The Berean Table

Field	Value
Pericope	Jeremiah 42:1–22
Theme	The remnant that vows to obey whatever God says proves faithless when His word crosses their fears, and disobedience turns refuge into judgment.

---

Opening Prayer

---

Closing Prayer

---

Timeline Context

Jeremiah 42 stands in the narrative section that follows the fall of Jerusalem (Jeremiah 39–44), the tragic epilogue of Judah’s history in the land. The city fell to Nebuchadnezzar in 586 BC after an eighteen-month siege. The Babylonians deported most of the surviving population, but they left “some of the poor people who owned nothing” (Jeremiah 39:10) and appointed Gedaliah son of Ahikam as governor over them at Mizpah, a few miles north of the ruined capital. Jeremiah, released from his chains at Ramah, chose to remain with this remnant rather than accept comfortable asylum in Babylon (Jeremiah 40:1–6).

The fragile settlement lasted only a short time. Ishmael son of Nethaniah, a member of the royal family acting with Ammonite backing, assassinated Gedaliah and slaughtered the Babylonian garrison and many others at Mizpah (Jeremiah 41:1–3). Johanan son of Kareah pursued Ishmael, rescued the captives, and gathered the survivors at Geruth Chimham near Bethlehem — the staging point for a flight to Egypt (Jeremiah 41:16–18). The people were terrified that Nebuchadnezzar would avenge the murder of his appointed governor on the whole remnant.

At this moment of panic, Jeremiah 42 opens. The political horizon is dominated by two powers: Babylon under Nebuchadnezzar II (605–562 BC), the LORD’s appointed “servant” of judgment (Jeremiah 25:9), and Egypt under Pharaoh Hophra (Apries, 589–570 BC), the perennial false hope of Judah’s foreign policy (Isaiah 30:1–3; Ezekiel 29:6–7). Geographically the remnant stands at Bethlehem, on the road south; theologically they stand at a crossroads between faith and unbelief.

Redemptive-historically, the chapter tests whether the remnant will trust the covenant promise attached to the land. The LORD had said He would “build” and “plant” (Jeremiah 1:10; 24:6) those who submitted to His discipline under Babylon. Flight to Egypt is not merely bad strategy; it is a reversal of the exodus, an undoing of redemption itself (Deuteronomy 17:16; Hosea 8:13). The events of this chapter set up the final apostasy in Egypt (Jeremiah 43–44) and, by contrast, direct hope toward the exiles in Babylon (Jeremiah 24; 29), from whom the line of promise — and ultimately the Messiah — would come.

---

Historical-Grammatical Study

Genre. The chapter is prophetic narrative containing an embedded oracle of salvation and judgment. Verses 1–6 are narrative dialogue; verses 7–22 report the divine answer in classic prophetic form (“Thus says the LORD, the God of Israel,” v. 9), combining conditional promise (vv. 10–12), conditional threat (vv. 13–18), and prophetic indictment (vv. 19–22).

Key Hebrew elements.

• Tehinnah (“plea for mercy,” vv. 2, 9): from chanan, “to be gracious.” The people ask Jeremiah to let their “plea for mercy come before you” — supplication language drawn from temple piety (cf. 1 Kings 8:28–30), striking on the lips of people about to disobey.
• Ha-derek … ha-davar (“the way we should go, and the thing that we should do,” v. 3): the pairing of “way” and “word” frames the request as total guidance — direction and action alike.
• ‘Ed ’emet ve-ne’eman (“a true and faithful witness,” v. 5): covenant-lawsuit vocabulary. The people invoke the LORD as witness to their oath, making their later disobedience formal covenant perjury (cf. v. 20).
• Im-tov ve-im-ra’ (“whether it is good or bad,” v. 6): an idiomatic merism of totality — obedience regardless of how the answer strikes them.
• Banah / natash, nata’ / nathash (“build … not pull down; plant … not pluck up,” v. 10): the signature verbs of Jeremiah’s call (Jeremiah 1:10), here offered in pure grace to the remnant.
• Nicham (“I relent of the disaster,” v. 10): God’s turning from judgment upon repentance — the same verb as Jonah 3:10 — expressing His covenant readiness to show mercy without any change in His eternal purpose.
• Hit’etem be-nafshotekhem (“you have gone astray at the cost of your lives,” v. 20): literally “you have caused yourselves to err in your souls” — self-deception with fatal wages.

Background. In the ancient Near East, consulting a prophet or deity before migration or war was standard practice, and a ten-day oracular delay (v. 7) was not unusual; what is unusual is Israel’s covenant framework, in which the answer comes from the living God who also reads the inquirers’ hearts. Egypt had long been the refuge of Judean dissidents (1 Kings 11:40; Jeremiah 26:21–23), and Judean garrison communities existed in the Nile Delta and, later, at Elephantine. Deuteronomy explicitly forbade returning the people to Egypt (Deuteronomy 17:16; 28:68), so the proposed flight carries the theological weight of covenant reversal.

Covenantal patterns. The chapter replays the covenant’s blessing-and-curse structure (Deuteronomy 28): remain under God’s discipline and receive building and planting; flee in unbelief and the covenant curses — sword, famine, and pestilence (v. 17; cf. Jeremiah 14:12; 24:10) — will pursue you even outside the land. The people’s sworn oath (vv. 5–6) makes the episode a miniature covenant ceremony, immediately broken.

---

Expanded Outline

Section 1 — The Remnant Seeks a Word from the LORD (Jeremiah 42:1–3)

Key Insight

The scene opens with impressive unanimity: “all the commanders of the forces, and Johanan the son of Kareah and Jezaniah the son of Hoshaiah, and all the people from the least to the greatest, came near” (v. 1). The phrase “from the least to the greatest” is deliberate; the whole community, without exception, stands before the prophet. Their request is couched in the language of humble piety: “Let our plea for mercy come before you, and pray to the LORD your God for us” (v. 2). The word rendered “plea for mercy” (tehinnah) belongs to the vocabulary of the penitent — it is what Solomon asked God to hear from the temple (1 Kings 8:30) and what David poured out in the psalms (Psalm 6:9). Outwardly, this is a model prayer meeting.

