The Berean Table

Field	Detail
Pericope	Matthew 1:1–25
Theme	The opening of the Gospel — the genealogy that presents Jesus as the Christ, the son of David and the son of Abraham, tracing the covenant line through fourteen generations from Abraham to David, from David to the exile, and from the exile to the Messiah; the surprising inclusion of Tamar, Rahab, Ruth, the wife of Uriah, and Mary in a Gospel of grace to sinners; and the annunciation to Joseph of the virgin conception by the Holy Spirit, the naming of the child Jesus who will save His people from their sins, and the fulfillment of Isaiah’s Immanuel prophecy — God with us

---

Opening Prayer

---

Closing Prayer

---

Timeline Context

The Gospel of Matthew stands first among the four Gospels and first in the New Testament canon, forming the deliberate hinge between the Old Testament and the New. Matthew, a former tax collector called by Jesus (Matthew 9:9; 10:3), wrote primarily for a Jewish-Christian readership, and his opening chapter is calibrated for that audience: it demonstrates that Jesus of Nazareth is the long-awaited Messiah, the rightful heir of David’s throne and the true seed of Abraham in whom all nations are blessed. Most scholars date the Gospel to the decades before A.D. 70, in the era of the early church’s expansion, when the question of Jesus’ messianic credentials was pressing for Jewish believers and their critics alike.

The genealogy (1:1–17) reaches back roughly two thousand years to Abraham (circa 2000 B.C.), tracing the covenant line down through the patriarchs, the monarchy of David and Solomon (circa 1000 B.C.), the long decline of the divided kingdom, the catastrophe of the Babylonian exile (586 B.C.), the return under Zerubbabel, and the silent centuries down to the birth of Christ. Matthew organizes this vast span into three sets of fourteen generations, marking three great redemptive-historical epochs: promise (Abraham to David), monarchy (David to the exile), and the long night of waiting (exile to Messiah).

The birth narrative (1:18–25) unfolds in first-century Judea and Galilee under Roman rule, in the days of Herod the Great (cf. 2:1), king of Judea by grant of Rome (37–4 B.C.). Betrothal (mnēsteuō) in Jewish custom was a legally binding covenant, more than a modern engagement, so that Joseph is already called Mary’s “husband” and could only be released by divorce. Redemptive-historically, this chapter marks the turning of the ages: the “fullness of time” (Galatians 4:4) when the promises made to Abraham and David converge in a single child conceived by the Holy Spirit. The long story of Israel’s failure and exile, of longing and delay, reaches its appointed climax. God, who had spoken in many portions and many ways by the prophets, now speaks by His Son (Hebrews 1:1–2). The genealogy is not a dry preface but the announcement that the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob has kept His word.

---

Historical-Grammatical Study

Genre. Matthew is a Gospel — a theological biography that proclaims the person and work of Jesus as fulfillment of God’s redemptive purpose. Chapter 1 combines two ancient forms: the genealogy (Hebrew toledoth, “generations”), a recognized biblical genre for tracing covenant lines (Genesis 5; 10; 11; 1 Chronicles 1–9), and the birth-annunciation narrative, patterned after Old Testament annunciations (Genesis 16; 18; Judges 13; 1 Samuel 1). Matthew’s genealogy is not a bare record but a theological argument arranged for a purpose.

Key grammatical and syntactical features.

• “The book of the genealogy” (biblos geneseōs, v. 1). This phrase echoes the Septuagint of Genesis 2:4 and 5:1 (biblos geneseōs), evoking the “book of generations” and even a new genesis, a new beginning of creation in Christ. Some read it as a heading for the whole Gospel or at least the whole birth account.
• “Jesus Christ” (Iēsous Christos, v. 1). Iēsous is the Greek form of the Hebrew Yeshua/Yehoshua, “the LORD saves.” Christos renders the Hebrew Māshîaḥ, “anointed one,” the royal-priestly title of the promised deliverer. Matthew fuses the personal name and the office in his opening line.
• “Son of David, the son of Abraham” (v. 1). The order is climactic and inverted for emphasis: David (the royal covenant, 2 Samuel 7) named first, then Abraham (the foundational covenant, Genesis 12; 15; 17). Both covenants find their heir in Jesus.
• “Was the father of” (egennēsen, “begot,” repeated throughout). The active aorist “begot” drives the genealogy forward relentlessly — until verse 16, where the pattern breaks: not “Joseph begot Jesus,” but “Joseph the husband of Mary, of whom (ex hēs, feminine singular) Jesus was born.” The Greek deliberately signals that Jesus was not begotten by Joseph.
• “Fourteen generations” (v. 17). The threefold fourteen is likely a mnemonic and theological device. In Hebrew, the name David (DWD) has the numerical value fourteen (D=4, W=6, D=4) — gematria pointing to the son of David. The scheme telescopes the genealogy (omitting some kings), a normal ancient practice, to make the pattern plain.
• “Betrothed” (mnēsteutheisēs, v. 18). Betrothal was a binding covenant; unfaithfulness during it counted as adultery, and its dissolution required a certificate of divorce.
• “From the Holy Spirit” (ek Pneumatos Hagiou, vv. 18, 20). The preposition ek (“out of, from”) marks the origin of the conception in the Spirit, not in any man — the doctrine of the virginal conception.
• “A just man” (dikaios, v. 19). Joseph is “righteous,” law-abiding yet merciful, “unwilling to put her to shame.”
• “You shall call his name Jesus, for he will save” (v. 21). A wordplay in the underlying Hebrew: Yeshua (“the LORD saves”) explained by “he will save” (sōsei) his people from their sins.
• “Immanuel” (v. 23). From Isaiah 7:14, ʿimmānû ʾēl, “God with us,” which Matthew translates for his readers, framing the whole Gospel (cf. 28:20, “I am with you always”).

First-century background. Genealogies mattered intensely in Second Temple Judaism, establishing tribal, priestly, and royal claims (cf. Ezra 2:62; Nehemiah 7:64). Messianic hope centered on a coming son of David (Psalm 89; Isaiah 11; Jeremiah 23:5–6). Public records of descent were kept, and Matthew’s genealogy would carry evidential weight. Betrothal customs, the shame culture surrounding suspected adultery, and dream-revelation as a mode of divine communication (as with the patriarch Joseph, Genesis 37; 40–41) all form the cultural backdrop.

