Companion: Summary Handout
On this page
- Opening Prayer
- Closing Prayer
- Timeline Context
- Historical-Grammatical Study
- Expanded Outline
- Section 1 — The Gerasene Demoniac and the Herd of Pigs (Mark 5:1–13)
- Section 2 — The Response of the Region and the Healed Man Sent to Testify (Mark 5:14–20)
- Section 3 — Jairus Pleads for His Daughter (Mark 5:21–24)
- Section 4 — The Woman with the Discharge of Blood (Mark 5:25–34)
- Section 5 — The Raising of Jairus’s Daughter (Mark 5:35–43)
- Cross References
- Comparative Gospel Study
- Old Testament Connections
- New Testament Fulfillment
- Redemptive-Historical Context
- Systematic Theology Connection
- Christ’s Authority over Satan and the Demonic (Christology and Angelology)
- The Deity of Christ
- Saving Faith
- The Holiness of Christ and the Purity of the Unclean
- The Providence of God in Suffering
- The Resurrection and Christ’s Lordship over Death
- Sovereign Grace to the Gentiles and the Outsider
- Union with Christ and the Language of Salvation
- Reformed Theology
- Dispensational Theology
- Bibliography
Passage: Mark 5:1–43. Read the full text in your Bible or a Bible app as you work through this study.
Opening Prayer
Almighty and everlasting God, whose Son commanded the demons and they obeyed, who healed the incurable and raised the dead with a word, we come to You unable to grasp the glory of Christ unless Your Spirit opens our darkened eyes. We confess that we are, apart from grace, like the man among the tombs — bound, self-destructive, and beyond the reach of any human remedy — and like the woman who spent all she had and grew only worse. Send forth Your Holy Spirit to illumine this chapter, that we may behold in Jesus the Holy One of God, mighty over Satan, disease, and death itself. Reveal to us the Christ who is not defiled by our uncleanness but cleanses us by His touch, who is not overcome by death but overcomes it. Convict us of unbelief and of every fear that clings to us in place of faith. Comfort the trembling and the desperate with the assurance that His power is inexhaustible and His mercy sure. Transform us, that having touched Christ by faith, we may go in peace, proclaim how much the Lord has done for us, and rest wholly upon Him who is Lord of life and death. We ask this for the glory of Your name, through Jesus Christ our Lord. Amen.
Closing Prayer
Father of mercies, we thank You for the truth unfolded in this chapter — that Your Son holds absolute authority over the demonic, the diseased, and the dead, and that no bondage, no defilement, and no grave lies beyond His saving power. We confess the sins this Word has exposed: our unbelief when circumstances seem hopeless, our fear where He commands only trust, our clinging to physicians and remedies of our own devising rather than to Christ, and our readiness, like the Gerasenes, to prefer our comfort and our pigs to His disturbing presence. We give You thanks that Christ was not defiled by touching the unclean but cleansed them, that He was not repelled by death but conquered it, and that He receives the trembling and the desperate with tender words: “Daughter, your faith has made you well.” Grant us grace to apply this Word: to bring our impossible cases to Christ, to believe where we cannot see, to go in peace, and to proclaim how much the Lord has done for us. We commit ourselves afresh to trust You in the valley of the shadow, resting on the One who takes death by the hand and says, “Arise.” To the praise of Your glorious grace, through Jesus Christ our Lord. Amen.
Timeline Context
Mark 5 falls within the great Galilean ministry of Jesus (Mark 1:14–8:26), a section dominated by mighty works that unveil His identity and provoke the question, “Who then is this?” (Mark 4:41). The chapter follows immediately upon the stilling of the storm (Mark 4:35–41), forming a deliberate literary and theological sequence: having demonstrated His authority over the raging sea, Jesus now displays His authority over the raging demonic, over disease, and over death. Mark’s Gospel, likely written from Rome in the mid-to-late A.D. 50s or 60s and traditionally associated with Peter’s preaching (cf. 1 Peter 5:13), presents a fast-paced, action-driven portrait of Jesus as the Son of God whose deeds authenticate His word. Mark 5 is one of the Gospel’s clearest showcases of Christ’s comprehensive dominion over the whole domain of the fall.
Geographically, the chapter straddles the Sea of Galilee. The opening episode takes place on the eastern, largely Gentile shore — “the country of the Gerasenes” (v. 1), part of the region of the Decapolis (v. 20), a league of Hellenistic cities. The presence of a “great herd of pigs” (v. 11) confirms the Gentile setting, since swine were unclean and forbidden to Jews (Leviticus 11:7). The tombs, the unclean spirit, and the unclean animals combine to depict a place of profound defilement and death, the very antithesis of covenant holiness. After the deliverance, Jesus recrosses the sea to the western, Jewish shore (v. 21), where He is met by Jairus and the throng.
Politically, this is the reign of the emperor Tiberius (A.D. 14–37), with Herod Antipas as tetrarch of Galilee. The Decapolis lay under Roman provincial administration; the term “Legion” (v. 9), naming a Roman military unit of some six thousand men, would carry ominous overtones for readers under Roman occupation. Redemptive-historically, the chapter stands at the dawn of the messianic kingdom’s inbreaking. The strong Son of God is plundering the house of the strong man (cf. Mark 3:27), reversing the effects of Genesis 3 in advance of the cross and resurrection. The two intertwined miracles of the woman and Jairus’s daughter — both bound to the number twelve (twelve years of bleeding, a girl of twelve, vv. 25, 42) — press home that Jesus is the Lord who gives life where the law could only pronounce uncleanness and death. Mark 5 is, in miniature, a preview of the whole gospel: the Holy One enters a world of demons, disease, and death, and by His authoritative word begins to undo them all.
Historical-Grammatical Study
Genre. Mark 5 is Gospel narrative — historical, theological biography written to proclaim “the gospel of Jesus Christ, the Son of God” (Mark 1:1). Mark’s characteristic style is vivid, compressed, and immediate; the chapter comprises three miracle stories, the second and third intercalated in Mark’s signature “sandwich” technique, wherein the healing of the woman (vv. 25–34) is inserted into the raising of Jairus’s daughter (vv. 21–24, 35–43) so that the two accounts mutually interpret one another.
Key grammatical and syntactical features.
- “Immediately” (euthys, vv. 2, 29, 30, 42). Mark’s favorite adverb drives the narrative at breathless pace; the demoniac meets Jesus immediately, the flow of blood dries up immediately, the girl rises immediately. The urgency underscores the effortless, instantaneous power of Christ’s word and touch.
- “Unclean spirit” (pneuma akatharton, vv. 2, 8, 13). The demonic is characterized as unclean, set against the Holy One of God; the whole scene (tombs, swine, Gentile land) is saturated with ceremonial and spiritual defilement, which Christ’s presence overturns.
- “Legion” (Legiōn, v. 9). A Latin loanword naming a Roman army division of roughly six thousand soldiers; the name confesses both the multitude and the militant, organized hostility of the demonic host, and its helplessness before one greater.
- “Son of the Most High God” (huios tou theou tou hypsistou, v. 7). The demon’s confession employs a title (ho hypsistos, “the Most High”) frequently used by Gentiles for the God of Israel; even the demons know and tremble at Christ’s true identity (cf. James 2:19).
- “He had had mercy on you” (ēleēsen, v. 19). Jesus interprets the exorcism as an act of divine mercy, framing His power in terms of covenant compassion.
- “Discharge of blood” (rhysis haimatos, v. 25). The chronic hemorrhage rendered the woman perpetually unclean under Leviticus 15:25–27, cutting her off from temple, community, and touch. Her healing is described with the verb iaomai (“healed,” v. 29) and the word mastix (“plague, scourge, affliction,” rendered “disease,” vv. 29, 34).
- “Made well” (sōzō, vv. 23, 28, 34). The same verb means both “to heal” and “to save”; “your faith has made you well” (hē pistis sou sesōken se, v. 34) hovers deliberately between physical healing and salvation, uniting the two.
- “Only believe” (monon pisteue, v. 36). A present imperative — “keep on believing”; Jesus summons Jairus to sustained, persevering faith in the face of death.
- “Talitha cumi” (v. 41). An Aramaic phrase preserved by Mark, “Little girl, arise,” carrying the tender ipsissima verba of Jesus; the command that raises the dead is intimate and gentle.
First-century Jewish and Greco-Roman background. Tombs, corpses, hemorrhages, and swine were all sources of ceremonial uncleanness in Jewish law (Numbers 19:11–16; Leviticus 11:7; 15:19–27). The stunning reversal of the chapter is that Jesus, the Holy One, contracts no defilement by contact with the unclean; rather, His holiness proves contagious, expelling the unclean spirit, healing the flow of blood, and raising the dead. In the Greco-Roman world, exorcism and healing were much sought, but Jesus works not by incantation or ritual but by sovereign word.
Covenantal themes. The chapter develops the theme of holiness versus uncleanness, revealing Christ as the true source of cleansing that the ceremonial law could only foreshadow. The mission to the Gerasene demoniac — the first proclaimer of Jesus in Gentile territory (v. 20) — anticipates the covenant’s extension to the nations. And the repeated language of “made well/saved” (sōzō) and “faith” (pistis) roots the miracles in the covenant of grace, where God saves those who trust in Him.
Expanded Outline
Section 1 — The Gerasene Demoniac and the Herd of Pigs (Mark 5:1–13)
Key Insight
Having crossed the sea, Jesus arrives “to the country of the Gerasenes” (v. 1), Gentile territory, and is met “immediately” (euthys) by “a man with an unclean spirit” who “lived among the tombs” (vv. 2–3). Mark paints the man’s condition in devastating strokes: unbindable even with chains, self-lacerating “night and day,” “crying out and cutting himself with stones” (vv. 4–5). Here is a portrait of humanity under the dominion of Satan — dehumanized, isolated among the dead, self-destructive, and beyond every human remedy. No one “had the strength to subdue him” (v. 4); the strong man’s captive is stronger than all who would help him. This is what sin and demonic bondage do: they drive a person from the living into the realm of death and shame.