Three features of the request deserve attention. First, they ask Jeremiah to pray “for all this remnant,” acknowledging their reduced state: “we are left but a few of many, as your eyes see us” (v. 2). The catastrophe has humbled their numbers, though — as the sequel shows — not their hearts. Second, they ask for comprehensive guidance: “that the LORD your God may show us the way we should go, and the thing that we should do” (v. 3). Way and deed together: they profess readiness to have God direct both their route and their conduct. Third, and ominously, they twice say “the LORD your God” (vv. 2, 3). Calvin observes that hypocrites readily honor God with titles while keeping Him at arm’s length; the pronoun quietly distances them from the God they claim to consult. Jeremiah will pointedly answer with “the LORD your God” (v. 4), pressing the covenant bond back upon them.

The deeper irony is situational. The remnant is already encamped at Geruth Chimham “intending to go to Egypt” (Jeremiah 41:17). The journey is planned; the caravan is packed. Their inquiry is therefore less a request for direction than a request for ratification. Scripture repeatedly exposes this counterfeit seeking: Balaam asking God a second time about Balak’s silver (Numbers 22:19), the elders who “set up idols in their hearts” before inquiring of Ezekiel (Ezekiel 14:3–4), those who honor God with lips while hearts are far from Him (Isaiah 29:13). The passage points forward to Christ, the greater Prophet and true Intercessor, who not only carries His people’s pleas to the Father (Hebrews 7:25) but, unlike this remnant, could say without pretense, “I always do the things that are pleasing to him” (John 8:29). Only in union with Him does prayer for guidance become honest.

Application

This section holds up a mirror to every believer who has ever prayed for guidance. The remnant’s words are flawless; their posture is humble; their request is specific. Yet God, who “looks on the heart” (1 Samuel 16:7), sees a decision already made. Before we ask God to show us the way, we must ask whether we are actually willing to walk in any way but the one we have chosen. Practically, this means examining ourselves at the front end of decisions: when we pray about a job, a move, a relationship, or a purchase, have we already signed the lease in our hearts? It also means welcoming the counsel of Scripture and the church even when it cuts against our preference (Proverbs 12:15). A healthy discipline is to name, out loud before God, the outcome we secretly want — honesty of that kind turns counterfeit inquiry into real prayer (Psalm 139:23–24). It is far better to be exposed at the praying stage than at the consequences stage, as this remnant was. Notice too that the remnant sought a mediator’s intercession; we have a better one. Because Christ intercedes for us (Romans 8:34), we may draw near with confidence rather than performance, asking the Father to conform our wills to His (Matthew 6:10; 26:39).

A warning against misapplication: this passage does not teach that seeking counsel or praying about decisions is hypocritical, nor that having preferences is sin. God invites us to make requests known to Him (Philippians 4:6). The sin exposed here is not desire but duplicity — using the forms of prayer to launder a settled rebellion. Do not let this chapter make you cynical about prayer for guidance; let it make you honest in it.

---

Section 2 — A Vow to Obey, Whether Good or Bad (Jeremiah 42:4–6)

Key Insight

Jeremiah’s reply is a model of pastoral integrity: “I have heard you. Behold, I will pray to the LORD your God according to your request, and whatever the LORD answers you I will tell you. I will keep nothing back from you” (v. 4). The prophet promises full transparency — no softening, no selective reporting. Matthew Henry notes that ministers are but messengers; their fidelity lies in delivering the whole counsel of God whether it pleases or provokes (cf. Acts 20:27). Jeremiah has suffered decades of abuse for exactly this fidelity, and he does not flinch now.

The people respond by escalating their piety into a formal oath: “May the LORD be a true and faithful witness against us if we do not act according to all the word with which the LORD your God sends you to us” (v. 5). The formula is covenantal and juridical: they summon God Himself as witness to their promise, invoking His courtroom against themselves in case of breach (cf. Genesis 31:50; 1 Samuel 12:5). The tragic irony is that the LORD will indeed prove “a true and faithful witness” — the very title given to the risen Christ (Revelation 3:14) — but as a witness against their perjury (cf. Malachi 3:5).

Verse 6 is the high-water mark of their profession: “Whether it is good or bad, we will obey the voice of the LORD our God to whom we are sending you, that it may be well with us when we obey the voice of the LORD our God.” For the first time they say “our God.” The merism “good or bad” professes obedience without conditions — pleasant answer or painful one. They even articulate sound covenant theology: obedience is the path of blessing, “that it may be well with us,” echoing Deuteronomy’s refrain (Deuteronomy 5:33; 6:3). On paper, this is everything God asks: “Obey my voice, and I will be your God” (Jeremiah 7:23).

Yet within days the same mouths will say, “You are telling a lie. The LORD our God did not send you” (Jeremiah 43:2). The passage therefore exposes the difference between a profession extracted by fear and a faith wrought by grace. Fear can produce vows; only a new heart produces obedience (Jeremiah 24:7; 32:39–40). Israel at Sinai said, “All that the LORD has spoken we will do” (Exodus 24:7), and broke the covenant within weeks. The chapter drives us to the One who alone kept His vow — Christ, who said, “I have come… not to do my own will but the will of him who sent me” (John 6:38) — and to the new covenant in which God writes the law on hearts rather than merely extracting oaths from lips (Jeremiah 31:33).

Application

Two lines of application flow from this section — one for those who speak for God, one for those who make promises to Him. First, Jeremiah’s “I will keep nothing back from you” (v. 4) sets the standard for every preacher, teacher, parent, and friend who handles God’s word. Faithfulness means delivering the unwelcome parts — sin, judgment, costly obedience — as clearly as the comforting parts. Pray for your pastors to have this courage, and receive hard words from them as kindness (Proverbs 27:6). Second, examine your own vows. Baptismal promises, membership vows, marriage vows, and the countless private resolutions of the Christian life are all easier to make than to keep. The remnant teaches us that the moment of promising feels sincere even when the heart is divided. So make vows soberly (Ecclesiastes 5:4–5), keep them by grace and not willpower, and when God’s answer to your prayers turns out “bad” — a closed door, a hard providence, a command that costs — remember that you pledged obedience before you knew the answer. Cultivate the habit of obeying in small unwelcome things, which trains the soul for large ones (Luke 16:10). Above all, keep returning to the Savior whose vows never failed, for His faithfulness — not ours — is the covenant’s foundation.

A warning against misapplication: do not conclude that vows and professions are worthless because they can be broken. Scripture commands and honors sworn commitment to God (Psalm 76:11); Christ’s church is built on public profession (Romans 10:9–10). The lesson is not to stop promising but to stop trusting the promise instead of the God who gives power to keep it (Philippians 2:12–13).