Covenantal themes. The chapter is saturated with covenant. The Abrahamic covenant (Genesis 12:1–3; 17:7) promised a seed who would bless the nations; the Davidic covenant (2 Samuel 7:12–16) promised an everlasting throne. Matthew presents Jesus as heir of both, the one in whom the covenant of grace reaches its fulfillment. The naming of the child (“he will save his people from their sins”) and the title Immanuel (“God with us”) announce the very heart of the new covenant: forgiveness of sins and God dwelling with His people (Jeremiah 31:31–34; Ezekiel 37:26–27).

---

Expanded Outline

Section 1 — The Superscription: Jesus Christ, Son of David, Son of Abraham (Matthew 1:1)

Key Insight

Matthew opens the New Testament with a single, weighty sentence: “The book of the genealogy of Jesus Christ, the son of David, the son of Abraham” (v. 1). Every word is loaded. “The book of the genealogy” (biblos geneseōs) deliberately echoes Genesis (2:4; 5:1 LXX), so that the first Gospel opens with the language of the first book of the Bible. Matthew signals that the coming of Christ is nothing less than a new genesis, a new creation, the true beginning toward which the whole Old Testament had been straining. The Gospel does not float free of Israel’s story; it is the story’s consummation.

The name “Jesus” (Iēsous, Hebrew Yeshua, “the LORD saves”) is joined immediately to the office “Christ” (Christos, “Anointed,” the Messiah). In his very first line Matthew stakes his entire claim: this Jesus is the Christ, the anointed King, Prophet, and Priest whom Israel awaited. Then come two titles that structure the whole genealogy and the whole Gospel. “The son of David” points to the royal covenant of 2 Samuel 7, where God promised David an offspring whose throne would be established forever. Matthew names David first — out of chronological order — to press the messianic, kingly claim to the front. Throughout the Gospel, the crowds and the desperate will cry to Jesus as “Son of David” (Matthew 9:27; 15:22; 20:30; 21:9). Calvin observes that Christ is called the son of David “because the promise had been given to David, that the perpetual succession of his kingdom should terminate in Christ.”

“The son of Abraham” reaches back to the foundational covenant of Genesis 12 and 17: the promise of a seed in whom “all the families of the earth shall be blessed” (Genesis 12:3). Paul teaches that this promised seed is Christ (Galatians 3:16), and that in Him the blessing flows to the Gentiles. By naming both David and Abraham, Matthew declares that Jesus is at once the King of Israel and the source of blessing to all nations. The two covenants — royal and universal — meet and are fulfilled in this one child. Matthew Henry notes that Christ “is the son of Abraham and the son of David, the persons that the promises of the Messiah were in a special manner made to.” The superscription thus functions as a title over the entire Gospel: here is the King of the Jews who is also the Savior of the world, the fulfillment of every covenant promise, the new beginning of God’s saving work.

Application

This opening verse teaches us to read Scripture as one unified, promise-keeping story that finds its center in Christ. First, see Jesus as the fulfillment of God’s ancient promises. Your faith does not rest on novelty but on a God who has been working out one purpose across millennia. When you feel that God is slow or silent, remember that He kept every promise culminating in Christ, and He will keep His promises to you. Second, rejoice that the King has come for all nations. Because Jesus is the son of Abraham, the gospel is not for one people only; the blessing has reached you. Third, worship the God who makes new beginnings. The “book of the genealogy” is the book of a new creation; in Christ, “the old has passed away; behold, the new has come” (2 Corinthians 5:17). Beware two misapplications: treating the Old Testament as irrelevant to the gospel (Matthew ties them inseparably together), and reducing Jesus to a mere teacher when Matthew presents Him as the covenant King. Read the whole Bible looking for Christ, trust the God who keeps His word, and rest in the King who has come for you.

---

Section 2 — From Abraham to David: The Age of Promise (Matthew 1:2–6a)

Key Insight

Matthew now begins the genealogy proper, and the first fourteen generations run from Abraham to David the king: “Abraham was the father of Isaac, and Isaac the father of Jacob, and Jacob the father of Judah and his brothers” (v. 2). This is the age of promise, the patriarchal foundation of the covenant people. The line runs through Isaac (the child of promise, not Ishmael the child of the flesh, Genesis 21; Galatians 4:22–31) and Jacob (the younger, chosen over Esau, Romans 9:11–13), reminding us at once that the covenant line advances not by natural right or human merit but by God’s sovereign, gracious election. Judah is named “and his brothers,” anticipating the twelve tribes, yet the messianic line runs through Judah, of whom Jacob prophesied that the scepter would not depart until Shiloh came (Genesis 49:10).

Then comes the first of Matthew’s remarkable inclusions: “Judah the father of Perez and Zerah by Tamar” (v. 3). Tamar was the Canaanite daughter-in-law wronged by Judah, who secured her place in the line through a scandalous episode (Genesis 38). That Matthew names her at all is arresting; genealogies of this period customarily named only men. By including Tamar — and, as we will see, Rahab, Ruth, and Bathsheba — Matthew signals from the outset that the Messiah comes through a line marked by sin, scandal, and the surprising grace of God. The line continues through Perez, Hezron, Ram, Amminadab, Nahshon (a leader in the wilderness, Numbers 1:7), and Salmon, “the father of Boaz by Rahab” (v. 5). Rahab the Canaanite prostitute of Jericho, saved by faith (Joshua 2; 6; Hebrews 11:31; James 2:25), is grafted into the messianic line.

“Boaz the father of Obed by Ruth” (v. 5) brings in Ruth the Moabitess, a foreigner from a people excluded from the assembly (Deuteronomy 23:3), yet a woman of extraordinary faith and loyalty whose story fills the book that bears her name. “Obed the father of Jesse, and Jesse the father of David the king” (vv. 5–6). The age of promise culminates in David, and Matthew alone here adds the title “the king,” marking the arrival of the monarchy and the Davidic covenant. The line from Abraham to David is a tapestry of God’s faithfulness woven through weak and sinful people, Gentiles and outcasts, until it flowers in the king from whom Messiah would come. Spurgeon marveled that “the pedigree of the Savior is studded with sinners,” so that “there is hope for the vilest” in the Christ who sprang from such a line. Matthew Henry observes that these women were included “to take away the reproach” of the Gentiles and to show that “in Jesus Christ there is neither Jew nor Greek.”