Yet when he “saw Jesus from afar, he ran and fell down before him” (v. 6). Even the demonized is drawn to Christ. The unclean spirit cries, “What have you to do with me, Jesus, Son of the Most High God? I adjure you by God, do not torment me” (v. 7). The demons possess an orthodox theology — they confess Jesus as “Son of the Most High God” — but it is a theology of terror, not faith (cf. James 2:19, “the demons believe — and shudder”). Calvin observes that “the devils, against their will, are compelled to acknowledge the power of Christ, though they resist it with all their might.” Jesus had commanded, “Come out of the man, you unclean spirit!” (v. 8), and now He asks, “What is your name?” The reply is chilling: “My name is Legion, for we are many” (v. 9). A Roman legion numbered some six thousand; the man was possessed by a militant multitude, an army of hell arrayed against one soul.
The demons “begged him earnestly not to send them out of the country” and, seeing the great herd of pigs, pleaded, “Send us to the pigs; let us enter them” (vv. 10–12). The demons can do nothing without permission; they are utterly subject to Christ’s authority, begging where they once bound (Mark 3:27). “So he gave them permission,” and the unclean spirits entered the pigs, and the herd “rushed down the steep bank into the sea and drowned” (v. 13). France notes that the destruction of the swine dramatizes “the destructive intent of the demonic” — what they did to the man they now do to the pigs, exposing their murderous nature. The drowning in the sea, itself a biblical image of chaos and judgment (cf. Exodus 15), publicly demonstrates the reality and the ruin of the deliverance. Sproul comments that “the demons’ request to enter the swine reveals their nature: they exist to destroy.” Christologically, Mark shows the stronger man binding the strong man and plundering his house (Mark 3:27); the Son of God has invaded enemy territory and, with a word, liberated a captive no chain could hold.
Application
This scene both humbles and comforts. First, it exposes the reality of the demonic and the horror of bondage to sin. No human strength, no chain of resolve or self-help, can subdue the power that holds a soul; only Christ can liberate. When you meet the seemingly hopeless case — the addict, the tormented, the self-destructive — remember that the one who broke the demoniac’s chains breaks every bondage. Do not despair of anyone Christ has set His hand to save. Second, take warning from the demons’ orthodoxy: it is possible to know the truth about Jesus, even to confess Him as the Son of God, and yet to have no saving faith. Right doctrine that does not bow to Christ in trust and love is the theology of demons, not of disciples. Examine whether your knowledge of Christ has bowed your heart to Him. Third, be assured of Christ’s absolute sovereignty over the powers of darkness. The demons could not touch a pig without His leave; how much less can Satan touch you apart from the sovereign will of your Savior (cf. Job 1:12). Beware two misapplications: a morbid fascination with the demonic that eclipses Christ, and a skeptical denial of the spiritual realm that leaves the soul unarmed. Fix your eyes on the stronger Man who has already begun to plunder the house of the enemy.
Application Question 1: Do I truly believe that no case is too hopeless for Christ to save, or do I write off certain people as beyond His reach?
Answer: The Gerasene demoniac was the most hopeless of cases — unbindable, self-destructive, dwelling among the dead, possessed by a legion — and Jesus liberated him with a word (vv. 1–13). Self-examination asks whether I secretly regard some people, or some of my own sins, as beyond the reach of grace. The Christ who broke chains no man could break is able to save to the uttermost the most enslaved soul. Practically, I should keep praying for and reaching out to those the world has given up on, refusing to let apparent hopelessness dictate my hope, because deliverance depends on Christ’s power, not on the depth of the bondage.
Why is this question important? Because despair over “impossible” people quietly denies the power of Christ. Believing that no bondage is too strong for the Son of God fuels persevering prayer and bold witness and keeps my confidence in His omnipotence rather than in human potential. The very hopelessness of the demoniac magnifies the grace that saved him, and the same grace is sufficient for any I am tempted to abandon.
Application Question 2: Is my knowledge of Christ mere information that leaves me unchanged, or has it bowed my heart to Him in saving trust?
Answer: The demons confessed Jesus as “Son of the Most High God” (v. 7), yet their knowledge produced only terror and resistance, not faith. Self-examination asks whether my grasp of Christian truth has translated into genuine submission and love, or whether I merely hold correct doctrine at arm’s length. A theology that names Christ rightly but does not surrender to Him in trust is the belief of demons, not of the saved. Practically, I should ask whether my knowledge of Christ has produced repentance, worship, and obedience, or whether I am content to affirm truths that leave my heart untouched and my life unaltered.
Why is this question important? Because it is possible to be theologically correct and spiritually lost. Recognizing that saving faith is more than intellectual assent guards me from a demonic orthodoxy and drives me to embrace Christ with heart and will, not merely with the mind. This distinction is the difference between trembling before Christ and resting in Him.
Deep Study Question 1: What does this passage teach about the nature and limits of demonic power, and how does it display the sovereignty of Christ?
Answer: The demons are real, numerous (“Legion”), organized, and destructive, able to render a man beyond all human control (vv. 3–5, 9), yet they are wholly subject to Christ: they beg rather than command, and they can enter even a pig only by His permission (vv. 10–13). Demonic power is genuine but strictly bounded; Satan and his hosts operate only within the limits the sovereign Christ permits. Reformed theology affirms the reality of Satan and demons as fallen creatures who, though powerful, remain under God’s absolute control (cf. Job 1:12; Luke 22:31). The Westminster Confession (5.1) teaches that God “doth uphold, direct, dispose, and govern all creatures, actions, and things… even to the least,” and (5.4) that His providence extends to “the first fall, and all other sins of angels and men.” The stronger Man has come to bind the strong man (Mark 3:27). Christ’s authority over the demonic is absolute, effortless, and exercised by His mere word.
Why is this question important? Because misunderstanding demonic power breeds either paralyzing fear or naive denial. Grasping that demons are real yet wholly subject to Christ frees the believer from terror while keeping him watchful. It anchors the Christian’s confidence in the sovereign Lord who permits nothing outside His will and who has already begun to overthrow the kingdom of darkness. This truth is the foundation of the believer’s security in spiritual conflict.
Deep Study Question 2: Why does Mark set this deliverance amid tombs, unclean spirits, and unclean swine, and what is the theological significance of the Gentile setting?
Answer: Mark heaps up images of defilement — tombs (corpses), an unclean spirit, and a herd of unclean pigs in Gentile territory (vv. 1–13) — to portray a place utterly given over to death and uncleanness, the very opposite of covenant holiness. Into this concentrated realm of defilement the Holy One of God enters and, far from being defiled, expels the unclean and restores the captive, foreshadowing the gospel’s cleansing power reaching even the Gentiles. Under the law, contact with corpses and discharges brought uncleanness (Numbers 19:11–16; Leviticus 11:7), but Christ reverses the flow: holiness overcomes uncleanness. The Gentile setting and the healed man’s proclamation “in the Decapolis” (v. 20) anticipate the mission to the nations (cf. Isaiah 49:6; Acts 1:8). France observes that this is the first Gentile to bear witness to Jesus. The scene previews the cleansing, saving reach of Christ to the unclean and the outsider.
Why is this question important? Because it reveals the trajectory of the gospel and the nature of Christ’s holiness. Seeing that Christ cleanses rather than being defiled, and that His mercy reaches Gentiles, assures me that no defilement in my life places me beyond His purifying grace. It also grounds the church’s mission to the nations in Christ’s own ministry, showing that the holiness of God in Christ is redemptive, not merely separating.
Section 2 — The Response of the Region and the Healed Man Sent to Testify (Mark 5:14–20)
Key Insight
News of the deliverance spreads as the terrified herdsmen flee and tell it “in the city and in the country” (v. 14). The people come and find “the demon-possessed man… sitting there, clothed and in his right mind” (v. 15). The transformation is total: the wild, naked, screaming captive now sits, clothed, sane, at rest — a living picture of what Christ does for the soul He saves. Yet the response is not joy but fear: “they were afraid” (v. 15). When the eyewitnesses recount “what had happened to the demon-possessed man and to the pigs” (v. 16), the townspeople “began to beg Jesus to depart from their region” (v. 17). Matthew Henry laments that “they had rather lose Christ’s presence than their swine”; the loss of their livestock weighed more with them than the salvation of a man. The Gerasenes preferred their pigs and their peace to the presence of the Savior — a sobering revelation of the human heart that resists Christ when He disturbs our comfort or our commerce. Sproul notes that “they were more concerned about their economic loss than about the greatest miracle they had ever seen.” Their fear was not the reverent fear that leads to worship but the self-protective fear that drives Christ away.
Against this backdrop of rejection stands the delivered man’s devotion. “As he was getting into the boat, the man who had been possessed… begged him that he might be with him” (v. 18). It is a beautiful request — to be “with him” (cf. Mark 3:14, where the Twelve are appointed “to be with him”). Yet Jesus, in wisdom, “did not permit him” but gave him a commission: “Go home to your friends and tell them how much the Lord has done for you, and how he has had mercy on you” (v. 19). Christ appoints His restored captive to be the first missionary to the Decapolis, a Gentile evangelist to his own people. The man’s obedience is immediate: “he went away and began to proclaim in the Decapolis how much Jesus had done for him, and everyone marveled” (v. 20). Notably, Jesus said “how much the Lord has done,” and the man proclaimed “how much Jesus had done” — an implicit testimony to Christ’s deity, for the man rightly identifies Jesus with the Lord. France observes that “the man’s obedience contrasts sharply with the region’s rejection.” Where the region drove Jesus away, the healed man carried His name abroad. Christologically, the saved sinner becomes a herald of sovereign mercy, his very transformation the sermon, his testimony the seed sown in Gentile soil ahead of the church’s later mission.
