The Berean Table

Field	Detail
Pericope	Matthew 19:1–30
Theme	On the road toward Jerusalem, Jesus unfolds the demands and rewards of the kingdom against the grain of the world — He recalls marriage to God’s creation design of one man and one woman joined as one flesh and exposes the hardness of heart behind easy divorce, honors both marriage and the gift of celibacy “for the sake of the kingdom of heaven,” receives and blesses the little children as heirs of the kingdom, confronts the rich young man whose great possessions expose his idolatrous heart, declares how hard it is for the rich to enter the kingdom yet that “with God all things are possible,” and promises that all who have left everything to follow Him will receive a hundredfold and inherit eternal life “in the new world,” when the Son of Man sits on His glorious throne — for many who are first will be last, and the last first

---

Opening Prayer

---

Closing Prayer

---

Timeline Context

Matthew 19 opens the final movement of the Gospel. The formula “Now when Jesus had finished these sayings” (v. 1) is one of Matthew’s five structural markers closing a major block of teaching (cf. 7:28; 11:1; 13:53; 26:1) — here concluding the discourse on the church and forgiveness in chapter 18. With this sentence Jesus “went away from Galilee” for the last time. The Galilean ministry is over; the journey to Jerusalem, the cross, and the resurrection has begun. From here to chapter 20 the road leads southward toward the Holy City, and every episode is colored by the shadow of Calvary.

Geographically, Jesus “entered the region of Judea beyond the Jordan” (v. 1) — the district of Perea, east of the Jordan River, a common route by which Galilean pilgrims traveled to Jerusalem to avoid passing through Samaria. This was territory under the jurisdiction of Herod Antipas, the same tetrarch who had imprisoned and beheaded John the Baptist for condemning Antipas’s own unlawful marriage (14:1–12) — a pointed backdrop for the question about divorce that opens the chapter. The events belong to the final months of Jesus’ public ministry, around A.D. 29–30, under the emperor Tiberius, with Pontius Pilate as prefect of Judea.

The chapter follows the great community discourse of chapter 18 (on humility, the little ones, forgiveness, and church discipline) and leads directly into the parable of the laborers in the vineyard (20:1–16), which expounds the closing maxim “the last will be first, and the first last” (19:30; 20:16), and then into the third passion prediction (20:17–19) and the request of James and John (20:20–28). Thus Matthew 19 is framed on one side by teaching on childlike humility and on the other by teaching on greatness through servanthood — and its own subject matter (marriage, children, riches, reward) all bears on the same theme: entering the kingdom is a matter not of merit, status, or possessions, but of grace received by those who become as little children.

Redemptive-historically, the chapter reaches back to the very beginning. Jesus appeals to creation — “from the beginning” (vv. 4, 8), citing Genesis 1:27 and 2:24 — grounding marriage not in cultural convention or even in the Mosaic law but in God’s original design at creation. He speaks of “the new world” (v. 28, palingenesia, the “regeneration” or renewal of all things), setting the present demands of discipleship within the horizon of the coming consummation, when the Son of Man will sit on His glorious throne. Thus the chapter spans the whole arc of redemptive history, from Eden’s marriage to the renewed creation, with the call to follow the crucified and risen Christ standing at the center.

---

Historical-Grammatical Study

Genre. Matthew is a Gospel — a theological biography presenting Jesus as the promised Messiah, Son of David and Son of God, the fulfillment of the Old Testament. Chapter 19 weaves together controversy dialogue (the divorce question, vv. 3–9), private instruction of the disciples (celibacy, vv. 10–12), a blessing narrative (the children, vv. 13–15), an encounter story (the rich young man, vv. 16–22), and pronouncement sayings on wealth and reward (vv. 23–30). Matthew, writing to a largely Jewish-Christian readership, shows Jesus as the authoritative interpreter of the law who reaches behind Moses to God’s creation intent, and as the King whose kingdom overturns the world’s estimate of the wealthy, the powerful, and the important.