Application

This section preaches the sovereign grace of God to unlikely people. First, marvel that God builds His redemptive line through sinners and outsiders. Tamar, Rahab, and Ruth had every reason to be excluded, yet grace grafted them in. If God wove such people into the ancestry of the Messiah, no sinner is beyond the reach of His grace, and no past is too shameful for His redemption. Second, rest in God’s electing love, not your pedigree or performance. The line advanced by Isaac over Ishmael, Jacob over Esau — by grace, not by natural right. Your standing before God rests on His choice in Christ, not your bloodline or your record. Third, welcome the outsider. The inclusion of Gentile women foreshadows the ingathering of the nations; a church that cherishes only its own kind has forgotten the genealogy of its Lord. Beware two misapplications: presuming that a religious heritage guarantees favor (John the Baptist warned against boasting “we have Abraham as our father,” Matthew 3:9), and despairing that your sin excludes you from grace when the very line of Christ is “studded with sinners.” Come to the Savior born of such a line, and welcome others as He welcomed them.

---

Section 3 — From David to the Exile: The Age of Monarchy and Decline (Matthew 1:6b–11)

Key Insight

The second set of fourteen generations runs from David through the kings of Judah down to the Babylonian exile. Matthew begins with the great turning point and the great scandal of David’s reign: “And David was the father of Solomon by the wife of Uriah” (v. 6). Matthew does not even name Bathsheba here, but pointedly calls her “the wife of Uriah,” keeping David’s grievous sin of adultery and murder (2 Samuel 11) fresh in the reader’s memory, so that even the greatest king appears in the line as a forgiven sinner, not a spotless hero. The Messiah’s royal ancestry is no monument to human righteousness; it is a testimony to grace that triumphs over the darkest failure.

From Solomon the line runs through the kings of Judah: “Rehoboam… Abijah… Asaph… Jehoshaphat… Joram… Uzziah… Jotham… Ahaz… Hezekiah… Manasseh… Amos… Josiah” (vv. 7–11). This roll call is a sobering history of the monarchy — a mixture of a few godly reformers (Jehoshaphat, Hezekiah, Josiah) and many wicked idolaters (Rehoboam, Ahaz, Manasseh). Matthew telescopes the list, omitting several kings (Ahaziah, Joash, and Amaziah are passed over between Joram and Uzziah), a common and legitimate ancient practice to preserve the pattern of fourteen. The point is not exhaustive record but redemptive-historical shape. The line that began with such promise in David declined through generations of covenant unfaithfulness, until the throne was lost and the people carried into exile.

The section ends in catastrophe: “Josiah the father of Jechoniah and his brothers, at the time of the deportation to Babylon” (v. 11). The Babylonian exile of 586 B.C. was the great trauma of Israel’s history — the destruction of Jerusalem and the temple, the end of the Davidic monarchy, and the apparent collapse of every covenant promise. To Jewish eyes it looked as though God’s word had failed. Yet Matthew includes the exile as a deliberate hinge in his three-part scheme, because even Israel’s deepest judgment could not annul God’s promise; the line survives the exile and presses on toward the Christ. The prophets had promised that a shoot would come from the stump of Jesse (Isaiah 11:1) — a stump, precisely because the tree of the monarchy had been cut down. Calvin notes that God “preserved a remnant” and kept the royal line alive through the darkest days, so that His covenant with David might not fail. Even the mention of Jechoniah, under whom the line seemed cursed (Jeremiah 22:30, “none of his offspring shall succeed in sitting on the throne of David”), only magnifies the grace by which God would raise up the true King through a virgin, apart from the ordinary succession. The age of monarchy teaches that human kings fail, but God’s covenant King is coming, and no failure of men can defeat the purpose of God.

Application

This section confronts us with human sin and divine faithfulness intertwined. First, let David’s inclusion as “the father of Solomon by the wife of Uriah” humble and comfort you. The greatest saint was a great sinner, restored by grace; your worst failures, brought to God in repentance, cannot cancel His covenant love, though they must never be excused or repeated. Second, learn from the failure of the kings that no human leader can save. Generation after generation the throne disappointed. Fix your hope not on any human ruler, church, or movement, but on the King who never fails. Third, trust God’s faithfulness through your own seasons of exile. When everything seems lost — health, relationships, hope itself — remember that God preserved His promise through Babylon. He is working still. Beware two misapplications: using grace as a license for sin (Romans 6:1–2), and reading providential disaster as proof that God has abandoned His people, when in fact He carries His purpose through the very fire. Repent of your sin, despair of every human savior, and cling to the covenant-keeping God whose King is coming.

---

Section 4 — From the Exile to the Christ: The Age of Waiting and Fulfillment (Matthew 1:12–17)

Key Insight

The third set of fourteen generations runs from the exile to the birth of the Messiah: “And after the deportation to Babylon: Jechoniah was the father of Shealtiel, and Shealtiel the father of Zerubbabel” (v. 12). Zerubbabel was the governor who led the return from exile and rebuilt the temple (Ezra 3; Haggai 2:20–23), a figure of hope in whom God renewed the Davidic promise. But after Zerubbabel and Abiud, the names grow obscure: “Abiud… Eliakim… Azor… Zadok… Achim… Eliud… Eleazar… Matthan… Jacob” (vv. 13–15). These are largely unknown men, unrecorded in the Old Testament, spanning the silent centuries between Malachi and Matthew. Through four hundred years of prophetic silence and political subjection, God quietly preserved the royal line, working unseen through ordinary, forgotten people toward the appointed hour. The line did not glitter; it endured. And its very obscurity magnifies the faithfulness of the God who forgets none of His promises.

Then the pattern that has driven the whole genealogy — “was the father of,” egennēsen, “begot,” repeated some forty times — suddenly breaks: “and Jacob the father of Joseph the husband of Mary, of whom Jesus was born, who is called Christ” (v. 16). Matthew does not write “Joseph the father of Jesus.” He writes that Joseph was “the husband of Mary, of whom (ex hēs, a feminine singular pronoun) Jesus was born.” The Greek deliberately signals that Jesus was born of Mary, not begotten by Joseph — a grammatical preparation for the virgin birth that verses 18–25 will explain. Yet by naming Joseph in the line and calling him Mary’s husband, Matthew establishes Jesus’ legal descent from David through Joseph, His adoptive father, so that Jesus is the rightful heir to the Davidic throne. The child “is called Christ” — the Messiah, the anointed one, has come.