Application
This passage searches our hearts and directs our witness. First, ask what you love more than Christ. The Gerasenes drove away the Savior to keep their swine; we too can prefer our comforts, possessions, and undisturbed routines to the disrupting presence of Christ. When following Jesus threatens your livelihood, your reputation, or your ease, will you cling to Christ or beg Him to depart? Second, marvel at the transformation grace works. The one Christ saves is clothed, seated, and in his right mind; if He has changed you, let your restored life bear witness. Third, learn the pattern of Christian mission from the healed man: “tell them how much the Lord has done for you, and how he has had mercy on you.” Your testimony need not be sophisticated; simply proclaim what Christ has done and the mercy He has shown you. Not every disciple is called to leave home; some, like this man, are sent back to their own households and communities to witness there. Beware two misapplications: the sentimental desire to escape ordinary life for a “spiritual” existence “with Jesus” when He calls you to witness where you are, and the pragmatic idolatry that measures Christ’s worth by what following Him costs us. Count His presence more precious than any herd of swine.
Application Question 1: What in my life am I tempted to value more than the presence of Christ, even to the point of pushing Him away when He disturbs it?
Answer: The Gerasenes “began to beg Jesus to depart from their region” (v. 17) because His work cost them a herd of pigs; they prized their property over the Savior. Self-examination asks what comforts, possessions, relationships, or routines I would rather keep than have Christ disrupt. Anything I cling to more tightly than Christ, and would rather retain than surrender to His disturbing presence, has become an idol. Practically, I should identify where obedience to Christ threatens my finances, comfort, or reputation, and ask whether I welcome or resist His intrusion, choosing His presence over every rival treasure.
Why is this question important? Because the human heart will drive away the Savior to protect its idols. Recognizing what I love more than Christ exposes the idolatry that resists His lordship and calls me to count His presence more precious than any possession. The Gerasenes’ tragedy warns that mere proximity to Christ’s power, without valuing Him above all, ends in sending Him away.
Application Question 2: Am I willing to bear witness to what Christ has done for me, right where He has placed me?
Answer: Jesus sent the healed man home to “tell them how much the Lord has done for you, and how he has had mercy on you” (v. 19), and the man obediently proclaimed it throughout the Decapolis (v. 20). Self-examination asks whether I am telling those around me — family, friends, neighbors — what Christ has done and the mercy He has shown me. My own testimony of Christ’s mercy is a witness I am called to bear in the ordinary places of my life. Practically, I should be ready to speak simply and gladly of what the Lord has done for me, not waiting for extraordinary opportunities but faithfully proclaiming His mercy where He has planted me.
Why is this question important? Because every saved sinner is a trophy of grace and a called witness. Understanding that my transformation itself is a testimony frees me to share the gospel simply and boldly without needing eloquence or credentials. The healed man’s obedience shows that the first fruit of deliverance is proclamation, and that home is often the first mission field.
Deep Study Question 1: Why did Jesus refuse the man’s request to remain “with him” and instead send him to testify, and what does this teach about discipleship and mission?
Answer: The delivered man “begged him that he might be with him,” but Jesus “did not permit him” and instead commissioned him to “go home… and tell them how much the Lord has done for you” (vv. 18–19). Christ sovereignly assigns each disciple his calling; for this man, the path of obedience was not withdrawal to be with Jesus but witness among his own people in Gentile territory. To “be with him” echoes the Twelve’s appointment (Mark 3:14), yet Jesus discerns that this man’s mission is to sow the gospel in the Decapolis ahead of the church’s later Gentile mission. Reformed theology affirms that God calls believers to varied stations and vocations (1 Corinthians 7:17), and that witness in ordinary life is genuine discipleship. The man’s proclamation that “Jesus” had done what Jesus called “the Lord” doing (vv. 19–20) implicitly confesses Christ’s deity. Discipleship is obedience to Christ’s particular calling, which for most means faithful witness where God has placed them.
Why is this question important? Because we may romanticize a “spiritual” life apart from ordinary duty. Recognizing that Christ often sends His people back to their own communities to witness dignifies everyday obedience and corrects the notion that true devotion requires escape from normal life. It also shows Christ’s sovereign wisdom in assigning callings and His purpose to spread the gospel through transformed lives.
Deep Study Question 2: What is the significance of the man proclaiming what “Jesus” had done when Jesus told him to proclaim what “the Lord” had done (vv. 19–20)?
Answer: Jesus commanded the man to tell “how much the Lord has done for you, and how he has had mercy on you” (v. 19), and the man “began to proclaim… how much Jesus had done for him” (v. 20). By identifying “Jesus” with “the Lord,” the man’s testimony bears implicit witness to Christ’s deity, and the very act of exorcism is interpreted as the work of the Lord God showing mercy. In the Old Testament, “the Lord” (kyrios, translating YHWH) is the covenant God who saves; the man rightly perceives that in Jesus, the Lord Himself has acted. Reformed theology confesses the full deity of Christ (Westminster Shorter Catechism Q. 21: the Redeemer is “the Lord Jesus Christ, who, being the eternal Son of God, became man”). The interchange of “Lord” and “Jesus” is one of many subtle indications in Mark that Jesus is more than a mere man. The delivered man’s proclamation confesses that in Jesus, the Lord Himself has shown saving mercy.
Why is this question important? Because the deity of Christ is the foundation of His saving power. Recognizing that the man’s testimony equates Jesus with the Lord assures me that the One who delivers is God Himself, whose mercy and power are infinite. It guards against reducing Jesus to a mere exorcist or teacher and grounds the confidence that His salvation is the very work of God.
Section 3 — Jairus Pleads for His Daughter (Mark 5:21–24)
Key Insight
Jesus recrosses the sea to the Jewish shore, where “a great crowd gathered about him” (v. 21). Into this throng comes a man of standing: “one of the rulers of the synagogue, Jairus by name” (v. 22). As an archisynagōgos, Jairus was a respected leader responsible for the synagogue’s worship and order — a man whose position might have inclined him, like many of the religious authorities, to suspicion of Jesus. Yet desperation overrides dignity: “seeing him, he fell at his feet and implored him earnestly” (v. 22). The proud distinctions of rank collapse before the need of a dying child; the synagogue ruler prostrates himself before the Galilean teacher. His plea is urgent and tender: “My little daughter is at the point of death. Come and lay your hands on her, so that she may be made well and live” (v. 23). The diminutive “little daughter” (thygatrion) breathes a father’s love, and “at the point of death” (eschatōs echei) signals the extremity of the crisis.
Jairus’s request reveals a faith that, though imperfect, is real. He believes that Jesus’ touch — “lay your hands on her” — can heal and give life. Calvin notes that Jairus’s faith “was weak and mixed with error, for he thought that Christ could not heal his daughter unless he were present”; yet Christ does not despise weak faith but honors it. Genuine faith often comes tangled with fear and misunderstanding, and Christ receives it still. The verb “made well” (sōthē) again carries the double sense of healing and salvation, while “live” (zēsē) sets the stage for the theme that will dominate the episode: life over death. “And he went with him” (v. 24), Jesus consenting at once to accompany the desperate father. Immediately Mark notes that “a great crowd followed him and thronged about him” (v. 24), the pressing multitude setting the scene for the interruption to come.
Christologically, this brief scene displays Jesus as the compassionate Lord who responds to the cry of the desperate, regardless of status, and who is willing to go where death threatens. The synagogue ruler at Jesus’ feet is a portrait of the humility that saving faith requires: whatever our position, we must come to Christ as helpless suppliants. France observes that “Jairus’s public act of homage was a bold and costly step for a man in his position.” Jairus stakes his reputation and his hope on Jesus alone, and in so doing models the posture every sinner must take before the Lord of life.
Application
This passage teaches us how to come to Christ in our extremity. First, learn from Jairus that no position, reputation, or self-sufficiency should keep us from falling at Jesus’ feet. When crisis strips away our pretensions, we discover that we are all desperate suppliants before the Lord of life. Do not let pride, respectability, or fear of what others think prevent you from casting yourself wholly on Christ. Second, bring your impossible burdens to Jesus. Jairus’s daughter was “at the point of death,” yet he came; there is no situation too dire to bring to the Savior. The desperation that drives us to Christ is not weakness but the beginning of faith. Third, take comfort that Christ receives even imperfect faith. Jairus’s faith was mixed with the assumption that Jesus must be physically present and act before death struck; yet Jesus went with him and would exceed his hopes. Do not wait for perfect faith before coming; come with the faith you have, and Christ will strengthen it. Beware two misapplications: a false humility that thinks oneself too unworthy to approach Christ (the whole point is that the desperate may come), and a presumptuous faith that dictates to Christ the terms and timing of His help. Come humbly, urgently, and trustingly, laying your dearest concerns at His feet.
Application Question 1: Do I let my position, pride, or reputation keep me from humbling myself before Christ in my need?
Answer: Jairus, a ruler of the synagogue, “fell at his feet and implored him earnestly” (v. 22), setting aside rank and reputation in his desperation. Self-examination asks whether my status, self-image, or fear of others’ opinions hinders me from coming to Christ as a helpless suppliant. Whatever my standing, I must come to Christ as one utterly dependent, falling at His feet. Practically, when need presses, I should refuse to let pride or respectability keep me from prayer and humble dependence, following Jairus in casting myself wholly upon the Lord of life regardless of how it appears to others.
Why is this question important? Because pride is a great barrier to grace, and God gives grace to the humble. Recognizing that saving faith requires falling at Christ’s feet dismantles the self-sufficiency that keeps me from Him and teaches me that my truest dignity is found in humble dependence on Christ, not in my position or reputation.