---

Section 3 — Ten Days of Waiting and the Promise of Life (Jeremiah 42:7–12)

Key Insight

“At the end of ten days the word of the LORD came to Jeremiah” (v. 7). The delay is theologically loaded. Jeremiah does not manufacture an oracle on demand; he waits until God speaks — a rebuke to every age’s demand for instant answers, and a mark of the true prophet over against the false prophets who “speak visions of their own minds” (Jeremiah 23:16). For the frightened remnant, camped within reach of feared Babylonian reprisals, ten days was an eternity. The wait was itself a test: would they trust God’s timing, or would fear harden their plan while they waited? Calvin comments that God often suspends His answers to try the patience and sift the sincerity of those who ask.

When the word comes, it is gathered to “all the people from the least to the greatest” (v. 8) — the same totality that made the request receives the answer; no one can later plead ignorance. The oracle’s first movement (vv. 9–12) is astonishing grace: “If you will remain in this land, then I will build you up and not pull you down; I will plant you, and not pluck you up” (v. 10). These are the signature verbs of Jeremiah’s commission (Jeremiah 1:10), which for forty years have run in the direction of plucking up and tearing down. Now, to a guilty remnant on conquered soil, God offers the constructive half of the prophet’s mandate. The land of judgment is to become a garden of new beginnings.

The ground of the promise is God’s own heart: “for I relent of the disaster that I did to you” (v. 10, nicham). The judgment is complete; God’s disposition toward the remnant is mercy (cf. Lamentations 3:31–33 — “he does not afflict from his heart”). Their one great fear is answered directly: “Do not fear the king of Babylon, of whom you are afraid. Do not fear him, declares the LORD, for I am with you, to save you and to deliver you from his hand” (v. 11). The command not to fear rests on the covenant formula of presence — the same “I am with you” spoken to Jeremiah at his call (Jeremiah 1:8, 19) and fulfilled ultimately in Immanuel, “God with us” (Matthew 1:23; 28:20). Verse 12 goes further: “I will grant you mercy, that he may have mercy on you” — the LORD stands sovereign over Nebuchadnezzar’s own emotions, turning the dreaded king’s heart like a watercourse (Proverbs 21:1). Safety, in other words, lies not in escaping the threat but in the God who rules it. Staying in devastated Judah with God is safer than fleeing to fortified Egypt without Him.

Application

This section teaches the discipline of waiting and the logic of fear. First, waiting: ten days of silence between request and answer is normal in the life of faith. God’s apparent delays are not neglect; they test and strengthen what prayer professes (Psalm 27:14; Lamentations 3:25–26). When you have prayed over a decision, resist the pressure — internal or external — to act before you have sought God fully in His word, in prayer, and in godly counsel. Fear always wants to shorten the wait; faith is willing to stand still until God opens the way (Exodus 14:13). Second, fear: God does not deny that Babylon is dangerous; He relocates the remnant’s security — “I am with you, to save you” (v. 11). The presence of God, not the absence of threat, is the believer’s safety. Name your own “king of Babylon” — the diagnosis, the layoff, the hostile person, the future you cannot control — and set against it the promises of presence: “Fear not, for I am with you” (Isaiah 41:10); “I will never leave you nor forsake you” (Hebrews 13:5–6). Third, notice where God offers to build and plant: in the ruins. God’s richest restoration often begins exactly where devastation happened — in the broken marriage, the humbled career, the grieving home — rather than in some imagined elsewhere.

A warning against misapplication: “remain in this land” was a specific command to that remnant, not a universal rule that relocation is unbelief. Moving cities, changing jobs, or emigrating is not sin; Scripture records God directing His people both to stay and to go (Genesis 12:1; Acts 8:1, 4). The abiding principle is to obey God’s revealed will and trust His presence — not to sanctify staying put as such.

---

Section 4 — The Warning: Egypt Means Sword, Famine, and Pestilence (Jeremiah 42:13–17)

Key Insight

The oracle now turns to the alternative the people are secretly nursing: “But if you say, ‘We will not remain in this land,’ disobeying the voice of the LORD your God and saying, ‘No, we will go to the land of Egypt, where we shall not see war or hear the sound of the trumpet or be hungry for bread, and we will dwell there‘” (vv. 13–14). God quotes their hearts before their mouths speak. The imagined Egypt is a sensory paradise of negations — no war seen, no trumpet heard, no bread lacking. It is a refugee’s fantasy: peace defined as the absence of every trigger of trauma. Understandable — these people have survived siege, famine, massacre, and abduction — yet the fantasy is faithless, because it seeks salvation by geography rather than by God.

The response comes with full covenantal solemnity: “Thus says the LORD of hosts, the God of Israel: If you set your faces to enter Egypt and go to live there, then the sword that you fear shall overtake you there in the land of Egypt, and the famine of which you are afraid shall follow close after you to Egypt, and there you shall die” (vv. 15–16). The idiom “set your faces” denotes settled determination (cf. Luke 9:51). The irony is exact and terrible: each feared evil is personified as a pursuer that hunts them to their hiding place. What you flee in unbelief, you meet. Egypt’s advertised immunities are reversed point for point: the place of “no war” becomes death by sword; the place of bread becomes death by famine; and to the pair God adds pestilence (v. 17), completing Jeremiah’s familiar triad of covenant curses (Jeremiah 14:12; 24:10; 29:17–18; cf. Deuteronomy 28:21–26). “They shall have no remnant or survivor from the disaster that I will bring upon them” (v. 17) — the remnant of the remnant will be cut off.

Beneath the geopolitics lies redemptive history. Egypt is the house of slavery out of which God redeemed Israel (Exodus 20:2); Deuteronomy forbade the king to “cause the people to return to Egypt” (Deuteronomy 17:16) and named a forced return to Egypt as the covenant’s final curse (Deuteronomy 28:68). To choose Egypt is to run redemption backwards — to un-exodus. History added its own confirmation: Nebuchadnezzar invaded Egypt (Jeremiah 43:10–13; 46:13–26), and Pharaoh Hophra, the remnant’s hoped-for protector, was given “into the hand of his enemies” (Jeremiah 44:30). As R.C. Sproul notes, the safest place in the world is the center of God’s will; the remnant sought safety everywhere else. The section ultimately points to Christ, who was carried down to Egypt and called out of it (Matthew 2:14–15; Hosea 11:1) to relive Israel’s story in perfect obedience — accomplishing in Himself the exodus (Luke 9:31, literally “his departure/exodus”) that unbelief here reverses.