Key grammatical and syntactical features.

• “For any cause” (kata pasan aitian, v. 3). The Pharisees’ question reflects a live rabbinic debate. The school of Shammai held that a man might divorce his wife only for sexual sin; the school of Hillel permitted divorce for “any cause” — even, notoriously, a spoiled dinner. The phrasing frames Jesus’ answer against this dispute.
• “Made them male and female” (arsen kai thēly epoiēsen autous, v. 4). A direct citation of Genesis 1:27 (LXX). Jesus grounds the doctrine of marriage in the created order — the complementary duality of the sexes established by the Creator.
• “The two shall become one flesh” (esontai hoi dyo eis sarka mian, v. 5). From Genesis 2:24 (LXX). The phrase sarx mia (“one flesh”) denotes a real, God-forged union — physical, personal, and covenantal — that constitutes a new kinship bond.
• “Let not man separate” (mē chōrizetō, v. 6). A third-person imperative with negative — a prohibition. Marriage is a divine joining (synezeuxen, “yoked together”), and to sunder it is to defy God’s own act.
• “Hardness of heart” (sklērokardia, v. 8). A Septuagintal term (Deuteronomy 10:16; Jeremiah 4:4) for the stubborn, unteachable heart. The Mosaic permission of divorce (Deuteronomy 24:1–4) was a concession to fallen hardness, not an expression of God’s ideal.
• “Except for sexual immorality” (mē epi porneia, v. 9). The so-called Matthean exception clause. Porneia is a broad term for sexual sin. The clause qualifies Jesus’ otherwise absolute prohibition and has generated a large exegetical literature (see below).
• “Eunuchs… for the sake of the kingdom of heaven” (eunouchoi… dia tēn basileian tōn ouranōn, v. 12). Eunouchos is used both literally and metaphorically. The third category — those who “have made themselves eunuchs” — refers to voluntary celibacy embraced for kingdom service, not to literal self-mutilation.
• “Do not hinder them” (mē kōlyete auta, v. 14). The verb kōlyō (“to prevent, forbid”) later becomes a keyword in discussions of who may be admitted to baptism (Acts 8:36; 10:47; 11:17).
• “To such belongs the kingdom” (tōn… toioutōn estin hē basileia, v. 14). “Of such ones” — not the children only but those characterized by childlike dependence and lowliness (cf. 18:3–4).
• “What good deed must I do” (ti agathon poiēsō, v. 16). The young man’s question is framed in terms of works and merit; Jesus’ reply, “There is only one who is good” (v. 17), redirects to the sole goodness of God.
• “The eye of a needle” (trypēmatos rhaphidos, v. 24). A literal sewing needle. The saying is a deliberate hyperbole (like the camel/gnat of 23:24) picturing the humanly impossible.
• “In the new world” (en tē palingenesia, v. 28). Palingenesia — literally “re-genesis,” “regeneration,” “renewal” — appears only here and in Titus 3:5 in the New Testament. Here it names the cosmic renewal of all things at Christ’s return (cf. Acts 3:21; Romans 8:19–23).

First-century Jewish background. The debate over grounds for divorce between the schools of Hillel and Shammai was a familiar controversy; the Pharisees hoped to entangle Jesus in it, and perhaps to draw from Him a saying dangerous in Antipas’s territory. Certificate of divorce (get) practice derived from Deuteronomy 24:1–4, which the rabbis treated as a divine command; Jesus corrects them — it was a permission, not a command. The rabbis generally esteemed marriage and procreation as duties, which makes Jesus’ commendation of kingdom-celibacy striking. The rich man’s confidence in keeping the law reflects a common Jewish assumption that the commandments could be kept in their external form.

Covenantal themes. Marriage itself is a covenant (Malachi 2:14; Proverbs 2:17), instituted at creation as a one-flesh union that images the covenant faithfulness of God. Jesus reaches behind the Mosaic administration to the creation ordinance, showing the abiding, pre-Mosaic ground of marriage. The Decalogue is cited (vv. 18–19) as the enduring moral law, summed up in love of neighbor (Leviticus 19:18). And the promise of “the new world” (v. 28) frames discipleship within the covenant hope of the renewed creation, the consummation of the covenant of grace.