Application Question 2: Do I bring my most desperate and impossible situations to Christ, or do I assume they are beyond hope?
Answer: Jairus brought a daughter “at the point of death” to Jesus, believing His touch could make her “well and live” (v. 23). Self-examination asks whether I carry my direst burdens to Christ in earnest prayer, or whether I give up on situations that seem hopeless. No crisis is too extreme to lay before the Lord of life; desperation is a doorway to faith, not a reason to abandon it. Practically, when I face illness, death, or seemingly impossible circumstances, I should follow Jairus in coming urgently to Christ, entrusting even matters of life and death to His compassionate power.
Why is this question important? Because unbelief whispers that some troubles are beyond God’s help. Learning to bring impossible situations to Christ keeps my hope anchored in His power rather than in my circumstances and opens the door for Him to do more than I ask or imagine. Jairus’s urgent faith models the confidence that drives the desperate to the only One who can save.
Deep Study Question 1: What does Jairus’s faith, imperfect as it was, teach about the nature of saving faith and Christ’s response to it?
Answer: Jairus believed Jesus could heal by laying hands on his daughter, yet his faith assumed Christ’s physical presence was necessary and did not yet reckon with power over death (v. 23); Calvin calls it faith “weak and mixed with error.” Saving faith is often imperfect, mingled with fear and misunderstanding, yet Christ does not despise it but receives, honors, and strengthens it. Faith’s validity rests not on its strength or purity but on its true object — Christ Himself (cf. Mark 9:24, “I believe; help my unbelief!”). Reformed theology teaches that even weak faith truly unites the believer to Christ; the Westminster Confession (14.3) affirms that faith may be “weak or strong,” “often and many ways assailed and weakened, but getting the victory.” Jesus goes with Jairus and will surpass his expectations. Christ welcomes weak faith and leads it to fuller trust.
Why is this question important? Because many are discouraged by the smallness of their faith. Recognizing that Christ receives and strengthens imperfect faith frees the trembling believer to come as he is rather than waiting for a faith he does not yet possess. It locates the power of faith in its object, Christ, not in its own intensity, and assures us that the Lord who accepted Jairus will accept us.
Deep Study Question 2: How does the account of Jairus, a synagogue ruler, contribute to Mark’s presentation of who comes to Jesus and how the kingdom breaks in?
Answer: Jairus is an archisynagōgos, a respected religious leader, publicly prostrating himself before Jesus (v. 22) — a striking contrast to the growing hostility of the religious authorities elsewhere in Mark (cf. Mark 3:6). Mark shows that the kingdom of God draws all kinds — Gentile demoniac and Jewish ruler, outcast woman and honored official — leveling every distinction before the sovereign compassion of Christ. Both Jairus and the woman who follows are bound by the number twelve (vv. 25, 42), and both must come as helpless suppliants. Reformed theology sees in the diverse company gathered to Christ the sovereign, gracious calling that “is not of him who wills, nor of him who runs, but of God who has mercy” (Romans 9:16). The synagogue ruler’s homage foreshadows that some of the religious establishment would believe (cf. Acts 6:7). The kingdom breaks in wherever desperate faith bows before the Lord of life, regardless of status.
Why is this question important? Because it reveals the breadth and freeness of Christ’s grace. Seeing that both the outcast and the honored must come to Christ the same way humbles every distinction and exalts sovereign mercy. It assures the respectable and the ruined alike that there is one way to the Lord of life — humble, desperate faith — and that Christ turns none away who come.
Section 4 — The Woman with the Discharge of Blood (Mark 5:25–34)
Key Insight
As Jesus goes toward Jairus’s house, Mark inserts a second story within the first. “There was a woman who had had a discharge of blood for twelve years” (v. 25), “and who had suffered much under many physicians, and had spent all that she had, and was no better but rather grew worse” (v. 26). Her condition was medically hopeless and, worse, ceremonially defiling: under Leviticus 15:25–27, a chronic hemorrhage rendered her perpetually unclean, cutting her off from the temple, from normal society, and from human touch. For twelve years she had been an outcast — impoverished, isolated, and unclean — a woman whose very touch would defile. Where the demoniac was possessed and Jairus’s daughter dying, this woman was slowly, chronically wasting, her plight the picture of a hopeless, defiling misery that no human remedy could reach.
“She had heard the reports about Jesus and came up behind him in the crowd and touched his garment. For she said, ‘If I touch even his garments, I will be made well’” (vv. 27–28). Her theology was imperfect — perhaps touched with superstition, thinking the healing lay in the garment itself — yet her faith was real, reaching out to Christ as her only hope. Weak and mingled faith, if it truly lays hold of Christ, receives His power. “And immediately the flow of blood dried up, and she felt in her body that she was healed of her disease” (v. 29). The word “disease” (mastix) means literally a “scourge” or “plague,” conveying the affliction’s cruelty. The stunning reversal is that her unclean touch did not defile Christ; rather, His holiness cleansed her. Ferguson observes that “Jesus is the one person whose contact with uncleanness results not in His defilement but in the cleansing of the unclean.”
Jesus, “perceiving in himself that power had gone out from him,” turned and asked, “Who touched my garments?” (v. 30). The disciples object at the seeming absurdity of the question amid the crushing crowd (v. 31), but Jesus knows a touch of faith is different from the jostling of the multitude. The woman, “knowing what had happened to her, came in fear and trembling and fell down before him and told him the whole truth” (v. 33). Jesus did not want her to steal away with an anonymous cure; He would give her more than healing — assurance, dignity, and relationship. His words are among the tenderest in the Gospels: “Daughter, your faith has made you well; go in peace, and be healed of your disease” (v. 34). He calls her “Daughter” — the only person so addressed by Jesus in the Gospels — restoring the outcast to family, and He credits her faith, sends her in peace, and confirms her wholeness. The verb “made well” (sesōken, from sōzō) means both “healed” and “saved”; her healing is a sign of her salvation. Calvin comments that Christ “commends her faith, that we may learn that it is faith alone which obtains everything from Christ.” Christologically, the untouchable is touched, the unclean is cleansed, and the outcast is called Daughter — the gospel in a single encounter.
Application
This encounter is a treasury of comfort for the desperate and defiled. First, bring your incurable troubles to Christ. The woman had exhausted every physician and every resource, growing only worse; when every human remedy fails, Christ remains, and He is able to heal what no one else can touch. Do not despair after long years of unanswered struggle; the woman suffered twelve years before she met her Healer. Second, understand that faith need not be strong or theologically flawless to lay hold of Christ; it need only truly touch Him. A trembling, imperfect faith that reaches out to Jesus receives His power; the strength is in Him, not in the faith. Third, do not remain anonymous with Christ. Jesus drew the woman out because He wanted not merely to heal her body but to give her assurance, peace, and a place in His family. Come out of hiding and confess Christ openly; He would have you know Him as “Daughter,” not merely as a source of benefits. Beware two misapplications: a superstitious faith that trusts in objects, rituals, or formulas rather than in Christ Himself (the garment did not heal; Christ did), and a timid faith that is content with secret benefit and never comes to open confession and fellowship. Reach out and touch Christ, then hear Him call you His own.
Application Question 1: Do I keep bringing my long, unresolved struggles to Christ, or have I given up after years of disappointment?
Answer: The woman had suffered twelve years, exhausted every physician, spent all she had, and grown worse (vv. 25–26), yet she came to Christ and was healed (v. 29). Self-examination asks whether prolonged, unanswered suffering has led me to abandon hope in Christ. When every earthly remedy has failed and years have passed, Christ remains able and willing to heal and save. Practically, I should keep bringing my chronic burdens — physical, emotional, spiritual — to Christ in persevering faith, refusing to conclude that long delay means His inability or unwillingness to help.
Why is this question important? Because long affliction tempts us to despair of Christ’s help. Recognizing that Christ can reach what no physician can keeps my hope alive through years of struggle and directs me to the only One whose power never fails. The woman’s twelve-year trial magnifies the grace that finally healed her and encourages every long-suffering believer to keep reaching for Christ.
Application Question 2: Am I content with secret, anonymous benefit from Christ, or do I come out to confess Him openly and know Him personally?
Answer: The woman was healed secretly, but Jesus drew her out so she “told him the whole truth,” and He called her “Daughter” and sent her in peace (vv. 33–34). Self-examination asks whether I am satisfied to receive Christ’s blessings privately without open confession and personal relationship. Christ desires not merely to bless me from a distance but to draw me into open confession, assurance, and the intimacy of calling me His own. Practically, I should not hide my faith or my need but confess Christ openly, seeking not just His gifts but Himself, and receiving the assurance and belonging He offers to those who come to Him face to face.
Why is this question important? Because a hidden, benefit-seeking faith misses the relationship Christ offers. Understanding that Christ calls the healed to open confession and fellowship draws me out of anonymous religion into personal communion with Him. His tender word “Daughter” shows that He gives Himself, not merely His gifts, to those who come and confess Him.
Deep Study Question 1: What is the significance of the woman’s uncleanness under the Levitical law, and how does her healing reveal the nature of Christ’s holiness?
Answer: Under Leviticus 15:25–27, a woman with a chronic discharge of blood was perpetually unclean, and whatever and whoever she touched became unclean; she was cut off from temple and community (v. 25). By touching Jesus, she should have rendered Him unclean, but instead His holiness flowed to her, cleansing and healing rather than being defiled — a reversal that reveals the redemptive, cleansing power of Christ’s holiness. Where the ceremonial law could only quarantine uncleanness, Christ overcomes it, foreshadowing the cleansing He accomplishes at the cross (cf. Hebrews 9:13–14). Reformed theology sees the ceremonial laws of purity as types pointing to Christ, who is the true source of cleansing (Westminster Confession 19.3, the ceremonial laws “prefiguring Christ”). Ferguson notes that Christ’s contact with uncleanness results in cleansing, not defilement. Christ’s holiness is not fragile but conquering, purifying the unclean who come to Him.