Application

The remnant’s Egypt-fantasy — “where we shall not see war or hear the sound of the trumpet or be hungry for bread” (v. 14) — invites us to examine our own imagined havens. Fear paints pictures: the job where stress will finally stop, the church where no one will disappoint, the relationship or retirement or relocation where the trumpet will never sound. Faith does not deny the longing for peace; it refuses to believe that any created place or circumstance can supply what only God gives (Psalm 62:5–8). Practically: when you catch yourself thinking “if only I were there, then I’d be safe/happy/at rest,” treat the thought as a signal for prayer, not a map for flight. Test major decisions by asking not “where will I feel safest?” but “where can I obey God?” Remember too that consequences follow us: the person who flees a conflict rather than obeying Christ’s reconciliation commands (Matthew 5:23–24; 18:15) usually finds the same conflict waiting in the next church, the next marriage, the next city — the sword overtakes us there. And let the triad of sword, famine, and pestilence remind you that God’s warnings are mercies in advance; He tells us where death lies precisely because He desires life for us (Ezekiel 33:11).

A warning against misapplication: this text must not be twisted into a promise that obedient believers will be spared suffering, or that every hardship in your current location is punishment for a past move. Believers in God’s will still face sword and famine (Romans 8:35–37; Hebrews 11:36–38). The difference is not immunity but presence and outcome: nothing separates those who are in Christ from the love of God, wherever providence places them.

---

Section 5 — The Decision Already Made: Hypocrisy Exposed (Jeremiah 42:18–22)

Key Insight

The oracle closes by joining past judgment to present warning: “As my anger and my wrath were poured out on the inhabitants of Jerusalem, so my wrath will be poured out on you when you go to Egypt” (v. 18). The smoking ruins a few miles north are not merely a memory; they are a syllabus. The same holy wrath that emptied Jerusalem will follow covenant-breakers to the Nile. The fourfold hiss of the sentence — “an execration, a horror, a curse, and a taunt” (v. 18; cf. Jeremiah 24:9; 25:18; 29:18) — describes a people whose very name becomes a byword for judgment. “You shall see this place no more”: to abandon the land in unbelief is to forfeit it forever; the future belongs to the exiles in Babylon, not the fugitives in Egypt (Jeremiah 24:5–7; 29:10–14).

Then the pronouncement narrows to direct address: “The LORD has said to you, O remnant of Judah, ‘Do not go to Egypt.’ Know for a certainty that I have warned you this day” (v. 19). The command could not be plainer — four Hebrew words have settled the inquiry. And now Jeremiah, reading their faces or divinely enabled to read their hearts, exposes what has been true all along: “you have gone astray at the cost of your lives. For you sent me to the LORD your God, saying, ‘Pray for us…’… and I have this day declared it to you, but you have not obeyed the voice of the LORD your God in anything that he sent me to tell you” (vv. 20–21). The Hebrew of verse 20 (hit’etem be-nafshotekhem) carries the sense of self-deception at soul-cost: they have deceived themselves fatally. Note the tense: before they take a single step toward Egypt, God declares that they “have not obeyed” — the disobedience was complete when the heart resolved on it (cf. Matthew 5:21–28, where Jesus locates sin in the heart’s intention). Their pious inquiry, their solemn oath, their ten days of waiting were theater; as Matthew Henry observes, they would have been glad of a word to confirm them in their own way, but a word crossing their way they had determined to refuse.

The chapter ends where prophetic faithfulness must: “Now therefore know for a certainty that you shall die by the sword, by famine, and by pestilence, in the place where you desire to go to live” (v. 22). The final clause is the epitaph of all unbelief — death precisely in the place chosen for life (cf. Proverbs 14:12). Against this dark certainty stands the bright one of the gospel: Christ, the obedient Son who never sought life on His own terms, went down into death itself to give life to self-deceived rebels (John 10:10; Romans 5:19). The remnant’s exposure is our invitation to be exposed now, by the Word “discerning the thoughts and intentions of the heart” (Hebrews 4:12–13), while mercy still speaks.

Application

Verses 19–22 press one great duty: let God’s word expose you before consequences do. The remnant maintained impeccable religious appearances right up to the moment of open rebellion; only the prophetic word named the settled disobedience underneath (v. 21). We need the same exposure, and God has appointed means for it: Scripture read prayerfully and preached faithfully “discerning the thoughts and intentions of the heart” (Hebrews 4:12), self-examination (2 Corinthians 13:5; Psalm 139:23–24), and honest brothers and sisters who “exhort one another every day… that none of you may be hardened by the deceitfulness of sin” (Hebrews 3:13). Practice inviting that exposure: ask someone who knows you well whether your stated openness to God’s will in a current decision matches what they observe. Take warnings seriously the first time — “know for a certainty that I have warned you this day” (v. 19) implies that warnings heard and refused become witnesses against us (Luke 12:47–48). And when the word does expose a decided heart, the remedy is not despair but repentance: unlike the remnant, we stand under an open invitation — “if we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us” (1 John 1:9). The tragedy of Jeremiah 42 is not that exposure came, but that exposure was refused.

A warning against misapplication: do not wield this passage against others as a tool of suspicion, treating every believer’s hard decision as concealed rebellion, or every delay in clarity as hypocrisy. Jeremiah spoke by revelation; we do not read hearts (1 Corinthians 4:5). The text’s edge points first at the reader’s own breast. Judge yourself rigorously and others charitably.

---

Cross References

Comparative Gospel Study

Not Applicable as Direct Comparison — Jeremiah is an Old Testament prophetic book, and chapter 42 is prophetic narrative containing an oracle, not Gospel narrative. However, Jeremiah 42 anticipates key Gospel themes:

The greater Prophet who speaks God’s word without reserve. Jeremiah’s “I will keep nothing back from you” (v. 4) anticipates Christ, the Prophet like Moses (Acts 3:22–23), who declared, “all that I have heard from my Father I have made known to you” (John 15:15). Where Jeremiah delivered the word and was rejected, Jesus is the Word made flesh (John 1:14), rejected by His own (John 1:11), whose message likewise divided hearers into doers and refusers (Matthew 7:24–27).