---

Expanded Outline

Section 1 — The Question About Divorce and God’s Design for Marriage (Matthew 19:1–9)

Key Insight

As Jesus enters Perea on the way to Jerusalem, “Pharisees came up to him and tested him by asking, ‘Is it lawful to divorce one’s wife for any cause?’” (v. 3). The word “tested” (peirazontes) signals hostile intent; they hoped to trap Him between the rival rabbinic schools of Hillel and Shammai, and perhaps to provoke a statement that would offend Herod Antipas, in whose territory John had died for condemning Antipas’s marriage. The phrase “for any cause” places the trap precisely: will Jesus side with lenient Hillel, who permitted divorce for almost anything, or strict Shammai?

Jesus refuses the framework of the debate and reaches back behind Moses to creation itself: “Have you not read that he who created them from the beginning made them male and female, and said, ‘Therefore a man shall leave his father and his mother and hold fast to his wife, and the two shall become one flesh’?” (vv. 4–5). Citing Genesis 1:27 and 2:24, He grounds marriage not in Mosaic legislation or rabbinic tradition but in the Creator’s original design. Marriage is a creation ordinance: God made them male and female and joined them as one flesh from the beginning, before the fall and before the law. His conclusion is emphatic: “So they are no longer two but one flesh. What therefore God has joined together, let not man separate” (v. 6). The union is God’s own act (synezeuxen, “yoked together”); to break it is to defy the God who joined it. Calvin observes that Christ “brings them back to the first institution” and that “the bond… is more sacred than that it should be dissolved at the will of men.”

The Pharisees press their objection: “Why then did Moses command one to give a certificate of divorce and to send her away?” (v. 7). Jesus corrects their reading of Deuteronomy 24: “Because of your hardness of heart Moses allowed you to divorce your wives, but from the beginning it was not so” (v. 8). The Mosaic provision was not a command but a concession to fallen hardness of heart (sklērokardia), regulating an evil rather than endorsing it. Moses did not institute divorce; he restrained its abuses in a hard-hearted people. God’s ideal, unchanged from the beginning, is lifelong, indissoluble union. Then Jesus states His own authoritative ruling: “And I say to you: whoever divorces his wife, except for sexual immorality, and marries another, commits adultery” (v. 9). Against the lax practice of the day, He restores the sanctity of marriage, permitting divorce only where the one-flesh bond has already been ruptured by porneia. Matthew Henry notes that “they that are for putting away their wives upon every dislike abuse Moses’s permission, and use it for a color to their lust.” The Lord who instituted marriage at creation is its rightful Lord and Judge, and He honors the covenant bond that images His own faithfulness to His people (Ephesians 5:31–32).

Application

This passage summons us to receive God’s design for marriage with reverence. First, honor marriage as God’s creation ordinance, not a human contract. Marriage is a divine joining of one man and one woman as one flesh, and what God has joined, no man may lightly sunder (v. 6). Enter it soberly, keep it faithfully, and defend its permanence in an age of casual divorce. Second, beware the hardness of heart that seeks loopholes in God’s law. The Pharisees, like many since, wanted permission for what God forbids; the same hardness lives in every heart that twists Scripture to justify sin. Examine whether you seek God’s will or merely a warrant for your own desires. Third, let the exception clause be a mournful last resort, not an eager escape. Even where porneia has broken the bond, the Bible’s whole tenor favors forgiveness and reconciliation where possible (Hosea; 1 Corinthians 7:10–11). Beware two misapplications: a rigid legalism that would deny any biblical ground for divorce and bind consciences God has not bound, and a lax permissiveness that treats the marriage vow as dissoluble at will. Hold marriage sacred, pursue faithfulness, and let your covenant reflect the covenant-keeping God (Malachi 2:14–16).