Why is this question important? Because it displays how Christ deals with our defilement. Seeing that Christ’s holiness cleanses rather than recoils assures me that no uncleanness in my life places me beyond His purifying grace. It transforms the fearful holiness of the law into the welcoming, redemptive holiness of the Savior, who touches the untouchable and makes the unclean whole.
Deep Study Question 2: What does “your faith has made you well” (v. 34) teach about the instrument of salvation and the meaning of sōzō?
Answer: Jesus says, “Daughter, your faith has made you well” (hē pistis sou sesōken se, v. 34), using sōzō, which means both “to heal” and “to save.” Faith is the instrument that lays hold of Christ’s power, and the woman’s physical healing is a sign of the salvation faith brings; the double meaning of sōzō unites bodily healing and spiritual salvation. It is not that faith itself heals as a power, but that faith connects the woman to Christ, in whom the power resides; the strength is in the object, not the act. Reformed theology teaches that faith is the instrumental cause of justification, “the alone instrument” by which we receive Christ (Westminster Confession 11.2), never meritorious in itself but “the hand” that receives Christ and His benefits. Calvin: “it is faith alone which obtains everything from Christ.” Faith saves not by its own power but by uniting the sinner to the mighty Savior.
Why is this question important? Because misunderstanding faith turns it into a work or a power. Recognizing that faith is the empty hand that receives Christ guards against making my faith the ground of my salvation and directs all confidence to Christ, its object. It also unites healing and salvation, showing that the Savior of the body is the Savior of the soul, and that saving faith is trust in Him.
Section 5 — The Raising of Jairus’s Daughter (Mark 5:35–43)
Key Insight
The delay caused by the woman becomes the occasion for a greater display of glory. “While he was still speaking, there came from the ruler’s house some who said, ‘Your daughter is dead. Why trouble the Teacher any further?’” (v. 35). The worst has happened; to the messengers, death is the end, and Jesus is now merely “the Teacher,” too late to help. But death is no obstacle to the Lord of life. “Overhearing what they said, Jesus said to the ruler of the synagogue, ‘Do not fear, only believe’” (v. 36). At the very point where human hope collapses, Christ calls for faith to press on: not fear, but faith, even in the face of death. The present imperative “only believe” (monon pisteue) summons Jairus to sustained, persevering trust precisely when believing seems most impossible.
Jesus permits only Peter, James, and John to accompany Him (v. 37) — the inner circle who will also witness the Transfiguration and Gethsemane — and arrives to find “a commotion, people weeping and wailing loudly” (v. 38), the professional mourners already at their work. His words astonish: “Why are you making a commotion and weeping? The child is not dead but sleeping” (v. 39). To Christ, the death of His own is but a sleep from which He will surely wake them (cf. John 11:11; 1 Thessalonians 4:14). This is not a denial that she had truly died — the mourners knew death when they saw it — but a declaration that, in His presence, her death is as temporary and reversible as sleep. “And they laughed at him” (v. 40); the scorn of unbelief meets the word of the Lord of life. Henry observes that “they who will not believe the promises of Christ will not fail to ridicule them.”
Jesus “put them all outside” and, taking the parents and the three disciples, “went in where the child was” (v. 40). “Taking her by the hand he said to her, ‘Talitha cumi,’ which means, ‘Little girl, I say to you, arise’” (v. 41). Mark preserves the tender Aramaic words of Jesus. He touches the corpse — again contracting no defilement, but imparting life — and with a gentle, authoritative word raises the dead as easily as a mother wakes a sleeping child. “And immediately the girl got up and began walking (for she was twelve years of age), and they were immediately overcome with amazement” (v. 42). The proof of life is complete and public: she rises, she walks. Then, characteristically, “he strictly charged them that no one should know this, and told them to give her something to eat” (v. 43) — the “messianic secret” of Mark, restraining premature and distorted acclaim, joined to a tender, practical care for the child’s ordinary need. France notes that “the command to feed her underlines the reality and completeness of the restoration.” Christologically, this is the climactic sign: Jesus is Lord over death itself, the resurrection and the life (John 11:25), whose word will one day call all the dead from their graves (John 5:28–29). The raising of a twelve-year-old girl is a firstfruits and a promise of the resurrection He will secure by His own dying and rising.
Application
This climactic miracle speaks directly to our deepest fears. First, hear Christ’s word to the grieving and the terrified: “Do not fear, only believe.” When death or disaster strikes and human hope collapses, Christ summons us to persevering faith in the Lord of life. Faith is not the denial of the reality of death but trust in the One who is greater than death. Second, take comfort that for the believer, death is but sleep. Christ so masters death that the departure of His own is, from His side, a slumber from which He will wake them at the last day. Grieve, but “not as others do who have no hope” (1 Thessalonians 4:13). Third, marvel that the Lord who raises the dead also remembers to feed a hungry child. The Christ of cosmic power is tender in the smallest details of our lives; He cares for both your eternal destiny and your daily bread. Fourth, let this miracle fortify your hope of resurrection. If Jesus could take a dead girl by the hand and say “Arise,” He can and will raise you. Beware two misapplications: presuming that faith guarantees the removal of every earthly loss (Jairus’s daughter died before she was raised, and not every believer is spared bereavement in this life), and despairing as though death were the final word for those in Christ. Believe, do not fear, in the Lord of life.
Application Question 1: When death, loss, or disaster strikes, do I yield to fear, or do I heed Christ’s call to “not fear, only believe”?
Answer: When the news came that Jairus’s daughter was dead, Jesus said, “Do not fear, only believe” (v. 36), calling for faith at the very point of hopelessness. Self-examination asks whether I let fear master me when confronted with death, grief, or catastrophe, or whether I trust the Lord of life. Christ commands persevering faith precisely where circumstances seem most hopeless, for He is greater than death itself. Practically, when I face loss or the threat of death, I should refuse to let fear rule, and instead cling to Christ in sustained trust, believing that no situation lies beyond His life-giving power.
Why is this question important? Because fear in the face of death reveals where my true trust lies. Heeding Christ’s “do not fear, only believe” anchors my heart in the Lord of life when everything else fails and transforms the darkest moments into occasions for faith. Jairus was called to believe when believing seemed absurd, and the same call sustains every believer in the valley of the shadow.
Application Question 2: Do I grieve death as those without hope, or do I rest in Christ’s power to raise the dead?
Answer: Jesus declared the dead girl “not dead but sleeping” (v. 39) and raised her with a word (v. 41), showing that for those in His hands, death is but a sleep. Self-examination asks whether my grief over death is swallowed by despair, or tempered by the sure hope of resurrection in Christ. For the believer, death is a sleep from which Christ will surely wake His own; grief is real but not hopeless. Practically, when I mourn, I should grieve honestly yet cling to the resurrection hope, remembering that the Christ who raised Jairus’s daughter has conquered death and will raise all who are His.
Why is this question important? Because the fear and finality of death crush those without hope. Resting in Christ’s power over death transforms grief into hope and robs death of its terror for the believer. The raising of Jairus’s daughter is a pledge of the resurrection Christ secured, assuring me that death is not the end for those who belong to Him.
Deep Study Question 1: What does Jesus mean by saying the child is “not dead but sleeping” (v. 39), and how does this shape the Christian understanding of death?
Answer: Jesus says the girl is “not dead but sleeping” (v. 39), though she had truly died and the mourners knew it (they “laughed at him,” v. 40). He does not deny the reality of her death but redefines it in light of His power: in His presence, death is as temporary and reversible as sleep, from which He will wake His own. The metaphor of sleep for the death of believers recurs throughout the New Testament (John 11:11; Acts 7:60; 1 Corinthians 15:6; 1 Thessalonians 4:13–14), grounded in the certainty of resurrection. Reformed theology affirms the intermediate state and the bodily resurrection: the Westminster Confession (32.1) teaches that the bodies of the dead “rest in their graves… as in their beds” until the resurrection. Death is real, the last enemy (1 Corinthians 15:26), yet for those in Christ it is a defeated enemy, a sleep before waking. Christ’s mastery over death makes it, for His people, a slumber and not an end.
Why is this question important? Because the meaning of death shapes how we live and grieve. Understanding death as “sleep” for the believer fills me with resurrection hope and drains death of its finality without minimizing its reality as an enemy Christ has conquered. It teaches me to face my own death and the death of loved ones in Christ with sober hope, trusting the One who will call the sleeping to arise.
Deep Study Question 2: How does the raising of Jairus’s daughter reveal Christ’s deity and anticipate the resurrection, and what is the significance of Him touching the dead?
Answer: Jesus takes the dead girl by the hand and, with an authoritative word, “Talitha cumi… arise” (v. 41), instantly restores her to life (v. 42). Only God is Lord over life and death (Deuteronomy 32:39; 1 Samuel 2:6); by raising the dead with His own word and touch, Jesus exercises a divine prerogative, revealing His deity and anticipating His own resurrection and the general resurrection to come. Where the prophets Elijah and Elisha raised the dead by prayer and God’s power working through them (1 Kings 17:21–22; 2 Kings 4:33–35), Jesus raises by His own authority and word. His touch of the corpse imparts life rather than contracting defilement, as with the woman. Reformed theology confesses Christ as the resurrection and the life (John 11:25), whose voice will raise all the dead (John 5:28–29; Westminster Confession 32.2–3). Christ’s raising of the girl is a firstfruits and pledge of the resurrection He secures by His own death and rising.
Why is this question important? Because Christ’s power over death is the ground of the believer’s ultimate hope. Recognizing that Jesus raises the dead by His own divine authority assures me that He is God and that my own resurrection is secure in Him. The One who took a dead girl by the hand and said “Arise” will do the same for all who are His, so that death’s dominion is broken for the people of God.
