike other paths that there is no danger of mistaking it locates the security exactly where Isaiah puts it: in the construction of the way.

WCF 17.1 confesses that those whom God has accepted in his Beloved and effectually called and sanctified can neither totally nor finally fall away from the state of grace but shall certainly persevere to the end; WCF 17.2 grounds this not in their own free will but in the immutability of God’s decree, the merit and intercession of Christ, the abiding of the Spirit, and the nature of the covenant of grace.

The pastoral force is immediate. Christians who fear that a bad enough failure will finally put them off the road are told that fools travel this way and arrive. Jesus makes the same promise in his own words: his sheep “will never perish, and no one will snatch them out of my hand” (John 10:28).

Perseverance is not passivity. The verse still describes people walking, and the road still excludes the unclean. But it means the walking is sustained rather than self-generated, kept by the God who is able to present us blameless before the presence of his glory (Jude 24–25; Romans 8:38–39). The proper response is not carelessness but rest, and rest is what makes long obedience possible.

---

Reformed Theology

Reformed theology reads Isaiah 35 as a chapter of the covenant of grace announced in the vocabulary of new creation, and it finds in the passage several of its most characteristic emphases.

First, the monergism of the opening verses. Everything is done to the wilderness; nothing is done by it. Calvin’s comment on verse 1 — that having described the destruction of Edom the prophet now promises fertility to the wilderness so that barren and waste lands shall become highly productive — sets the pattern for the whole Reformed reading: the same sovereign word that unmakes remakes, and the material contributes nothing in either direction. The Westminster Confession’s account of providence (WCF 5.1) and of effectual calling (WCF 10.1–2) is the systematic form of what Isaiah paints.

Second, the unity of the covenant. Hebrews 12:12 takes Isaiah 35:3 and hands it to a Christian congregation without argument, and ten verses later tells them they have come to Mount Zion — the very destination of Isaiah 35:10. That move is only intelligible if the church is the continuation of the covenant people to whom Isaiah spoke, which is the Reformed position against a strict Israel/Church separation. WCF 7.5–6 states the principle: one covenant of grace, differently administered under law and gospel.

Third, typology handled with restraint. The return from Babylon is a real event and the chapter’s first horizon; Barnes is right that the imagery is derived from that deliverance. But Poole’s judgment that these expressions are too magnificent and emphatical to be satisfied by the return of the Jews from Babylon to their own land is the classic Reformed move — not allegorizing the historical referent away, but recognizing that the language overflows it and therefore points beyond it. Geerhardus Vos taught this as the semi-eschatological character of prophecy: the prophets see the near and the far as a single landscape, and the near deliverance is a genuine installment of the far. Meredith Kline’s work on the intrusion of the age to come into present history describes the same phenomenon from another angle.

Fourth, new creation as the goal of redemption. G. K. Beale argues that the whole biblical story moves toward a cosmic temple in which God dwells with a restored humanity, and Isaiah 35 is an early panel of that picture: water, garden, safety, and the glory of the LORD seen by his people. This is why the Reformed tradition resists a purely spiritualized reading of verses 6–7. The reeds and rushes are not decoration; they signal that God’s redemption reaches the material creation (Romans 8:19–23).

Fifth, the Christ-centeredness of the road. Gill’s reading — one way, not two, principally to be understood of Christ, the only way of life and salvation — is the tradition’s settled instinct. Sinclair Ferguson makes the related pastoral point that assurance rests on the person of Christ rather than on the strength of our grip on him, which is exactly what “even if they are fools, they shall not go astray” secures, and what WCF 17.2 confesses.

Finally, Israel and the church. Reformed theology reads the ransomed of verse 10 as the one people of God in both testaments, gathered from Israel and from the nations (Ephesians 2:11–22). The Zion they reach is not primarily a plot of ground but the city of the living God (Hebrews 12:22; Revelation 21:2). E. J. Young, Motyer, and Raymond Ortlund Jr. all read the chapter this way, and all resist detaching its glory from Christ, in whom the whole promise is Yes (2 Corinthians 1:20).

---

Dispensational Theology

Dispensational interpreters read Isaiah 35 as one of the clearest millennial passages in the Old Testament, and their reading follows consistently from a literal-grammatical hermeneutic applied to prophetic geography.