Matthew then draws the whole design together: “So all the generations from Abraham to David were fourteen generations, and from David to the deportation to Babylon fourteen generations, and from the deportation to Babylon to the Christ fourteen generations” (v. 17). The threefold fourteen frames all of redemptive history as a movement toward Christ: promise, monarchy, waiting — and now fulfillment. Matthew declares that all of Israel’s history has been a road leading to this one child, in whom every promise finds its Yes. R. C. Sproul observes that the genealogy “is not a boring list of names but the record of God’s faithfulness in bringing His Son into the world through a chosen line.” D. A. Carson notes that the broken pattern at verse 16 is Matthew’s way of preparing the reader for the extraordinary manner of the Messiah’s birth. Christ is the goal of the generations, the seed of Abraham, the Son of David, the true and final King toward whom history bent.

Application

This section teaches us to trust God’s hidden, patient providence. First, believe that God is working even in the silent, obscure seasons. The unknown names of the post-exilic line remind us that God is faithfully advancing His purposes even when there are no visible signs, no prophets speaking, no obvious progress — He works in the silence. When your life feels forgotten and fruitless, God has not forgotten. Second, see that the whole of history moves toward Christ, and let this reorder your view of the world. History is not random; it is His story, bending toward the King. Third, rejoice that the long waiting ended in fulfillment. God’s people waited four centuries; He came at the appointed time. The God who was never late for Israel will not be late for you. Beware two misapplications: despising the “ordinary” and hidden seasons of life as wasted, and imagining that God’s silence means His absence. Trust the God of the obscure generations, read history as the road to Christ, and wait on the Lord who keeps His appointed time.

---

Section 5 — The Virgin Conception and Joseph’s Righteous Dilemma (Matthew 1:18–20)

Key Insight

Having established Jesus’ legal descent, Matthew turns to the manner of His birth: “Now the birth of Jesus Christ took place in this way. When his mother Mary had been betrothed to Joseph, before they came together she was found to be with child from the Holy Spirit” (v. 18). Betrothal (mnēsteuō) in first-century Judaism was a binding covenant, more than a modern engagement; the couple were legally husband and wife, though not yet living together, and the union could be dissolved only by divorce. Into this settled arrangement comes an astonishing fact: Mary “was found to be with child from the Holy Spirit.” Matthew states plainly and without embarrassment that the conception was by the Holy Spirit, not by any man — the virgin conception, the mystery of the incarnation, at the very threshold of the Gospel. The child in Mary’s womb is no ordinary child but the eternal Son entering our humanity by the creative power of the Spirit (Luke 1:35).

Joseph, of course, did not yet know this. From his vantage, Mary’s pregnancy could mean only one thing, and his response reveals his character: “And her husband Joseph, being a just man and unwilling to put her to shame, resolved to divorce her quietly” (v. 19). Matthew calls Joseph “a just man” (dikaios), righteous, law-observant. The law seemed to require public exposure and severe penalty for suspected adultery (Deuteronomy 22:23–24). Yet Joseph’s righteousness is not rigid legalism; it is tempered by mercy — he was “unwilling to put her to shame” and “resolved to divorce her quietly.” Here is a portrait of true righteousness: faithful to God’s law yet full of compassion, refusing both to condone sin and to crush the sinner. Calvin admired that Joseph “neither cherished hatred nor sought revenge,” and Matthew Henry notes that “he was loath to expose her, or make her a public example.” Joseph’s mercy in his ignorance foreshadows the greater mercy of the child he would raise.

Then God intervenes: “But as he considered these things, behold, an angel of the Lord appeared to him in a dream, saying, ‘Joseph, son of David, do not fear to take Mary as your wife, for that which is conceived in her is from the Holy Spirit’” (v. 20). The angel addresses Joseph as “son of David,” reminding him of his royal lineage and his part in God’s covenant plan. The command “do not fear” answers Joseph’s inner turmoil, and the revelation resolves it: the child is “from the Holy Spirit.” What looked to human eyes like scandal was in fact the greatest wonder in history — God incarnate, conceived by the Spirit in a virgin’s womb. The whole scene teaches the sovereign initiative of God, who breaks into human perplexity with revelation, and the humble faith that receives His word against every natural expectation. The incarnation does not come by human planning or achievement; it comes as pure gift, by the power of the Spirit, received by faith.

Application

This passage instructs us in righteousness, mercy, and faith. First, pursue a righteousness that is both faithful and merciful, like Joseph’s. True godliness neither excuses sin nor delights to expose and shame the sinner. Hold firmly to God’s standards while treating others with the tender mercy you yourself need from God (Micah 6:8; Galatians 6:1). Second, do not rush to judgment when situations look damning. Joseph’s darkest interpretation was utterly wrong; God was doing something glorious behind the appearances. Withhold hasty condemnation, and leave room for God’s hidden work. Third, marvel at and rest in the virgin conception. The salvation you need could not be manufactured by man; it comes down from heaven, conceived by the Spirit, received by faith. Fourth, when perplexed, wait on God for His word. Joseph “considered these things,” and God met him. Beware two misapplications: a harsh “righteousness” that loves to condemn, and a soft “mercy” that abandons God’s truth. Be like Joseph — just and kind — and receive the Christ who is God’s gift, not man’s work.

---

Section 6 — Jesus, Immanuel: The Name and the Prophecy Fulfilled (Matthew 1:21–25)

Key Insight

The angel now unfolds the identity and mission of the child: “She will bear a son, and you shall call his name Jesus, for he will save his people from their sins” (v. 21). The name is chosen by God, not by the parents, and it is freighted with meaning. “Jesus” (Iēsous, Hebrew Yeshua) means “the LORD saves,” and the angel makes the wordplay explicit: “you shall call his name Jesus, for he will save (sōsei) his people from their sins.” The name declares both who this child is and what He came to do: He is the LORD who saves, and the salvation He brings is not primarily from Rome or from earthly enemies, but from sin itself — the deepest bondage of all. This corrects every merely political or nationalistic messianic hope. The great enemy is sin, and this child has come to deal with it. Spurgeon exclaimed that “his very name is a gospel”; and Matthew Henry notes that Jesus “came to be a Savior… to save us from our sins,” which is “the root of all our misery.”

“His people” originally denotes Israel, yet as the Gospel unfolds, the true people of God are those who receive Him from every nation (Matthew 8:11; 28:19). And He saves them “from their sins” — from sin’s guilt by His atoning death, from sin’s power by His indwelling Spirit, and ultimately from sin’s very presence in glory. The whole gospel is compressed into this one verse: a Savior who saves His people from their sins. Everything the rest of Matthew narrates — the teaching, the miracles, the cross, the resurrection — serves this saving mission.