Lip-honor exposed by heart-knowledge. The remnant’s pious inquiry masking a settled will anticipates Jesus’ confrontation with hypocrisy: “This people honors me with their lips, but their heart is far from me” (Matthew 15:8, citing Isaiah 29:13). Like Jeremiah in verse 20, Jesus “knew what was in man” (John 2:25) and exposed decisions already made beneath religious questions (Mark 10:17–22; John 6:26).

The vow made and broken. “Whether it is good or bad, we will obey” (v. 6) followed by refusal foreshadows Peter’s “I will never fall away” (Matthew 26:33–35) followed by denial — and the Gospels’ insistence that only grace, not resolve, keeps disciples (Luke 22:31–32; John 21:15–19).

Presence as the answer to fear. “Do not fear… for I am with you, to save you” (v. 11) anticipates the Gospel’s frame: the Son named Immanuel, “God with us” (Matthew 1:23), who stills fear with “It is I; do not be afraid” (John 6:20) and pledges, “I am with you always” (Matthew 28:20).

Losing life by saving it. The remnant sought life in Egypt and found death “in the place where you desire to go to live” (v. 22), anticipating Jesus’ paradox: “whoever would save his life will lose it, but whoever loses his life for my sake will save it” (Luke 9:24).

Old Testament Connections

Pentateuch. The prohibition of returning to Egypt (Deuteronomy 17:16) and the curse of forced return (Deuteronomy 28:68) frame the remnant’s flight as covenant reversal. The triad of sword, famine, and pestilence descends from the covenant curses (Leviticus 26:23–26; Deuteronomy 28:21–26). Israel’s oath at Sinai — “All that the LORD has spoken we will do” (Exodus 24:7) — and its swift breach (Exodus 32) prefigure verses 5–6 and 43:2. The wilderness generation’s longing to return to Egypt (Numbers 14:3–4) is the remnant’s ancestral sin.

Historical Books. The fall of Jerusalem and Gedaliah’s governorship and murder (2 Kings 25:22–26) provide the immediate backdrop; 2 Kings 25:26 records the flight to Egypt in a single verse that Jeremiah 41–43 expands. Saul’s failure to wait for Samuel (1 Samuel 13:8–14) parallels the test of the ten days. Solomon’s temple prayer gives the vocabulary of “plea” (tehinnah) the people borrow (1 Kings 8:28–30). Jeroboam’s flight to Egypt (1 Kings 11:40) illustrates Egypt’s standing role as political refuge.

Wisdom Literature. “There is a way that seems right to a man, but its end is the way to death” (Proverbs 14:12) is verse 22 in aphorism. “Trust in the LORD with all your heart… and he will make straight your paths” (Proverbs 3:5–6) states the obedient alternative. The king’s heart as a stream in the LORD’s hand (Proverbs 21:1) undergirds the promise of Babylonian mercy (v. 12). Psalm 40:1 and Psalm 27:14 commend the waiting the remnant refused; Psalm 91 celebrates the refuge they rejected.

Major Prophets. Isaiah’s oracles against the Egyptian alliance — “Woe to those who go down to Egypt for help” (Isaiah 31:1; cf. 30:1–3, 15) — are the classic parallel: Egypt “is man, and not God” (Isaiah 31:3). Within Jeremiah, chapter 24 (good and bad figs), 29:10–14 (the future with the exiles), 43–44 (the apostasy in Egypt and its judgment), and 46:13–26 (Nebuchadnezzar’s conquest of Egypt) complete this chapter’s storyline. Ezekiel 29:6–7 indicts Egypt as a “staff of reed” that pierces the hand that leans on it; Ezekiel 14:1–11 exposes inquirers with idols in their hearts.

Minor Prophets. Hosea threatens covenant-breakers with return to Egypt (Hosea 8:13; 9:3, 6) and supplies the reversal text Matthew applies to Christ: “Out of Egypt I called my son” (Hosea 11:1). Jonah embodies flight from God’s word and its futility (Jonah 1:3–4). Joel 2:13 and Jonah 3:10 illuminate the divine “relenting” of verse 10. Zechariah 7:11–13 describes the refusal to hear that turns prayer itself unanswerable.

New Testament Fulfillment

Gospels/Acts. Christ is the obedient Son called out of Egypt (Matthew 2:14–15), reliving Israel’s story without Israel’s rebellion. He is Immanuel, the “I am with you” in person (Matthew 1:23; 28:20). His Gethsemane prayer — “not as I will, but as you will” (Matthew 26:39) — is the sincere form of the remnant’s counterfeit vow (v. 6). He exposes hearts as Jeremiah did (John 2:24–25; Mark 7:6) and weeps over a city that, like this remnant, “would not” (Matthew 23:37). Acts presents Him as the Prophet whom to refuse is to be “destroyed from the people” (Acts 3:22–23) — the New Testament edge of verse 22.

Paul’s Epistles. Romans 6:17 and Ephesians 6:6 define the from-the-heart obedience the remnant lacked; Romans 12:2 answers verse 6’s dilemma by promising that the surrendered mind discerns God’s will as “good and acceptable and perfect.” Philippians 4:6–7 replaces flight with prayer as the believer’s response to fear. Galatians 3:13 announces that Christ bore the covenant curse — the theology beneath sword, famine, and pestilence — “for us.” 2 Corinthians 1:20 presents Christ as the “Yes” to every promise the remnant forfeited; Romans 8:31–39 grounds the fearlessness verse 11 commands.

General Epistles/Revelation. Hebrews is this chapter’s great echo chamber: “Today, if you hear his voice, do not harden your hearts” (Hebrews 3:7–15); the word “discerning the thoughts and intentions of the heart” (Hebrews 4:12–13); the peril of refusing “him who is speaking” (Hebrews 12:25); and the antidote to Egypt-trust: “I will never leave you nor forsake you… The Lord is my helper; I will not fear” (Hebrews 13:5–6). James 1:6–8 names the “double-minded man, unstable in all his ways,” and James 4:13–15 rebukes plans made without “if the Lord wills.” Revelation 3:14 crowns Christ as “the faithful and true witness” — the title the remnant invoked in vain (v. 5).

Redemptive-Historical Context

Jeremiah 42 sits at a devastating hinge in redemptive history, and its meaning unfolds along the whole Creation → Fall → Redemption → Consummation arc.