Cross References
Comparative Gospel Study
Mark 5:1–43 is recorded, with variations, in all three Synoptic Gospels; John does not include these episodes. The parallels are Matthew 8:28–9:1 (demoniac) and Matthew 9:18–26 (Jairus and the woman), and Luke 8:26–56 (all three). Harmonizing the accounts illumines Mark’s distinctive vividness and each Evangelist’s emphasis:
- The demoniac(s) (Mark 5:1–20; Matthew 8:28–34; Luke 8:26–39). Matthew mentions two demoniacs, while Mark and Luke focus on one — likely the more prominent and vocal, the man who became a witness. Matthew is characteristically brief, omitting the name “Legion,” the man’s request to remain, and the commission to the Decapolis, all of which Mark preserves in rich detail. Luke, like Mark, records the man “clothed and in his right mind” and the region’s fear. There is no contradiction: Matthew notes two, Mark and Luke spotlight one, a common feature of eyewitness selectivity.
- The location (Gerasenes / Gadarenes / Gergesenes). The manuscript variants across the Gospels (Mark: Gerasenes; some texts Gadarenes or Gergesenes) reflect the broader region of the Decapolis on the eastern shore; the differences concern the naming of an area, not conflicting geography.
- Jairus’s daughter (Mark 5:21–24, 35–43; Matthew 9:18–19, 23–26; Luke 8:40–42, 49–56). Matthew compresses the account, having Jairus say his daughter “has just died” (Matthew 9:18), whereas Mark and Luke record the two-stage sequence — “at the point of death,” then the report of her death. Matthew telescopes the narrative; Mark and Luke give the fuller unfolding. Mark alone preserves the Aramaic “Talitha cumi” and the detail that she was twelve and should be given food.
- The woman with the discharge (Mark 5:25–34; Matthew 9:20–22; Luke 8:43–48). All three record the twelve years, the touch, and “your faith has made you well.” Mark and Luke add that she had spent all on physicians (Mark more pointedly: “was no better but rather grew worse”; Luke, a physician, more gently: “could not be healed by anyone”). Mark and Luke record Jesus’ awareness that “power had gone out,” which Matthew omits.
- The intercalation. Mark and Luke both preserve the “sandwich” of the woman’s healing within the raising of the daughter, so that the woman’s faith instructs Jairus to keep believing when told his daughter is dead. The two miracles interpret one another: both center on the number twelve, both require faith, and both display Christ’s power over uncleanness and death.
Taken together, the Synoptics present a unified witness to Christ’s threefold authority, with Mark’s account the most vivid and detailed, Luke’s the most polished, and Matthew’s the most compressed — each shaped for its audience yet fully harmonious.
Old Testament Connections
Pentateuch. The chapter is saturated with the uncleanness laws of the Torah. The woman’s chronic discharge rendered her perpetually unclean (Leviticus 15:25–27), and contact with corpses and tombs defiled (Numbers 19:11–16), as did the swine (Leviticus 11:7). Christ reverses these defilements, cleansing rather than being defiled, fulfilling the deeper intent of the purity laws that pointed to the need for true cleansing. God’s self-declaration, “I kill and I make alive” (Deuteronomy 32:39), is embodied in the Christ who raises the dead.
Historical Books. The raisings of the dead by Elijah (1 Kings 17:17–24, the widow of Zarephath’s son) and Elisha (2 Kings 4:32–37, the Shunammite’s son) form the closest Old Testament analogues to the raising of Jairus’s daughter. Both prophets stretched themselves over the child and cried to the Lord; Jesus, by contrast, raises by His own word and touch, showing Himself greater than the prophets. Hannah’s song anticipates the theme: “The Lord kills and brings to life; he brings down to Sheol and raises up” (1 Samuel 2:6).
Wisdom Literature. The Psalms voice the cry of the desperate that finds its answer in Christ: “Out of the depths I cry to you, O Lord” (Psalm 130:1); “O Lord… you have brought up my soul from Sheol” (Psalm 30:2–3). The woman and Jairus embody the psalmist’s turning to the Lord when all other help fails: “some trusted in chariots… but we trust in the name of the Lord our God” (cf. Psalm 20:7).
Major Prophets. Isaiah foresees the messianic age when God “will swallow up death forever” (Isaiah 25:8) and the dead shall live (Isaiah 26:19), and depicts the rebellious “who sit in tombs” and eat “pig’s flesh” (Isaiah 65:4) — a striking backdrop to the demoniac among the tombs in the land of swine. Isaiah’s Servant “has borne our griefs and carried our sorrows” (Isaiah 53:4), the Christ who bears the afflictions He heals. The extension of salvation to the Gentiles (Isaiah 49:6, “a light for the nations”) is previewed in the Decapolis witness.
Minor Prophets. Hosea’s promise, “I shall ransom them from the power of Sheol; I shall redeem them from Death” (Hosea 13:14), later cited by Paul (1 Corinthians 15:55), anticipates the conquest of death displayed in the raising of Jairus’s daughter. The prophetic hope that the Lord will bind up and heal His people (Hosea 6:1) finds fulfillment in the Healer of Mark 5.
New Testament Fulfillment
Gospels/Acts. The three miracles of Mark 5 are part of the mighty works that authenticate Jesus as the Christ, the Son of God (John 20:30–31). The raising of Jairus’s daughter joins the raising of the widow of Nain’s son (Luke 7:11–17) and of Lazarus (John 11) as anticipations of Christ’s own resurrection and the general resurrection He guarantees (John 5:28–29). Jesus’ authority over demons continues in the apostolic ministry (Acts 8:7; 16:18; 19:12), and the Gentile witness of the Decapolis demoniac foreshadows the mission “to the end of the earth” (Acts 1:8).
Paul’s Epistles. Paul develops the theology of Christ’s victory over the powers (Colossians 2:15, “he disarmed the rulers and authorities… triumphing over them”), the conquest of death (1 Corinthians 15:54–57, “Death is swallowed up in victory”), and the resurrection hope for those who “have fallen asleep” (1 Thessalonians 4:13–18). The double meaning of sōzō (heal/save) is developed in Paul’s doctrine of salvation by faith (Ephesians 2:8), and the cleansing of the unclean anticipates the sanctifying, purifying work of Christ (Ephesians 5:26; Titus 2:14).
General Epistles/Revelation. James confirms that “the demons believe — and shudder” (James 2:19), exactly the terror-stricken confession of Legion. Hebrews presents Christ’s blood as that which truly “purif[ies] our conscience” where the ceremonial law could only cleanse the flesh (Hebrews 9:13–14), fulfilling the cleansing power displayed with the unclean woman. Revelation announces the final abolition of death, when “death shall be no more” (Revelation 21:4), and Christ holds “the keys of Death and Hades” (Revelation 1:18) — the consummation of the authority over death displayed in the raising of Jairus’s daughter.
Redemptive-Historical Context
Mark 5 unfolds against the grand arc of redemptive history — Creation, Fall, Redemption, and Consummation — and displays the inbreaking of the kingdom of God as Christ begins to reverse the whole reach of the fall. At creation, God made a world “very good” (Genesis 1:31), a realm of life, order, and communion, over which humanity was to exercise dominion under God. There was no demonic bondage, no wasting disease, no death; humanity was made for life in fellowship with the living God, clothed and in its right mind, at rest in the garden.
The fall shattered this order, ushering in the triad of miseries that Mark 5 confronts. Satan, who deceived our first parents, gained a usurping dominion, so that fallen humanity lies under “the power of darkness” (Colossians 1:13), enslaved and dehumanized like the man among the tombs. Disease and decay entered as the wages of sin, the body subject to defiling corruption like the woman’s twelve-year affliction. And death, the ultimate sentence — “you shall surely die” (Genesis 2:17) — reigned over all, claiming even a twelve-year-old girl. The tombs, the swine, the uncleanness, and the corpse in Mark 5 are the very landscape of Genesis 3: a world in bondage to Satan, sickness, and death.
Into this fallen world comes redemption in the person of Jesus Christ, the last Adam and the promised seed of the woman who would crush the serpent’s head (Genesis 3:15). In Mark 5, Christ confronts and overturns, one by one, the three great effects of the fall: He binds the strong man and liberates the demon-possessed, He cleanses the defiled and heals the diseased, and He takes death by the hand and raises the dead. These are not isolated wonders but signs of the kingdom, previews of the comprehensive salvation Christ will accomplish at the cross and empty tomb. There, the Holy One who could not be defiled would bear our defilement, the Lord of life would enter death itself, and in rising would break the power of Satan, sin, and death forever (Hebrews 2:14–15). The cleansing of the unclean woman and the raising of the dead girl are enacted parables of the greater cleansing and greater resurrection secured at Calvary and Easter.
The chapter pulses with the already and not-yet of the kingdom. Already, the kingdom has broken in: demons are cast out, the sick are healed, the dead are raised, and the Gentile Decapolis hears the good news. Yet the full harvest awaits: the demoniac’s neighbors reject Christ, the raised girl will one day die again, and the woman’s healing, glorious as it is, is a sign pointing beyond itself. The decisive victory over Satan, disease, and death is inaugurated but not yet consummated; the church lives between the firstfruits and the final harvest.
At the consummation, what Mark 5 previews will be complete and eternal. Satan will be cast into the lake of fire (Revelation 20:10), every disease and defilement will be banished from the new creation where “nothing unclean will ever enter” (Revelation 21:27), and death itself, “the last enemy,” will be destroyed (1 Corinthians 15:26), so that “death shall be no more, neither shall there be mourning nor crying nor pain” (Revelation 21:4). Mark 5 is thus a compressed gospel: the Son of God invading a fallen world of demons, disease, and death, and by His word and touch beginning the great reversal that His cross will secure and His return will complete, when the cleansed and the raised will dwell forever with the Lord of life.