Matthew then adds his characteristic fulfillment formula: “All this took place to fulfill what the Lord had spoken by the prophet: ‘Behold, the virgin shall conceive and bear a son, and they shall call his name Immanuel’ (which means, God with us)” (vv. 22–23). Citing Isaiah 7:14, Matthew shows that the virgin birth was no afterthought but the fulfillment of prophecy spoken centuries before. The name Immanuel, “God with us,” proclaims the staggering truth of the incarnation: in this child, God Himself has come to dwell among His people. This is the theme that frames the entire Gospel, for it ends with Jesus’ promise, “I am with you always, to the end of the age” (Matthew 28:20). G. K. Beale notes that “God with us” points to the true temple, God dwelling with His people in Christ. Finally, Joseph’s obedient faith is recorded: “When Joseph woke from sleep, he did as the angel of the Lord commanded him: he took his wife, but knew her not until she had given birth to a son. And he called his name Jesus” (vv. 24–25). Joseph obeyed at once and fully, taking Mary as his wife, refraining from union until the child was born (guarding the virgin birth), and naming the child Jesus as commanded. Joseph is a model of prompt, humble, believing obedience — he heard God’s word and simply did it.

Application

This section places the gospel and its response before us. First, treasure the name of Jesus and the salvation it announces. Your deepest problem is not your circumstances but your sin, and Jesus came precisely to save you from it. Do not seek from Christ a lesser salvation than the one He came to give — deliverance from the guilt, power, and presence of sin. Second, rest in the wonder of Immanuel, “God with us.” In Christ, God is not distant but near; He has come to dwell with His people and promises never to leave them. Let this comfort you in loneliness, fear, and sorrow — God is with you. Third, imitate Joseph’s prompt, humble obedience. When God speaks, do not delay, negotiate, or explain; do as He commands. Beware two misapplications: wanting Jesus as a helper for earthly problems while resisting Him as Savior from sin, and admiring God’s word without obeying it. Come to the Jesus who saves from sin, rejoice that God is with you, and obey His word as swiftly as Joseph did.

---

Cross References

Comparative Gospel Study

Matthew 1 is Gospel narrative, and it invites direct comparison with the parallel material in Luke, the only other Gospel that records Jesus’ genealogy and infancy. Matthew and Luke offer complementary, not contradictory, accounts of the Savior’s origins.

The two genealogies (Matthew 1:1–17; Luke 3:23–38). Both trace Jesus’ descent, but they differ in structure and emphasis. Matthew, writing to Jews, begins with Abraham and moves forward to Jesus, emphasizing the Abrahamic and Davidic covenants and Jesus’ royal claim to the throne. Luke, writing to a broader Gentile audience, begins with Jesus and moves backward all the way to “Adam, the son of God” (Luke 3:38), emphasizing Jesus’ solidarity with all humanity. Between David and Joseph the two lists diverge sharply: Matthew runs through Solomon and the royal kings of Judah; Luke runs through David’s son Nathan. The historic Reformed explanation, held by Calvin and many since, is that Matthew traces the legal, royal line through Joseph (establishing Jesus’ claim to David’s throne), while Luke may trace the biological line, possibly through Mary, or Joseph’s line by a different reckoning. Either way, both testify that Jesus is truly the Son of David. Matthew’s telescoped three-times-fourteen structure serves his theological aim; Luke’s fuller list serves his universal scope.

The birth narratives (Matthew 1:18–25; Luke 1:26–38; 2:1–20). Both Gospels affirm the virgin conception by the Holy Spirit, but from different angles. Matthew tells the story from Joseph’s perspective — his dilemma, the angel’s dream-revelation, his obedient faith. Luke tells it from Mary’s perspective — Gabriel’s annunciation to her, her question and submission (“let it be to me according to your word,” Luke 1:38), and the Magnificat. Both record that the child is conceived by the Holy Spirit (Matthew 1:20; Luke 1:35), that His name is to be Jesus (Matthew 1:21; Luke 1:31), and that He is the Son of David and Savior. Matthew emphasizes fulfillment of Old Testament prophecy (Isaiah 7:14); Luke emphasizes the songs of praise and the humble circumstances of the birth. Together they present a full portrait: the King born of a virgin, announced to both Joseph and Mary, conceived by the Spirit, named by God, and welcomed by the humble. John’s Gospel supplies the theological summit: “the Word became flesh and dwelt among us” (John 1:14), the eternal Word who is the Immanuel Matthew proclaims.

---

Old Testament Connections

Pentateuch. The genealogy roots Jesus in the Torah’s covenant promises. The Abrahamic covenant (Genesis 12:1–3; 15; 17:7) promised a seed to bless all nations, fulfilled in Christ (Galatians 3:16). The line runs through Isaac and Jacob (Genesis 21; 25), and through Judah, of whom Jacob prophesied, “The scepter shall not depart from Judah… until Shiloh comes” (Genesis 49:10). Tamar (Genesis 38) and the naming of the tribes anchor the line in Genesis. The virgin’s seed recalls the first promise of a seed who would crush the serpent (Genesis 3:15), the protoevangelium fulfilled in the child born of a woman.

Historical Books. Rahab (Joshua 2; 6) and Ruth (the whole book of Ruth) enter the line from the historical books, both Gentiles grafted in by faith. The pivotal figure is David “the king” (1 Samuel 16; 2 Samuel), and above all the Davidic covenant of 2 Samuel 7:12–16, where God promises David an everlasting throne — the covenant that undergirds the title “son of David.” The exile (2 Kings 24–25) and the return under Zerubbabel (Ezra 1–6) mark the two hinges of Matthew’s structure.

Wisdom Literature. The Psalms sing of the Davidic king and the everlasting kingdom (Psalm 2; 89; 110; 132), providing the royal-messianic theology behind “son of David.” Psalm 89 laments the apparent failure of the covenant in exile, a lament answered by the birth of Christ. The wisdom tradition’s confidence that “the LORD establishes his steps” (Proverbs 16:9) undergirds the providence that carried the line through the ages.