---

Section 2 — Eunuchs for the Sake of the Kingdom (Matthew 19:10–12)

Key Insight

The disciples, staggered by the strictness of Jesus’ teaching on marriage, respond, “If such is the case of a man with his wife, it is not expedient to marry” (v. 10). Their reaction betrays the low view of marriage common in a culture of easy divorce: if a man cannot discard a difficult wife, they reason, better not to marry at all. Their conclusion is worldly — they see the permanence of marriage as a burden rather than a blessing — but Jesus uses the moment to teach a further, unexpected truth about singleness in the kingdom.

“Not everyone can receive this saying, but only those to whom it is given” (v. 11). Jesus turns their complaint into an occasion to commend voluntary celibacy for the kingdom’s sake, but He carefully marks it as a gift, not a general rule. Both marriage and celibacy are callings from God; the single life for the kingdom is a divine gift given to some, not a higher spiritual state imposed on all (cf. 1 Corinthians 7:7). He then distinguishes three kinds of “eunuchs”: “there are eunuchs who have been so from birth, and there are eunuchs who have been made eunuchs by men, and there are eunuchs who have made themselves eunuchs for the sake of the kingdom of heaven” (v. 12). The first are those incapable of marriage by nature; the second, those made so by others (a grim reality in the ancient world); the third — the point of the saying — those who freely embrace singleness “for the sake of the kingdom of heaven,” renouncing marriage in order to devote themselves undividedly to Christ’s service.

This third category is figurative, not a call to literal self-mutilation, which Scripture forbids (Deuteronomy 23:1). Kingdom-celibacy is a voluntary consecration of one’s whole life — including one’s sexuality — to the undivided service of Christ and His kingdom. It is exemplified by John the Baptist, by Paul (1 Corinthians 7:7–8, 32–35), and supremely by the Lord Jesus Himself, who lived a celibate life wholly given to His Father’s work. Spurgeon and the Reformers, over against the Roman elevation of compulsory clerical celibacy, insisted that this is a gift given to some, never a law binding all, and never a state inherently holier than marriage. Poole notes that Christ “doth not command, but only commend, a single life to such as have the gift of continency.” Jesus closes with a gentle appeal, not a command: “Let the one who is able to receive this receive it” (v. 12). The kingdom so orders every relationship — marriage and singleness alike — that all is held for Christ, and some are called to forgo even marriage that they may serve Him wholly.

Application

This passage teaches us to hold both marriage and singleness as callings from God. First, do not despise marriage as a burden, as the disciples were tempted to do. Marriage is God’s good gift and creation ordinance; its permanence is a mercy, not a trap. Second, honor singleness for the kingdom as a genuine, God-given calling. The unmarried believer is not a spiritual second-class Christian but may serve Christ with an undivided devotion the married cannot (1 Corinthians 7:32–35). The church should esteem its faithful single members and not treat marriage as the only path to a full Christian life. Third, whether married or single, hold your calling for Christ. The married are to serve Christ in and through marriage; the single, in and through their singleness. Both are to seek first the kingdom. Beware two misapplications: the Roman error of imposing celibacy as a law and treating it as holier than marriage, and the modern error of idolizing marriage as though the unmarried were incomplete. Receive your calling — married or single — from God’s hand, and use it wholly for His kingdom (1 Corinthians 7:17).

---

Section 3 — Jesus Blesses the Little Children (Matthew 19:13–15)

Key Insight

“Then children were brought to him that he might lay his hands on them and pray. The disciples rebuked the people” (v. 13). Parents brought their little ones to Jesus for His blessing — a touching act of faith that the Messiah’s touch and prayer would bring good to their children. But the disciples, thinking such small ones beneath the Master’s time, “rebuked the people.” Perhaps they judged children too insignificant, or feared the interruption of weightier ministry. Their instinct was precisely the world’s instinct, which measures worth by size, strength, and usefulness. The disciples valued the great and dismissed the small; the kingdom of Christ reverses the world’s estimate of importance.