Systematic Theology Connection
Christ’s Authority over Satan and the Demonic (Christology and Angelology)
The deliverance of the Gerasene demoniac displays Christ’s absolute authority over Satan and demons. The Legion that no chain could bind is powerless before Jesus, begging permission even to enter swine (vv. 9–13). This dramatizes Mark 3:27: the stronger man has come to bind the strong man and plunder his house. Reformed theology affirms the reality of Satan and demons as fallen angels, powerful but wholly subject to God’s sovereign control (Westminster Confession 5.4, God’s providence extends “to the first fall, and all other sins of angels and men”). Christ’s incarnate mission includes the overthrow of the devil’s dominion; He came “to destroy the works of the devil” (1 John 3:8). The demons’ confession, “Son of the Most High God” (v. 7), acknowledges what they cannot resist. The Westminster Larger Catechism (Q. 45) speaks of Christ executing His kingly office by “conquering all their and his enemies,” and (Q. 191) of praying that “Satan [be] trodden under our feet.” Practically, this doctrine frees the believer from bondage and fear: the powers of darkness are real but defeated, unable to act beyond the permission of the sovereign Christ. The Christian resists the devil not in his own strength but in the victory of the Lord who has already begun to plunder his kingdom. Cross-references: Genesis 3:15; Luke 10:18; Colossians 2:15; Hebrews 2:14–15; 1 John 3:8; Revelation 20:10.
The Deity of Christ
Mark 5 presses the deity of Jesus at every turn. The demons confess Him “Son of the Most High God” (v. 7); He commands unclean spirits, heals incurable disease, and raises the dead by His own word — divine prerogatives, for “I kill and I make alive” belongs to God alone (Deuteronomy 32:39; 1 Samuel 2:6). The healed man proclaims of “Jesus” what Jesus called the work of “the Lord” (vv. 19–20). Only God is Lord over demons, disease, and death; by exercising this comprehensive dominion by His own authority, Jesus reveals Himself to be God incarnate. Where Elijah and Elisha raised the dead by prayer to God, Jesus raises by His own word (v. 41), acting not as a channel of divine power but as its source. The Westminster Shorter Catechism (Q. 21) confesses “the Lord Jesus Christ, who, being the eternal Son of God, became man,” and the Larger Catechism (Q. 36–39) grounds His mediatorial work in His full deity and humanity. Reformed Christology insists that the Redeemer must be God to conquer sin, Satan, and death, and man to represent and redeem us. Practically, the deity of Christ secures the sufficiency of His salvation: the One who saves us is God Himself, and His power over every enemy is infinite. Faith may rest wholly on Him. Cross-references: Deuteronomy 32:39; Psalm 130:7–8; John 1:1; 5:21; 11:25; Colossians 1:15–20; Hebrews 1:3.
Saving Faith
The chapter is a study in faith: Jairus’s imperfect but real faith (v. 23), the woman’s trembling touch (vv. 27–28), and Christ’s summons, “Do not fear, only believe” (v. 36). Jesus repeatedly commends faith — “your faith has made you well” (v. 34) — locating the instrument by which His power is received. Saving faith is trust in Christ that lays hold of Him and His power; its efficacy lies not in its strength or purity but in its object, the mighty Savior. The Westminster Confession (14.1–3) defines faith as the grace whereby the elect “receive and rest upon Christ alone for salvation,” a faith that may be “weak or strong,” “often and many ways assailed and weakened, but getting the victory.” The woman’s superstition-tinged faith and Jairus’s presence-bound faith were both imperfect, yet both truly reached Christ and received His grace. Reformed theology guards that faith is the instrumental, not meritorious, cause of salvation — “the alone instrument of justification” (Westminster Confession 11.2), the empty hand that receives Christ. Calvin: “it is faith alone which obtains everything from Christ.” Practically, this doctrine invites the weak and trembling to come as they are, trusting Christ rather than the strength of their own believing, and assures them that a small faith in a great Savior obtains everything. Cross-references: Mark 9:24; Romans 4:20–21; 10:17; Ephesians 2:8; Hebrews 11:6; 1 Peter 1:8–9.
The Holiness of Christ and the Purity of the Unclean
Mark 5 reveals a paradox at the heart of Christ’s holiness: contact with the unclean — the demon-possessed, the perpetually bleeding woman, the corpse — does not defile Him but cleanses them. Under the law, uncleanness was contagious (Leviticus 15; Numbers 19); in Christ, holiness proves the stronger, redemptive power. Christ’s holiness is not fragile purity that must be quarantined but a conquering, cleansing power that overcomes defilement and makes the unclean whole. The ceremonial laws of purity were types “prefiguring Christ” (Westminster Confession 19.3), pointing to the true cleansing He provides. Where the law could only diagnose and separate uncleanness, Christ removes it, foreshadowing the cleansing of conscience by His blood (Hebrews 9:13–14). The Reformed tradition sees in the purity laws a schoolmaster pointing to the holiness of God and the need for a cleansing the law itself could not supply. Sinclair Ferguson notes that Jesus is uniquely the one whose contact with uncleanness results in cleansing, not defilement. Practically, this doctrine assures the defiled sinner that no uncleanness places him beyond Christ’s purifying grace; the untouchable may touch Christ and be made clean. It also summons believers to holiness, “for it is written, ‘You shall be holy, for I am holy’” (1 Peter 1:16), a holiness received from and rooted in Christ. Cross-references: Leviticus 15:25–27; Isaiah 6:3–7; Hebrews 9:13–14; 10:19–22; 1 Peter 1:15–16.
The Providence of God in Suffering
The chapter is filled with providentially ordered suffering: twelve years of hemorrhage, a father’s dying child, a delay that permits death to strike. Yet in each, God’s sovereign wisdom is bringing about greater good. The delay caused by the woman’s healing means Jairus must face his daughter’s death — and receive a greater miracle, a resurrection rather than a healing. God’s providence governs even our afflictions and delays, weaving them into a wise and loving purpose that often exceeds what we would have asked. The Westminster Confession (5.1) teaches that God “doth uphold, direct, dispose, and govern all creatures, actions, and things… by his most wise and holy providence,” and (5.7) that His providence “in a most special manner… taketh care of his church, and disposeth all things to the good thereof.” The woman’s long suffering drove her at last to Christ; Jairus’s devastating delay opened the way for a greater display of glory. Reformed theology holds that God ordains the ends and the means, including trials, for His glory and His people’s good (Romans 8:28). Practically, this doctrine sustains believers in prolonged and painful trials, assuring them that no suffering is meaningless or outside God’s control, and that His delays are not denials but often the prelude to greater mercies. Cross-references: Genesis 50:20; Job 1:12; 42:2; Psalm 119:71; Romans 8:28; 2 Corinthians 4:17.
The Resurrection and Christ’s Lordship over Death
The raising of Jairus’s daughter proclaims Christ as Lord over death and anticipates the resurrection. He calls death “sleep” (v. 39) and reverses it with a word (v. 41), exercising the divine prerogative to give life. Christ is “the resurrection and the life” (John 11:25); His power over death is the ground of the believer’s hope of bodily resurrection. The Westminster Confession (32.2–3) teaches that “at the last day… all the dead shall be raised up with the selfsame bodies,” Christ’s power the guarantee. The raising of the girl is a firstfruits and pledge of Christ’s own resurrection, by which He “abolished death and brought life and immortality to light” (2 Timothy 1:10), and of the general resurrection when “all who are in the tombs will hear his voice” (John 5:28–29). Reformed eschatology holds death to be a real but defeated enemy for the believer, “the last enemy to be destroyed” (1 Corinthians 15:26), a sleep before the waking. Practically, this doctrine transforms the believer’s approach to death and grief: death is not the end but a sleep, and the Christ who took a dead girl by the hand will raise all who are His. It fills the mourner with hope and robs death of its terror. Cross-references: 1 Samuel 2:6; John 5:28–29; 11:25–26; 1 Corinthians 15:20–26, 54–57; 1 Thessalonians 4:13–18; Revelation 1:18.
Sovereign Grace to the Gentiles and the Outsider
The deliverance in the Gentile Decapolis, and the healed man’s proclamation there (vv. 19–20), display God’s sovereign grace reaching beyond Israel to the nations and the outcast. The unclean Gentile demoniac becomes the first herald of Christ in pagan territory, a preview of the covenant’s extension to all peoples. God’s saving grace is free and sovereign, reaching the Gentile, the outcast, the unclean, and the despised, according to His own gracious purpose. The Westminster Confession (7.5–6) traces the administration of the covenant of grace to Jew and Gentile alike, “held forth in more fullness… to all nations” under the gospel. Reformed theology sees in the Gentile mission the fulfillment of God’s promise that in Abraham “all the families of the earth shall be blessed” (Genesis 12:3), realized in the ingathering of the nations (Isaiah 49:6; Acts 1:8). The diverse company drawn to Christ in Mark 5 — Gentile demoniac, Jewish ruler, unclean woman — testifies that grace levels every distinction. Practically, this doctrine grounds the church’s mission to all peoples and assures every outsider that Christ’s grace is not limited by ethnicity, status, or defilement. Cross-references: Genesis 12:3; Isaiah 49:6; Malachi 1:11; Acts 1:8; Romans 9:24–26; Ephesians 2:11–19.