Major Prophets. Isaiah supplies the decisive prophecy: “the virgin shall conceive and bear a son” and be called “Immanuel” (Isaiah 7:14; cf. 8:8, 10; 9:6–7). Isaiah 11:1 promises a shoot from the stump of Jesse — the royal line cut down in exile yet sprouting again in Christ. Jeremiah 23:5–6 and 33:14–17 promise a righteous Branch for David; Ezekiel 34:23–24 and 37:24–25 promise “my servant David” as shepherd-king. Micah 5:2 locates the ruler’s birth in Bethlehem (fulfilled in Matthew 2).

Minor Prophets. Haggai renews the Davidic hope in Zerubbabel, God’s chosen “signet ring” (Haggai 2:23), a link in Matthew’s post-exilic line. Zechariah foretells the coming King, humble and righteous (Zechariah 9:9), and the Branch (Zechariah 3:8; 6:12). Malachi, the last prophet before four centuries of silence, promises the coming of the Lord to His temple (Malachi 3:1) — the silence that the birth of Immanuel finally breaks.

---

New Testament Fulfillment

Gospels and Acts. Luke’s genealogy and infancy narrative complement Matthew’s (Luke 1–3). John declares the incarnation the Word made flesh (John 1:1–14). Throughout the Gospels Jesus is hailed as “Son of David” (Matthew 9:27; 21:9; Mark 10:47) and confessed as the Christ (Matthew 16:16). In Acts, Peter and Paul proclaim Jesus as the promised seed of David raised up as Savior (Acts 2:29–36; 13:22–23), and as the one through whom the Abrahamic blessing reaches the nations (Acts 3:25–26).

Paul’s Epistles. Paul teaches that Jesus was “descended from David according to the flesh” and “declared to be the Son of God… by his resurrection” (Romans 1:3–4). He identifies Christ as the singular “offspring” of Abraham in whom the Gentiles are blessed (Galatians 3:16, 29), born “in the fullness of time… of a woman, born under the law, to redeem” (Galatians 4:4–5). The whole gospel of salvation from sin (Romans 3–8) unfolds the meaning of the name Jesus — “he will save his people from their sins.”

General Epistles and Revelation. Hebrews presents Christ as the Son through whom God has spoken in these last days (Hebrews 1:1–2) and celebrates the faith of Rahab (Hebrews 11:31). James too commends Rahab (James 2:25). Revelation names Christ “the Root and the descendant of David, the bright morning star” (Revelation 22:16) and the “Lion of the tribe of Judah, the Root of David” (Revelation 5:5), and portrays the consummation of Immanuel: “Behold, the dwelling place of God is with man” (Revelation 21:3).

---

Redemptive-Historical Context

Matthew 1 gathers up the whole biblical drama of redemption and announces its climax. Creation. The opening phrase, “the book of the genealogy” (biblos geneseōs, v. 1), echoes Genesis and signals a new genesis — the beginning of the new creation in Christ, the last Adam and true image of God (1 Corinthians 15:45; Colossians 1:15). The generations that fill the earth in Genesis now converge upon the one man in whom creation is renewed.

Fall. From Genesis 3, humanity lies under the guilt and power of sin, and the whole genealogy bears the marks of the fall — sin, scandal, exile, and death stalk the line from Judah’s shame to David’s adultery to Babylon’s judgment. Yet the first promise after the fall was of a seed who would crush the serpent (Genesis 3:15), and Matthew traces that seed-line down to the virgin’s son. The great enemy named in verse 21 is precisely the enemy introduced in Eden: sin. Jesus comes “to save his people from their sins,” reversing the catastrophe of the fall.

Redemption. In the “fullness of time” (Galatians 4:4), the promised seed of Abraham and son of David is conceived by the Holy Spirit and born of the virgin Mary. The name Jesus proclaims the accomplishment of redemption — “the LORD saves” — and the whole Gospel will unfold how He saves: by His obedient life, atoning death, and victorious resurrection. The covenant of grace, promised to Abraham and confirmed to David, reaches its substance in Christ, the Mediator of the new covenant, who saves not from earthly enemies but from sin itself. The inclusion of Tamar, Rahab, Ruth, and Bathsheba proclaims that this redemption is by grace, for sinners and outsiders, gathering a people from every nation.

Consummation. The name Immanuel, “God with us” (v. 23), points beyond the incarnation to its final goal. The presence of God begun in the manger, promised in Jesus’ parting words (“I am with you always,” Matthew 28:20), will be consummated when “the dwelling place of God is with man” and “he will dwell with them” forever (Revelation 21:3). Thus Matthew 1 holds the already and the not yet in tension: God has already come to be with us in Christ, yet we await the day when He will dwell with us fully and unveiled. The genealogy that reaches from Abraham to Christ points forward to the genealogy of grace that gathers all the redeemed, from every tribe and tongue, into the family of the King who saves His people from their sins and dwells with them forever.

---

Systematic Theology Connection

The Incarnation (Christology). Matthew 1 is a foundational text for the doctrine of the incarnation. The child conceived by the Holy Spirit in the virgin Mary (vv. 18, 20) is at once truly God — “Immanuel… God with us” (v. 23) — and truly man, taking real human nature from Mary and entering the human family through a genealogy (vv. 1–16). The virgin conception secures both the deity and the humanity of Christ, and His sinlessness, for the eternal Son took our nature without inheriting Adam’s guilt through ordinary generation (Luke 1:35; Hebrews 4:15). The Westminster Confession (8.2) confesses that the Son “did take upon him man’s nature, with all the essential properties and common infirmities thereof, yet without sin; being conceived by the power of the Holy Ghost, in the womb of the Virgin Mary, of her substance,” so that “two whole, perfect, and distinct natures… were inseparably joined together in one person, without conversion, composition, or confusion.” This is the mystery of godliness, “God… manifested in the flesh” (1 Timothy 3:16). Practically, the incarnation assures believers that they have a Mediator who is fully able to represent both God to man and man to God, who sympathizes with our weakness, and who alone could bear our sin. Every comfort of the gospel rests here: the God who came near is with us, and the man Christ Jesus is our brother, our substitute, and our King.

The Covenant of Grace. The genealogy is a visible tracing of the covenant of grace across the ages. From the promise to Abraham (Genesis 12; 17), through the covenant with David (2 Samuel 7), down to its fulfillment in Christ, Matthew shows one unfolding purpose of salvation. The covenant of grace, first announced in Eden (Genesis 3:15) and progressively administered through Abraham, Moses, and David, finds its substance and fulfillment in Jesus Christ, the promised seed (Galatians 3:16). The Westminster Confession (7.3, 7.6) teaches that the covenant of grace was administered differently in the time of the law and now under the gospel, “yet, for the substance, it is one and the same.” The whole genealogy is the record of God keeping this one covenant through many generations, saints and sinners alike. Practically, this assures believers that God’s saving purpose is unshakably faithful, spanning ages and surviving every failure, and that they are heirs of a covenant secured not by their performance but by God’s promise fulfilled in Christ. The believer stands in a line of grace stretching back to Abraham and reaching forward to the consummation, held fast by the covenant-keeping God.