Jesus’ response is decisive and tender: “Let the little children come to me and do not hinder them, for to such belongs the kingdom of heaven” (v. 14). The verb “hinder” (kōlyō) is emphatic — do not stand in their way, do not forbid them. Jesus welcomes the children the disciples would repel. And He gives the reason: “to such belongs the kingdom of heaven.” The kingdom belongs to little children and to all who are like them — the lowly, the dependent, those who receive the kingdom not by achievement but as a gift (cf. 18:3–4, “unless you turn and become like children, you will never enter the kingdom of heaven”). Children have nothing to boast in, nothing to earn salvation with; they simply receive. So must all who would enter. This is not a commendation of childish ignorance but of childlike dependence, humility, and trust. Calvin remarks that Christ “declares that he wishes to receive children,” and that “it would be too cruel to exclude that age from the grace of redemption.” Poole notes that Christ “would not have little children kept from him, nor discouraged from coming to him.”

Then, over against the disciples’ rebuke, “he laid his hands on them and went away” (v. 15). The Reformed tradition has long seen in this scene a warrant for the inclusion of covenant children among God’s people. Christ’s welcome of the little ones and His declaration that the kingdom belongs “to such” undergirds the covenantal place of children in the church and the practice of infant baptism, the sign of the covenant applied to the children of believers (Genesis 17:7; Acts 2:39). Christ does not send the children away to grow up first; He receives them, blesses them, and claims them for His kingdom. Here the Savior who will soon give His life for His people gathers the smallest and weakest into His arms — a living picture of grace that asks nothing but receives all who come.

Application

This passage overturns our worldly sense of worth and shapes how we come to Christ. First, come to Christ as a little child. Salvation is received, not achieved; the kingdom belongs to those who come with the empty hands, humility, and simple trust of a child (18:3). Lay down every claim of merit and self-importance, and receive the kingdom as a gift. Second, do not hinder the little ones — bring them to Christ. Parents, teach, pray for, and bring your children to the Savior who welcomes them; the church, make room for the young, the weak, and the seemingly insignificant, for Christ counts them precious. Third, rest in the covenant grace that embraces our children. The God who welcomed the little ones claims the children of believers within His covenant; raise them in the faith, apply to them the sign of the covenant, and trust the God who says “to such belongs the kingdom.” Beware two misapplications: a presumption that treats covenant privilege as automatic salvation apart from faith, and a neglect that leaves children outside the church’s care until they are grown. Bring them to Christ, and become like them yourself (Mark 10:15).

---

Section 4 — The Rich Young Man (Matthew 19:16–22)

Key Insight

“And behold, a man came up to him, saying, ‘Teacher, what good deed must I do to have eternal life?’” (v. 16). The parallel accounts add that he was young (v. 20), rich (v. 22), and a ruler (Luke 18:18) — outwardly the most promising of inquirers. Yet his very question betrays his heart: “What good deed must I do?” He assumes eternal life is earned by doing, that some meritorious act stands within his power. The young man’s question reveals the great error of the natural heart: that eternal life is a wage to be earned by good works rather than a gift to be received by grace.

Jesus first probes his notion of “good”: “Why do you ask me about what is good? There is only one who is good. If you would enter life, keep the commandments” (v. 17). Jesus is not denying His own goodness or deity; He is pressing the young man to consider what “good” truly means — that God alone is the standard of goodness, and that measured against Him, no human “good deed” suffices. Then, meeting the man on his own ground of law-keeping, Jesus points him to the commandments. “Which ones?” the man asks, and Jesus recites the second table of the Decalogue — murder, adultery, theft, false witness, honoring parents — summed up in “You shall love your neighbor as yourself” (vv. 18–19; Leviticus 19:18). Jesus holds up the moral law as a mirror, that the young man might see himself and be driven from self-righteousness to grace (Romans 3:20; Galatians 3:24).