Creation and Fall. God made humanity to live by His word in His place under His blessing (Genesis 2:15–17); the Fall was precisely the choice of self-determined “good” over God’s spoken will (Genesis 3:1–6). Jeremiah 42 is Eden’s pattern replayed by a nation’s remnant: the word of God plainly given (“Do not go to Egypt,” v. 19), a competing vision of the good promising life (“where we shall not see war,” v. 14), and the fatal grasp — death “in the place where you desire to go to live” (v. 22). The chapter thereby diagnoses the fallen heart everywhere: “the heart is deceitful above all things” (Jeremiah 17:9), and “you have gone astray at the cost of your lives” (v. 20) is Adam’s epitaph as well as Judah’s.

Redemption promised and pictured. Against the darkness, verse 10 shines with redemptive intent: “I will build you up… I will plant you… for I relent of the disaster.” Even after the covenant curses have fallen, God’s posture toward a submissive remnant is construction, not demolition — the same grace that preserved a seed through the flood, a family through famine, and a stump through felling (Isaiah 6:13). The land-remnant refused this grace, but God’s building-and-planting purpose did not fail; it ran through the exiles in Babylon (Jeremiah 24:5–7; 29:10–14), through the return under Cyrus, and down the genealogy of Matthew 1 to Jesus the Messiah. Christ gathers the whole chapter into Himself: He is the Prophet who keeps nothing back (John 15:15), the true Israel who goes down to Egypt and is called out in perfect obedience (Matthew 2:15), the covenant-keeper whose “not my will, but yours” (Luke 22:42) makes good every broken vow, and the Curse-bearer upon whom sword, famine-forsakenness, and wrath converged at the cross (Galatians 3:13; Matthew 27:46). In His resurrection, God “builds and plants” beyond all pulling down (John 2:19–21).

Already / not yet. The church now lives the remnant’s test in the tension of the ages. Already the new covenant promised through Jeremiah is inaugurated: the law written on hearts, sins remembered no more (Jeremiah 31:31–34; Hebrews 8:8–12), the Spirit given so that obedience “whether good or bad” becomes possible and increasingly actual (Ezekiel 36:27; Romans 8:4). Yet not yet fully: believers still hear “Today, if you hear his voice, do not harden your hearts” (Hebrews 3:15), still battle the Egypt-instinct toward visible refuges, and still need warnings as real means of persevering grace (Hebrews 12:25).

Consummation. The arc ends where the remnant would not go: in a secured land with a secured people. “They shall be my people, and I will be their God… I will make with them an everlasting covenant, that I will not turn away from doing good to them” (Jeremiah 32:38–40) reaches its horizon in the new creation, where “the dwelling place of God is with man” (Revelation 21:3), fear and famine are abolished (Revelation 7:16–17), and no one will ever again seek life in Egypt, because the Lamb Himself is the light and life of the city (Revelation 21:22–27).

---

Systematic Theology Connection

The Providence of God

Jeremiah 42 displays God’s providence governing nations, hearts, and consequences. The LORD who “relents of the disaster” (v. 10) also promises to bend Nebuchadnezzar’s disposition: “I will grant you mercy, that he may have mercy on you and let you remain in your own land” (v. 12) — the emperor’s clemency lies in God’s hand (Proverbs 21:1). Conversely, providence guarantees that sword and famine will “overtake” and “follow close after” the disobedient into Egypt (v. 16); there is no square mile outside God’s government. The Westminster Confession of Faith 5.1 teaches that God “doth uphold, direct, dispose, and govern all creatures, actions, and things,” and WCF 5.6 solemnly adds that God sometimes gives hardened sinners over to their own lusts — precisely the remnant’s trajectory. Practically, this doctrine demolishes the calculus of fear: if providence rules Babylon, then obedience in a dangerous place is safer than disobedience in a fortified one. The believer’s security is never geographic but theological — “I am with you, to save you” (v. 11). It also dignifies ordinary decisions: because God governs outcomes, we are freed to choose obedience and leave results to Him (Psalm 37:5; 1 Peter 4:19). And it warns: providence is not a safety net under rebellion; the same government that shelters the obedient pursues the defiant (Amos 9:2–4). The remnant treated Egypt as a realm beyond God’s reach and discovered that His writ runs to the ends of the earth. Cross-references: Genesis 50:20; Psalm 33:10–11; Isaiah 46:9–10; Daniel 4:34–35; Acts 17:26–28; Romans 8:28.

Total Depravity

The chapter is a clinical study in the deceitfulness of the fallen heart. The remnant performs every external act of piety — approaching the prophet, pleading for intercession, vowing total obedience, waiting ten days — while harboring a fixed contrary will, so that God can say before they march, “you have not obeyed the voice of the LORD your God in anything” (v. 21) and “you have gone astray at the cost of your lives” (v. 20). This is Jeremiah 17:9 dramatized: “The heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately sick; who can understand it?” Depravity here is not the absence of religion but the corruption of it — the will using worship’s forms to pursue its own ends. The Westminster Confession of Faith 6.4 describes fallen humanity as “utterly indisposed, disabled, and made opposite to all good,” and WCF 9.3 denies to the natural will any ability to convert itself; the Larger Catechism Q. 149 confesses that no one can perfectly keep the commandments but daily breaks them “in thought, word, and deed.” The practical implications are searching: never trust the heart’s self-report (Proverbs 28:26); build examination by Scripture and community into every major decision (Hebrews 3:13); and despair of self-reformation in favor of crying for the new heart God promises (Jeremiah 24:7). Depravity rightly grasped is the doorway to grace rightly prized, for only those who distrust their own hearts will flee to the heart-renewing mercy of God in Christ. Cross-references: Genesis 6:5; Psalm 51:5; Isaiah 29:13; Mark 7:21–23; Romans 3:10–18; Ephesians 2:1–3.

The Word of God as a Means of Grace

Everything in Jeremiah 42 turns on the spoken word of God: requested (v. 3), promised without reserve (v. 4), awaited ten days (v. 7), delivered whole (vv. 9–22), and refused (43:2). The chapter therefore teaches both the sufficiency and the efficacy-in-two-directions of the word: to the submissive it is a word of building and planting (v. 10); to the resistant, the very warning becomes a witness for the prosecution — “know for a certainty that I have warned you this day” (v. 19; cf. 2 Corinthians 2:15–16). The Westminster Confession of Faith 1.6 confesses that “the whole counsel of God” is given in Scripture, sufficient for faith and life, and Shorter Catechism Q. 89 teaches that the Spirit makes “the reading, but especially the preaching, of the Word an effectual means of convincing and converting sinners.” Jeremiah’s ministerial model — “I will keep nothing back from you” (v. 4) — binds preachers to the whole counsel (Acts 20:27) and hearers to receive it “not as the word of men but as what it really is, the word of God” (1 Thessalonians 2:13). Practically: attend the preached word expecting God to speak; refuse the consumer posture that shops for confirming oracles; and treat every conviction under the word as “today’s” summons (Hebrews 3:15; 4:12), for hearing without doing builds on sand (Matthew 7:26–27; James 1:22–25). The remnant’s ruin began not when they marched for Egypt but when they resolved to hear the word selectively. Cross-references: Deuteronomy 8:3; Isaiah 55:10–11; Luke 8:15; Romans 10:14–17.