Providence. The genealogy is a monument to the doctrine of providence — God’s sovereign, wise, and holy governing of all His creatures and all their actions toward His appointed ends. Through the free choices of countless people across two thousand years — patriarchs, kings, foreigners, the obscure and the famous, the godly and the wicked — God unerringly carried the messianic line to its goal in Christ (Proverbs 16:9; Ephesians 1:11). The Westminster Confession (5.1) teaches that God “doth uphold, direct, dispose, and govern all creatures, actions, and things, from the greatest even to the least,” yet without being the author of sin and without violating the will of the creature. Even the scandals (Tamar, Bathsheba), the disasters (the exile), and the silent centuries served His purpose. Practically, providence assures believers that no chaos, failure, or delay can defeat God’s plan; He works all things — even sin and calamity — toward the good of His people and the glory of His Son (Romans 8:28). The Christian may therefore rest amid uncertainty, trusting the God who governed the generations to Christ and governs every detail of their lives with the same faithful wisdom.

Election. The advance of the line through Isaac (not Ishmael) and Jacob (not Esau) illustrates the doctrine of sovereign election (v. 2; Romans 9:6–13). The covenant line proceeds not by natural descent, birth order, or human merit, but by God’s free and gracious choice, teaching that salvation rests on God’s electing love (Ephesians 1:4–5). The Westminster Confession (3.5) teaches that God chose His elect in Christ “before the foundation of the world… out of his mere free grace and love, without any foresight of faith or good works.” The inclusion of unlikely people — Gentiles and sinners — magnifies the freeness of this grace, for God chooses “not many wise… not many powerful… but God chose what is foolish in the world” (1 Corinthians 1:26–29). Practically, election humbles all human boasting, for no one contributes to God’s choice; and it comforts the believer, for salvation rests on God’s unchanging purpose rather than on the shifting sands of human faithfulness. The believer’s assurance is grounded in the God who chose His people in Christ before they existed and will surely bring them to glory.

The Person and Work of the Holy Spirit (Pneumatology). The conception of Jesus “from the Holy Spirit” (vv. 18, 20) displays the Spirit’s role in the incarnation and in the whole work of redemption. The same Spirit who hovered over the waters at creation (Genesis 1:2) now brings about the new creation by forming the humanity of Christ in the virgin’s womb, so that the incarnation is the work of the triune God (Luke 1:35). The Spirit’s overshadowing accomplishes what no human power could — the entrance of the eternal Son into our flesh. This anticipates the Spirit’s ongoing work of regeneration, uniting believers to Christ and forming Christ in them (Titus 3:5; Galatians 4:19). The Nicene Creed confesses the Son “was incarnate by the Holy Spirit of the Virgin Mary,” and the Reformed tradition sees the Spirit as the agent of every saving application of Christ’s work. Practically, the believer learns that new life, like the incarnation itself, is not a human achievement but the sovereign work of the Spirit; salvation from first to last is of grace, wrought by the Spirit who formed the humanity of the Savior and now forms the life of Christ in His people.

Salvation Accomplished (Soteriology). The name Jesus — “he will save his people from their sins” (v. 21) — announces the very heart of soteriology. Christ’s saving work addresses sin in its guilt, power, and presence: He saves from the penalty of sin by His atoning death (justification), from the dominion of sin by His Spirit (sanctification), and from the presence of sin in glory (consummation) (Romans 3:24–25; 6:14; 8:30). The Westminster Shorter Catechism (Q. 21) confesses that “the only Redeemer of God’s elect is the Lord Jesus Christ, who… became man, and so was, and continueth to be, God and man in two distinct natures, and one person, forever.” The name defines the mission: not merely to teach, heal, or reform, but to save from sin. Practically, this fixes the believer’s understanding of the gospel: the good news is not self-improvement or moral effort but rescue from sin by a divine Savior. It humbles the sinner (who cannot save himself), exalts the Savior (who alone accomplishes redemption), and directs the soul to rest wholly in Christ’s finished work rather than in any righteousness of its own.

---

Reformed Theology

Matthew 1 stands at the head of the New Testament as a profoundly Reformed and covenantal text, and the Reformed tradition has read it as the grand opening chord of the gospel’s music of grace. At its center lies the conviction that all of redemptive history is one unfolding covenant of grace, promised to Abraham, confirmed to David, and fulfilled in Christ. Geerhardus Vos, the father of Reformed biblical theology, taught that revelation is organic and progressive, unfolding across the ages toward its center in Christ; Matthew’s threefold fourteen generations is a perfect illustration, tracing the single line of promise from Abraham through David and exile to the Messiah. Meredith Kline’s covenantal reading sees the whole Old Testament as anticipating the true King and the true temple, both of whom appear in Matthew 1 — the son of David and Immanuel, “God with us,” God dwelling with His people.

The confessional standards echo throughout the chapter. The Westminster Confession (8.2) confesses the incarnation precisely as Matthew narrates it: the Son “conceived by the power of the Holy Ghost, in the womb of the Virgin Mary, of her substance.” The Confession’s teaching on the covenant of grace (7.3–6) — one covenant differently administered, one and the same in substance — is enacted before our eyes in the genealogy that binds Abraham, David, and Christ into one line of grace. The Shorter Catechism’s confession of Christ as the only Redeemer, “God and man in two distinct natures, and one person, forever” (Q. 21), is the very truth of Immanuel.

Typology and the covenant line. Reformed interpreters delight in the typological richness of the chapter. David the king is a type of the greater King, his throne the shadow of Christ’s everlasting reign (2 Samuel 7; Luke 1:32–33). The exile-and-return pattern prefigures the greater exile of sin and the restoration Christ accomplishes. Rahab and Ruth, Gentiles grafted into Israel, foreshadow the ingathering of the nations into the one people of God — the fulfillment of the Abrahamic promise (Galatians 3:8, 29). Calvin, commenting on the genealogy, marveled that God “was pleased to descend from an unbroken line of ancestors” yet through such flawed people, magnifying His faithfulness. G. K. Beale reads Immanuel as the great temple theme: God, who dwelt with Israel in tabernacle and temple, now dwells with His people in the incarnate Son, the true temple (John 1:14; 2:19–21).