Union with Christ and the Language of Salvation
The repeated verb sōzō — “made well/saved” (vv. 23, 28, 34) — unites physical healing and spiritual salvation, and Christ’s drawing of the woman into open confession and family (“Daughter,” v. 34) points to the union and communion believers have with Him. Faith unites the woman to Christ, and from Him “power had gone out” (v. 30) to heal and save. Salvation is found in union with Christ, from whom every saving benefit flows to those who touch Him by faith. The Westminster Larger Catechism (Q. 65–66) teaches that the elect enjoy “union and communion with him in grace and glory,” a union “whereby they are joined to Christ as their head and husband.” The woman’s transformation from unclean outcast to acknowledged “Daughter” pictures the believer’s passage from alienation to adoption in Christ. Reformed theology, following Calvin, makes union with Christ the fountain of all saving benefits: apart from union with Him, all He has done “remains useless and of no value for us” (Institutes 3.1.1). Practically, this doctrine directs the believer to seek not merely Christ’s gifts but Christ Himself, in whom healing, cleansing, salvation, and belonging are all found. To touch Christ by faith is to be joined to Him and to receive all that He is. Cross-references: John 15:4–5; Romans 6:5; 8:1; 1 Corinthians 1:30; 6:17; Galatians 2:20; Ephesians 1:3.
Reformed Theology
Mark 5 is a rich display of Reformed conviction, showcasing the sovereign, saving power of Christ over the whole domain of the fall — Satan, sin’s defilement, and death — and the faith by which that power is received. The chapter unfolds the Reformed understanding of the inbreaking kingdom of God: in Christ, the reign of God has drawn near (Mark 1:15), and the Son of God, as the stronger man (Mark 3:27), invades the kingdom of darkness to bind the strong man and liberate his captives. Geerhardus Vos and the redemptive-historical tradition read these miracles not as isolated wonders but as signs of the kingdom, firstfruits of the comprehensive redemption Christ secures at the cross and consummates at His return. The three deliverances — from demons, disease, and death — together map the extent of the fall and the reach of grace.
The chapter’s Christ-centeredness is thoroughly Reformed. Christ’s deity shines in His exercise of divine prerogatives: commanding demons, cleansing the unclean, and raising the dead by His own authoritative word, where the prophets could only pray for God’s intervention (contrast 1 Kings 17:21; 2 Kings 4:33 with Mark 5:41). Calvin insists that in these works “the divine power of Christ shone forth,” authenticating Him as the Son of God. The holiness of Christ, far from being endangered by contact with the unclean, proves the conquering, cleansing power that the ceremonial law could only foreshadow — a truth Reformed theology grounds in the typological reading of the purity laws as “prefiguring Christ” (Westminster Confession 19.3). Where Leviticus quarantined uncleanness, Christ removes it, anticipating the cleansing of the conscience by His blood (Hebrews 9:14).
The Reformed doctrine of faith is everywhere on display. Jairus and the woman come with imperfect, trembling faith, yet Christ receives, honors, and strengthens it, teaching that faith’s power lies not in its strength but in its object. The Westminster Confession (14.3) frames precisely this: faith may be “weak or strong,” “often and many ways assailed and weakened, but getting the victory.” Sinclair Ferguson stresses that Christ deals gently with weak faith, drawing it into fuller assurance, as He drew the woman from anonymous cure to the tender word “Daughter.” R.C. Sproul emphasized that the object of faith, not the quantity, is decisive — a great Savior grasped by a small faith saves fully. The command “only believe” (v. 36) captures the Reformed insistence that faith is the instrument, not the ground, of salvation, receiving Christ and resting in Him alone (Westminster Confession 11.2).
The chapter also exhibits the Reformed doctrines of providence and sovereign grace. The delay that permits Jairus’s daughter to die, ordained for a greater display of glory, illustrates God’s wise governance of all things, including suffering, for His glory and His people’s good (Westminster Confession 5.1, 5.7; Romans 8:28). The reaching of grace into the Gentile Decapolis, and to the unclean woman and the desperate ruler alike, displays the free, sovereign, and comprehensive scope of God’s saving mercy, which levels every distinction (Ephesians 2:11–19). And the raising of the dead girl grounds the Reformed hope of bodily resurrection, Christ being “the resurrection and the life” whose word will one day empty every grave (John 5:28–29; Westminster Confession 32). In Mark 5, the Reformed gospel stands in miniature: the sovereign Son of God, mighty over Satan, defilement, and death, cleansing the unclean and raising the dead, receiving the trembling faith of desperate sinners and drawing them into saving union with Himself — a preview of the whole redemption He secures by His cross and will consummate at His coming.
Dispensational Theology
A Dispensational reading of Mark 5, employing a consistently literal-grammatical hermeneutic, understands these miracles as authenticating signs of the Messiah offering the kingdom to Israel, and as displays of the “kingdom power” that characterized Christ’s earthly ministry. Dispensationalists such as J. Dwight Pentecost and John Walvoord hold that Jesus came presenting Himself as Israel’s promised King, and that His miracles — casting out demons, healing disease, raising the dead — were the credentials of the kingdom, the “powers of the age to come” (Hebrews 6:5) breaking into the present to validate the King and His offer. The mighty works of Mark 5 thus function within the Gospels’ presentation of the bona fide offer of the messianic kingdom to the covenant nation.
The literal-grammatical hermeneutic takes the miracles as genuine, historical events exactly as narrated: a real exorcism, a real healing, a real raising of the dead. Dispensationalists resist any spiritualizing that would empty the accounts of their literal force, insisting that Jesus literally cast out demons, literally healed the woman, and literally raised the girl. These are understood as foretastes of the conditions of the future millennial kingdom (Revelation 20:1–6), when Satan will be bound (Revelation 20:2), disease and death will be curtailed under the reign of Christ (Isaiah 65:20–25), and the curse will be substantially lifted. What Christ did in a limited way in Galilee and the Decapolis previews what He will do universally when He reigns on David’s throne.
Dispensationalism maintains a clear distinction between Israel and the Church. The miracles of Mark 5 occur during the “dispensation of the law” or the transitional period of Christ’s earthly ministry to Israel, before the church was formed at Pentecost (Acts 2). The exorcism in the Gentile Decapolis is noted by Dispensationalists as an anticipatory foreshadowing of the wider Gentile blessing that comes in the present church age and will be consummated in the kingdom, when “the earth shall be full of the knowledge of the Lord” (Isaiah 11:9). Yet the primary frame remains the offer of the kingdom to national Israel, whose fuller inclusion awaits the future when “all Israel will be saved” (Romans 11:26) and God’s literal covenant promises of land, throne, and kingdom are fulfilled.
On the doctrines of grace, Dispensationalists wholeheartedly affirm that salvation is by faith in Christ, and they highlight the prominence of faith in the chapter — “your faith has made you well” (v. 34) and “only believe” (v. 36). They stress human responsibility to respond in faith to the King and His works, and note that Christ commends the faith of the woman and calls Jairus to believe against all appearances. Classical and revised Dispensationalists (Scofield, Ryrie, Walvoord, Pentecost) emphasize the futurist and literal reading of the kingdom and Israel’s national future, while Progressive Dispensationalists (Blaising, Bock) allow a more developed “already/not yet” inauguration of the kingdom in Christ’s first coming, seeing the miracles as a present, if partial, manifestation of the reign to come. For the Dispensationalist, Mark 5 sets forth the authenticating signs of Israel’s Messiah — literal power over demons, disease, and death — foreshadowing the conditions of the coming millennial kingdom, received by faith, while God’s distinct, literal covenant promises to national Israel await their future fulfillment under the reign of Christ the King.
Bibliography
- Bavinck, Herman. Reformed Dogmatics. 4 vols. Ed. John Bolt, trans. John Vriend. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2003–2008.
- Beale, G. K. A New Testament Biblical Theology: The Unfolding of the Old Testament in the New. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2011.
- Blaising, Craig A., and Darrell L. Bock. Progressive Dispensationalism. Wheaton: Victor/Bridgepoint, 1993.
- Calvin, John. Commentary on a Harmony of the Evangelists, Matthew, Mark, and Luke. Trans. William Pringle. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans (Calvin Translation Society edition).
- Calvin, John. Institutes of the Christian Religion. Trans. Ford Lewis Battles. Philadelphia: Westminster Press, 1960.
- Cranfield, C. E. B. The Gospel According to St Mark. Cambridge Greek Testament Commentary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1959.
- Edwards, James R. The Gospel According to Mark. Pillar New Testament Commentary. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2002.
- Ferguson, Sinclair B. Let’s Study Mark. Edinburgh: Banner of Truth, 1999.
- France, R. T. The Gospel of Mark. New International Greek Testament Commentary. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2002.
- Henry, Matthew. Commentary on the Whole Bible. Vol. 5 (Matthew to John). Various editions.
- Hendriksen, William. Exposition of the Gospel According to Mark. New Testament Commentary. Grand Rapids: Baker, 1975.
- Lane, William L. The Gospel According to Mark. New International Commentary on the New Testament. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1974.
- Murray, John. Redemption Accomplished and Applied. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1955.
- Pentecost, J. Dwight. Things to Come: A Study in Biblical Eschatology. Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1958.
- Piper, John. Desiring God: Meditations of a Christian Hedonist. Sisters: Multnomah, 2003.
- Poole, Matthew. A Commentary on the Holy Bible. Vol. 3. London: Banner of Truth (reprint).
- Ryrie, Charles C. Dispensationalism. Rev. ed. Chicago: Moody, 1995.
- Scofield, C. I. The Scofield Reference Bible. New York: Oxford University Press, 1909.
- Spurgeon, Charles H. The Metropolitan Tabernacle Pulpit. London: Passmore & Alabaster.
- Sproul, R. C. Mark: An Expositional Commentary. Sanford: Reformation Trust, 2011.
- Vos, Geerhardus. Biblical Theology: Old and New Testaments. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1948.
- Walvoord, John F. Matthew: Thy Kingdom Come. Chicago: Moody, 1974.
- The Westminster Confession of Faith and the Larger and Shorter Catechisms. Various editions.

Leave a Reply