The Covenant of Grace

Jeremiah 42 is covenant theology in narrative form. The people’s oath invoking the LORD as “a true and faithful witness” (v. 5), the conditional blessing of building and planting (v. 10), the curse-triad of sword, famine, and pestilence (v. 17; Leviticus 26; Deuteronomy 28), and the fatal reversal of the exodus (Deuteronomy 17:16; 28:68) all presuppose the covenant God cut with Israel — an administration of the one covenant of grace (WCF 7.5–6). Even after national judgment, God deals with the remnant covenantally: mercy offered on the ground of His own relenting (v. 10), wrath threatened for willful breach (v. 18). The Westminster Confession of Faith 7.3 teaches that in the covenant of grace God “freely offereth unto sinners life and salvation by Jesus Christ, requiring of them faith in him” — and this chapter shows what covenant grace looks like when refused: the offer was real, the refusal culpable, the fault entirely in the refusers (cf. Ezekiel 33:11). The chapter also drives forward to the new covenant Jeremiah has already announced (Jeremiah 31:31–34): a covenant that succeeds where verse 6’s vow failed, because God Himself supplies the obedience He requires, writing the law on hearts and pledging, “I will not turn away from doing good to them… I will put the fear of me in their hearts” (Jeremiah 32:40). Practical implications: rest your standing on God’s covenant faithfulness in Christ, not your vows; and use the sacraments and promises as God’s oath to you, not merely yours to Him. Cross-references: Genesis 17:7; Exodus 24:7–8; Luke 22:20; Hebrews 8:6–13; 13:20–21.

The Perseverance of the Saints and the Reality of Apostasy

Jeremiah 42–43 presents a people who professed everything and persevered in nothing: a solemn oath of unconditional obedience (vv. 5–6) collapsing within days into open defiance (43:2–4). Scripture explains such collapses not as the loss of true grace but as the exposure of its absence: “They went out from us, but they were not of us; for if they had been of us, they would have continued with us” (1 John 2:19). The Westminster Confession of Faith 17.1 promises that those effectually called and sanctified “can neither totally nor finally fall away from the state of grace,” while WCF 18.1 warns that hypocrites “may vainly deceive themselves with false hopes and carnal presumptions.” The remnant’s fear-born vow is precisely such presumption — stony-ground reception that springs up quickly and withers when the word’s cost appears (Matthew 13:20–21). The doctrine’s comfort and its warning belong together: God preserves His people through means, including the very warnings this chapter models (Hebrews 3:12–14; 12:25), so that the elect hear “Do not go to Egypt” and, by grace, do not go. Practically: do not measure your state by the intensity of past professions but by present submission to God’s word (2 Corinthians 13:5); treat warnings as grace, not threats to assurance; and anchor perseverance where Jeremiah anchors it — in God’s pledge, “I will put the fear of me in their hearts, that they may not turn from me” (Jeremiah 32:40). Those who endure do so because God holds them, not because their vows were stronger. Cross-references: John 10:27–29; Philippians 1:6; Hebrews 6:4–9; 10:39; 1 Peter 1:5.

The Attributes of God: Truthfulness and Omniscience

Two divine perfections structure this chapter. First, God’s truthfulness: the people invoke the LORD as “a true and faithful witness” (v. 5), and He proves to be exactly that — faithful to His promise of mercy for the obedient (vv. 10–12) and faithful to His threat against the rebellious (vv. 16–18, 22; fulfilled in Jeremiah 44). “God is not man, that he should lie” (Numbers 23:19); His word never falls to the ground in either direction (Joshua 23:14–15). Second, God’s omniscience, particularly His heart-knowledge: before the remnant announces any decision, God quotes their inner speech — “if you say, ‘We will not remain in this land’” (v. 13) — and declares their disobedience already actual (vv. 20–21). “I the LORD search the heart and test the mind” (Jeremiah 17:10); “no creature is hidden from his sight” (Hebrews 4:13). The Westminster Confession of Faith 2.1 confesses God to be “most true” and 2.2 declares His knowledge “infinite, infallible, and independent upon the creature.” Practically, these attributes end all religious performance: prayers calculated for appearance address a God who hears intentions (Psalm 139:1–4). They also stabilize faith: every promise carries the full weight of a God who cannot lie (Titus 1:2; Hebrews 6:17–18), so that assurance rests not on the strength of our grip but on the truthfulness of the Promiser. And they make warnings kind: an omniscient God warns only of dangers that are real, and a truthful God never threatens what He does not mean. Cross-references: 1 Samuel 16:7; Psalm 33:4; John 2:24–25; Revelation 3:14; 19:11.

---

Reformed Theology

Reformed theology reads Jeremiah 42 as a chapter about the covenant of grace administered through the word, and about the difference between external membership in the covenant community and the internal, effectual grace that produces obedience. The remnant possesses every external privilege — the prophet in their midst, access to intercession, a plain oracle from God — yet perishes in unbelief. This is Paul’s distinction embodied: “not all who are descended from Israel belong to Israel” (Romans 9:6), and the Westminster distinction between the visible church and the invisible (WCF 25.1–2). The people’s flawless vow (vv. 5–6) followed by flat refusal (43:2) illustrates why the Reformed tradition insists that saving faith is God’s gift wrought by effectual calling, not a product of religious crisis: fear can generate profession, but only regeneration generates perseverance (John 3:3–8; WCF 10.1–2).