Israel and the Church. In Reformed covenant theology, “his people” (v. 21) whom Jesus saves are the true Israel of God — believing Jews and Gentiles united in Christ, the one olive tree (Romans 11:17–24), the one people of the covenant (Ephesians 2:11–22; Galatians 6:16). The inclusion of Gentile women in the Messiah’s line anticipates this one new humanity. Sinclair Ferguson stresses that the whole chapter is grace from beginning to end — God pursuing a people through the wreckage of human sin. R. C. Sproul underscored that the genealogy is the record of God’s covenant faithfulness, and that the virgin birth secures the God-man who alone can mediate. Spurgeon preached that the line “studded with sinners” proclaims hope for the chief of sinners, since the Savior sprang from such a stock precisely to save such as these. Thus Matthew 1, read through Reformed eyes, is the gospel in miniature: sovereign grace, covenant faithfulness, the incarnate Mediator, and salvation from sin — the whole counsel of God announced in the coming of the child called Jesus, who is Immanuel, God with us.

---

Dispensational Theology

Dispensational theology reads Matthew 1 with characteristic emphases: a literal-grammatical hermeneutic, a firm distinction between Israel and the Church, and an expectation of a future, literal fulfillment of God’s covenant promises to national Israel. For the dispensationalist, the genealogy that opens the New Testament is of the highest importance, for it establishes Jesus’ legal and hereditary right to the throne of David, grounding the future messianic kingdom in a literal, traceable royal descent.

C. I. Scofield’s notes on Matthew stress that the Gospel presents Jesus as “Messiah-King,” the son of David, and that the genealogy proves His title to David’s throne — a throne dispensationalists expect Him to occupy literally in a future millennial kingdom over restored national Israel. Scofield distinguished the legal line of Matthew (through Joseph and Solomon, establishing royal title) from the natural line of Luke (through Mary and Nathan). This distinction resolves the apparent problem of Jechoniah, upon whose line a curse fell (Jeremiah 22:30, “none of his offspring shall succeed in sitting on the throne of David”): since Jesus was not the natural son of Joseph but conceived of the virgin, He inherits the legal right to the throne through Joseph without inheriting the Jechoniah curse through natural descent — the virgin birth being, in this reading, the very means by which God secured a legitimate heir to David’s throne apart from the cursed bloodline.

Charles Ryrie and John Walvoord underscore that the Davidic covenant (2 Samuel 7:12–16) is unconditional and awaits literal fulfillment: God promised David an everlasting throne and kingdom, and dispensationalists insist these promises will be fulfilled to national Israel in a future earthly reign of Christ, not merely “spiritualized” in the Church. J. Dwight Pentecost, in his systematic treatment of eschatology, argues that the messianic kingdom offered in the Gospels is the literal Davidic kingdom, and that Jesus’ descent from David is the necessary credential for that reign. The title “son of David” in Matthew 1:1 thus points forward, in dispensational thought, to the millennial throne.

Progressive dispensationalists such as Craig Blaising and Darrell Bock have modified the older system, allowing that Christ has already been inaugurated as the Davidic King in a preliminary sense at His resurrection and ascension (citing Acts 2:30–36), while still awaiting the consummate, literal reign over Israel in the millennium. Yet across all dispensational streams, the abiding emphases are consistent: the genealogy demonstrates a literal Davidic descent; the virgin birth secures a legal heir untainted by the Jechoniah curse; the title “son of David” anticipates a future, literal kingdom; and God’s covenant promises to Abraham and David will find concrete, historical fulfillment. The name “Jesus… he will save his people from their sins” (v. 21) is affirmed as the Savior’s redemptive mission, and Immanuel (v. 23) as the presence of God in the incarnate King who will one day reign visibly upon the earth. While the Reformed reading sees these promises fulfilled and consummated in Christ and His one covenant people, the dispensational reading holds them in reserve for a future, literal, national fulfillment — a difference of hermeneutic and eschatology, yet a shared confession of the virgin-born Son of David who saves His people from their sins.

---

Bibliography

• The Holy Bible, English Standard Version (ESV). Wheaton: Crossway, 2001.
• Beale, G. K. A New Testament Biblical Theology: The Unfolding of the Old Testament in the New. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2011.
• Beale, G. K. The Temple and the Church’s Mission. Downers Grove: IVP, 2004.
• Blaising, Craig A., and Darrell L. Bock. Progressive Dispensationalism. Wheaton: Bridgepoint, 1993.
• Calvin, John. Commentary on a Harmony of the Evangelists, Matthew, Mark, and Luke. Edinburgh: Calvin Translation Society.
• Calvin, John. Institutes of the Christian Religion. Ed. John T. McNeill. Philadelphia: Westminster, 1960.
• Carson, D. A. Matthew (Expositor’s Bible Commentary). Grand Rapids: Zondervan.
• Ferguson, Sinclair B. The Christian Life: A Doctrinal Introduction. Edinburgh: Banner of Truth.
• France, R. T. The Gospel of Matthew (NICNT). Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2007.
• Henry, Matthew. Commentary on the Whole Bible.
• Hodge, Charles. Systematic Theology. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.
• Kline, Meredith G. Kingdom Prologue. Overland Park: Two Age Press.
• Machen, J. Gresham. The Virgin Birth of Christ. New York: Harper, 1930.
• Pentecost, J. Dwight. Things to Come: A Study in Biblical Eschatology. Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1958.
• Piper, John. The Pleasures of God. Sisters: Multnomah.
• Poole, Matthew. A Commentary on the Holy Bible.
• Ryrie, Charles C. Dispensationalism. Chicago: Moody, 1995.
• Scofield, C. I. The Scofield Reference Bible. New York: Oxford University Press.
• Sproul, R. C. The Gospel of Matthew (St. Andrew’s Expositional Commentary). Wheaton: Crossway.
• Spurgeon, Charles H. The Metropolitan Tabernacle Pulpit. London: Passmore & Alabaster.
• Vos, Geerhardus. Biblical Theology: Old and New Testaments. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.
• Walvoord, John F. Matthew: Thy Kingdom Come. Chicago: Moody, 1974.
• The Westminster Confession of Faith and the Larger and Shorter Catechisms.