But the man does not see: “All these I have kept. What do I still lack?” (v. 20). His confident claim exposes his shallow understanding of the law, which reaches to the heart’s motives (5:21–48). Yet he senses a lack. So Jesus applies the law to the one point where this man’s idol reigns: “If you would be perfect, go, sell what you possess and give to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven; and come, follow me” (v. 21). Jesus exposes the young man’s true god: he had kept the outward letter, but his heart clung to wealth, breaking the very first commandment — for his money was his idol. The command to sell all is not a universal rule for every believer but a probe that lays bare this man’s divided heart and false claim to have loved God and neighbor supremely. The test is whether he will have Christ or his riches. “When the young man heard this he went away sorrowful, for he had great possessions” (v. 22). He would not part with his wealth even for eternal life; his possessions possessed him. He came seeking eternal life and went away sorrowful, for he loved his riches more than the Savior who alone could give it. Calvin observes that Christ “tears off the mask” of the man’s self-confidence; Ryle notes that “his money was his idol… and he would not give it up.” Here is the tragedy of the almost-Christian: near the kingdom, yet turning away because the price is a rival god.

Application

This passage searches every heart for its true treasure. First, abandon the delusion that eternal life can be earned. No good deed can purchase eternal life, for God alone is good and His law only condemns the self-righteous; life is received by grace through faith in Christ (Romans 3:20; 6:23). Come not asking “what must I do?” but pleading “God, be merciful to me, a sinner.” Second, let the law expose your idols. The young man’s wealth was his god; yours may be money, comfort, reputation, or relationship. Whatever you would not surrender for Christ is your idol and your master (Matthew 6:24). Ask what “one thing” you lack — what rival god you clutch. Third, be willing to leave all and follow Christ. He may not call every believer to sell all, but He calls every believer to hold all loosely and follow Him supremely. Beware two misapplications: a legalism that turns “sell all” into a universal command for salvation by poverty, and a complacency that assumes I have no idol because I am not conspicuously rich. Do not go away sorrowful; let Christ have the throne your idols have usurped, and follow Him (Philippians 3:8).

---

Section 5 — The Danger of Riches and Salvation by God’s Power (Matthew 19:23–26)

Key Insight

The rich man’s departure prompts a solemn teaching: “Truly, I say to you, only with difficulty will a rich person enter the kingdom of heaven. Again I tell you, it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for a rich person to enter the kingdom of God” (vv. 23–24). Jesus states a hard truth: riches are a grave spiritual danger. Not because wealth is sin in itself, but because it so easily becomes an idol, a false security, a rival to God, and a soil in which pride and self-sufficiency flourish. Wealth is spiritually perilous, for it tempts the heart to trust in riches rather than God and to find its treasure on earth (1 Timothy 6:9–10, 17; Mark 10:24, “how difficult it is… for those who trust in riches”).

The image of “a camel through the eye of a needle” is a deliberate, vivid hyperbole — the largest animal in Palestine and the smallest of openings. Attempts to soften it (a small “needle gate” in the city wall, or reading “cable” for “camel”) miss the point: Jesus means the humanly impossible. For the rich to enter the kingdom is, humanly speaking, not merely hard but impossible — as impossible as threading a camel through a needle’s eye. The disciples grasp the force of it: “When the disciples heard this, they were greatly astonished, saying, ‘Who then can be saved?’” (v. 25). Their astonishment reflects the common assumption that wealth was a mark of God’s favor; if the rich, so blessed, can scarcely be saved, what hope is there for anyone? Their question is better than they knew, for it exposes the truth that no one, rich or poor, can save himself.