The chapter’s conditional structure — remain and be built, flee and die — raises the covenant’s law-and-promise dynamic. Geerhardus Vos taught that the covenant’s conditions are real without making grace uncertain: God works obedience in His elect through the very warnings and promises He issues. Jeremiah 42 supplies the negative proof: the warning was a genuine means of grace, and its refusal a genuine, culpable act — yet nothing in God’s redemptive purpose failed, for His building-and-planting program had already been lodged with the exiles in Babylon (Jeremiah 24:5–7; 29:10–14). Calvin, commenting on this chapter, presses the people’s hypocrisy: they wished God to be the author of their counsel only if He subscribed to it — a perpetual temptation of the visible church. Matthew Henry draws the pastoral lesson that many “pretend to consult God’s will who are resolved to follow their own.”

Typologically, the chapter is rich. Egypt functions as the standing figure of salvation-by-sight — refuge in what is “man, and not God” (Isaiah 31:3) — over against faith in the promised presence (“I am with you,” v. 11). The prohibited return to Egypt (Deuteronomy 17:16) marks flight as redemption reversed, and so points by contrast to Christ, who entered Egypt under the covenant curse’s shadow and was called out as the true Son (Matthew 2:15; Hosea 11:1), accomplishing the final exodus at Jerusalem (Luke 9:31). G.K. Beale has shown how such reversed-exodus and new-exodus patterns bind the Testaments together; Jeremiah 42–44 is a dark panel in that larger canvas. On the Israel/Church question, the Reformed reading sees one people of God: the believing remnant theology of Jeremiah (24:7; 31:33) flows without break into the church, “the Israel of God” (Galatians 6:16), heirs of the new covenant this very prophet announced (Hebrews 8:8–12).

Pastorally, Sinclair Ferguson reminds us that the Spirit unites us to Christ so that His obedience — “not my will, but yours” — becomes both our righteousness and, progressively, our disposition. R.C. Sproul‘s dictum that God’s sovereignty extends to every maverick molecule finds narrative form in verse 16: sword and famine obey God even in Egypt. And Spurgeon‘s counsel stands as the chapter’s application: it is better to trust and be still than to flee and be found by what we fled.

---

Dispensational Theology

A Dispensational reading of Jeremiah 42, governed by a consistently literal-grammatical hermeneutic, takes the chapter as straightforward history with abiding significance for national Israel. The remnant is literal Judah in 586 BC; the land is the literal land promised under the Abrahamic covenant (Genesis 15:18–21); Egypt and Babylon are the literal powers of the day. The oracle’s conditions were fulfilled to the letter — those who fled died by sword, famine, and pestilence in Egypt (Jeremiah 44:11–14, 27–30), and Nebuchadnezzar duly invaded Egypt (Jeremiah 43:10–13; 46:13–26) — a showcase of the precision of predictive prophecy that dispensational interpreters from C.I. Scofield onward have emphasized as the pattern for reading all prophecy, including the unfulfilled.

Dispensationalists locate the chapter in the dispensation of law, during the “times of the Gentiles” (Luke 21:24) inaugurated by Nebuchadnezzar’s supremacy. Judah’s discipline — including this remnant’s destruction — operates under the Mosaic covenant’s cursing provisions (Deuteronomy 28), but, crucially, it does not annul the unconditional national promises. Charles Ryrie‘s sine qua non — the consistent distinction between Israel and the Church — insists that the remnant’s failure here is Israel’s national story, not an allegory of the church; the church, a mystery unrevealed in the Old Testament (Ephesians 3:4–6), must not be read back into the passage. The land promise therefore remains in force: the same prophet who pronounced this judgment also guaranteed Israel’s perpetuity as a nation (Jeremiah 31:35–37) and a future regathering “from all the countries” (Jeremiah 32:37–41) — texts dispensationalists such as John Walvoord and J. Dwight Pentecost refer to a literal future restoration culminating in the millennial kingdom (Revelation 20:1–6), when Israel dwells securely in her land under Messiah (Ezekiel 36–37; Amos 9:14–15).

The command “remain in this land” (v. 10) is read as reinforcing the theological centrality of the land in God’s program for Israel: even in judgment, blessing is tied to presence in the land under God’s appointed arrangement, while flight to Egypt forfeits it. The chapter’s “build and plant” language anticipates the eschatological planting of Jeremiah 32:41 — “I will plant them in this land in faithfulness” — which progressive dispensationalists like Craig Blaising see as inaugurated in Christ’s first-advent blessings yet awaiting literal national fulfillment at His return.

Applicationally, dispensational teachers draw from the chapter the same moral lessons as others — the peril of asking God’s will with a made-up mind, the certainty of God’s word — while insisting that its covenantal specifics (land tenure, national curses) belong to Israel. The church, under grace, is warned by Israel’s example (1 Corinthians 10:11) but holds a heavenly calling and destiny distinct from Israel’s earthly kingdom program. Thus Jeremiah 42 functions both as fulfilled-prophecy apologetic and as a sober case study in disobedience, while its land theology awaits consummation in the literal kingdom.

---

Bibliography

• John Calvin, Commentaries on the Book of the Prophet Jeremiah and the Lamentations, Vol. 4 (Calvin Translation Society)
• Matthew Henry, Commentary on the Whole Bible, Vol. 4: Isaiah to Malachi
• Matthew Poole, A Commentary on the Holy Bible, Vol. 2
• Charles H. Spurgeon, The Treasury of the Bible (sermons on Jeremiah)
• R.C. Sproul, The Invisible Hand: Do All Things Really Work for Good? (P&R)
• Sinclair B. Ferguson, The Holy Spirit (IVP, Contours of Christian Theology)
• Geerhardus Vos, Biblical Theology: Old and New Testaments (Eerdmans)
• G.K. Beale, A New Testament Biblical Theology (Baker Academic)
• D.A. Carson, For the Love of God, Vol. 2 (Crossway)
• John Piper, Providence (Crossway)
• J.A. Thompson, The Book of Jeremiah, NICOT (Eerdmans)
• Derek Kidner, The Message of Jeremiah, The Bible Speaks Today (IVP)
• Philip Graham Ryken, Jeremiah and Lamentations: From Sorrow to Hope, Preaching the Word (Crossway)
• C.I. Scofield, The Scofield Reference Bible (Oxford)
• Charles C. Ryrie, Dispensationalism (Moody)
• John F. Walvoord, The Prophecy Knowledge Handbook (Victor)
• J. Dwight Pentecost, Things to Come (Zondervan)
• Craig A. Blaising and Darrell L. Bock, Progressive Dispensationalism (Baker)
• The Westminster Confession of Faith and Catechisms (1647)
• The Holy Bible, English Standard Version (Crossway)