The governing principle, stated by Charles Ryrie as the consistent literal interpretation of Scripture, is that the place names in this chapter mean the places they name. Lebanon, Carmel, and Sharon are actual regions; the desert that blossoms is the actual desert of the land of Israel; the highway of verse 8 is a real road on real terrain. On this reading, Isaiah is describing a future transformation of the physical land of Israel during the earthly reign of Christ, when the topography and climate of the region are changed. The Scofield Reference Bible treats the chapter as a description of the kingdom age following the judgment of the nations in chapter 34, and the sequence of chapters 34 and 35 is taken as chronological: the day of the LORD’s vengeance on the nations, then the millennial blessing of the land.

John Walvoord argued that such promises were made to national Israel and must be fulfilled to national Israel, since God’s covenants with Abraham and David included territory and were unconditional in their land provisions. On this view, the return of verse 10 is not exhausted by the sixth-century return from Babylon, nor absorbed into the church, but awaits a future regathering of Israel to the land in the kingdom. J. Dwight Pentecost catalogued the millennial conditions described here — restored fertility, abundant water, the removal of dangerous beasts, safety in travel, and universal joy — and set them alongside parallel texts such as Isaiah 11:6–9, 65:17–25, Ezekiel 47:1–12, and Amos 9:13–15 as a coherent portrait of kingdom conditions.

The healings of verses 5–6 are read on the same principle. Dispensational writers grant that Jesus performed these works during his earthly ministry and cited them to John the Baptist (Matthew 11:4–5), and they typically explain those miracles as a genuine offer and preview of the kingdom to Israel. Because the offer was refused, the full realization of the chapter is understood as postponed to the millennial reign, when such conditions will be normal rather than occasional. Verse 8’s exclusion of the unclean is read as an actual regulation of access to a real highway leading to a rebuilt Jerusalem.

Progressive dispensationalists such as Craig Blaising and Darrell Bock have modified this framework considerably, allowing an inaugurated dimension in which Christ’s present reign already brings some blessings of the promised kingdom to the church, while maintaining a future territorial fulfillment for national Israel.

Points of agreement with the Reformed reading are worth naming honestly. Both traditions insist that the chapter is genuinely future in some respect, that its fulfillment is certain, that it is grounded in God’s unbreakable purpose, and that the physical creation is included in redemption rather than discarded. The disagreement concerns the identity of the people and the nature of the land. Reformed interpreters, following Hebrews 12:22 and Revelation 21, understand Zion as the city of the living God to which believing Jews and Gentiles come together, and the transformed landscape as the new heavens and new earth. Dispensational interpreters see a distinct national and territorial fulfillment for Israel preceding the eternal state. Both read the chapter as a promise God will certainly keep.

---

Bibliography

• Barnes, Albert. Notes on the Bible: Isaiah 35. Public domain.
• Beale, G. K. The Temple and the Church’s Mission and A New Testament Biblical Theology.
• Blaising, Craig A., and Darrell L. Bock. Progressive Dispensationalism.
• Calvin, John. Commentary on the Book of the Prophet Isaiah: Isaiah 35. Public domain.
• Ferguson, Sinclair B. The Whole Christ.
• Gill, John. An Exposition of the Old and New Testament: Isaiah 35. Public domain.
• Henry, Matthew. Concise Commentary on the Whole Bible: Isaiah 35. Public domain.
• Keil, C. F., and F. Delitzsch. Commentary on the Old Testament: Isaiah. Public domain.
• Kline, Meredith G. Kingdom Prologue.
• Motyer, J. Alec. The Prophecy of Isaiah: An Introduction and Commentary.
• Ortlund, Raymond C., Jr. Isaiah: God Saved Sinners.
• Oswalt, John N. The Book of Isaiah, Chapters 1–39 (NICOT).
• Pentecost, J. Dwight. Things to Come: A Study in Biblical Eschatology.
• Poole, Matthew. Annotations upon the Holy Bible: Isaiah 35. Public domain.
• Ryrie, Charles C. Dispensationalism.
• Scofield, C. I., ed. The Scofield Reference Bible.
• Sproul, R. C. The Holiness of God.
• Vos, Geerhardus. Biblical Theology: Old and New Testaments and The Pauline Eschatology.
• Walvoord, John F. The Millennial Kingdom.
• Webb, Barry G. The Message of Isaiah (The Bible Speaks Today).
• Westminster Confession of Faith and the Westminster Larger and Shorter Catechisms.
• Young, Edward J. The Book of Isaiah, 3 vols.