Jesus’ answer is the theological heart of the passage: “But Jesus looked at them and said, ‘With man this is impossible, but with God all things are possible’” (v. 26). Salvation is impossible for man — for rich and poor alike, by nature no one can enter the kingdom — but it is possible with God, for what human effort cannot achieve, sovereign grace accomplishes. This is the gospel in a sentence. The camel cannot thread the needle; but God can do what is impossible with men. The rich young man could not save himself, nor can any sinner; salvation is the work of God, who by His almighty grace regenerates the dead, softens the hard heart, loosens the grip of idols, and gives what man can never earn. Spurgeon exults that “salvation is of the Lord… the impossible with men is the possible with God.” Calvin writes that “though the salvation of men be impossible, yet the grace of God will surmount this difficulty.” Here the doctrines of total inability and sovereign grace shine: no one — least of all the self-sufficient rich — can save himself, but God saves whom He will. The passage that begins with the impossibility of self-salvation ends with the omnipotence of divine grace: with God all things are possible.

Application

This passage exposes the danger of wealth and magnifies the power of grace. First, beware the peril of riches. Wealth tempts the heart to trust in itself and to treasure earth over heaven; the rich must watch their souls with special vigilance (1 Timothy 6:17; Luke 12:15–21). If God has given you much, hold it as a steward, guard against its idolatry, and lay up treasure in heaven. Second, despair of saving yourself, and cast yourself on God. No sinner, rich or poor, can enter the kingdom by his own power; salvation is impossible with man and possible only with God (John 6:44; Ephesians 2:1–5). Stop trusting your goodness, your effort, or your resources, and plead the almighty grace that alone can save. Third, rest and rejoice in the God with whom all things are possible. The same power that raised Christ can save the hardest heart, break the strongest idol, and convert the most unlikely sinner; pray boldly for those who seem beyond hope. Beware two misapplications: a false asceticism that condemns all wealth as sin, and a presumption that treats the danger of riches lightly. Trust not in uncertain riches but in the living God, and marvel that with Him all things — even your salvation — are possible (1 Timothy 6:17).

---

Section 6 — The Reward of Those Who Follow Christ (Matthew 19:27–30)

Key Insight

Peter, ever the spokesman, seizes on the contrast with the rich young man who would not leave his possessions: “See, we have left everything and followed you. What then will we have?” (v. 27). Unlike the man who went away sorrowful, the Twelve had abandoned nets, tax-booth, homes, and livelihoods to follow Jesus. Peter’s question is honest, if not yet purified of self-interest: what shall be our reward? Jesus does not rebuke the question but answers it with a lavish promise. Christ does not despise the desire for reward but purifies and satisfies it, promising that no sacrifice made for His sake will go unrewarded.

“Truly, I say to you, in the new world, when the Son of Man will sit on his glorious throne, you who have followed me will also sit on twelve thrones, judging the twelve tribes of Israel” (v. 28). The phrase “in the new world” translates palingenesia — the “regeneration,” the renewal of all things at Christ’s coming (cf. Acts 3:21; Romans 8:19–23; Revelation 21:1–5). The reward is set in the new creation, when the Son of Man reigns in glory and His faithful followers share His royal authority. To the Twelve is promised a place of honor “judging the twelve tribes of Israel” — sharing in Christ’s kingly rule over the renewed people of God, the true Israel gathered from all nations (Revelation 20:4; 1 Corinthians 6:2–3). The Son of Man who now travels the road to the cross will one day sit “on his glorious throne,” fulfilling Daniel 7:13–14.

The promise then widens beyond the apostles to every disciple: “And everyone who has left houses or brothers or sisters or father or mother or children or lands, for my name’s sake, will receive a hundredfold and will inherit eternal life” (v. 29). Every sacrifice made “for my name’s sake” is repaid a hundredfold and crowned with the inheritance of eternal life. The “hundredfold” (which Mark 10:30 specifies is “now in this time,” with persecutions, and “in the age to come eternal life”) includes the rich fellowship of the family of God — a new family of brothers, sisters, mothers, and homes in the church — as well as the eternal inheritance. What the disciple surrenders for Christ is not lost but exchanged for something incomparably greater. Calvin notes that Christ “promises a reward… not as if it were due to their merits, but of his free grace.” The reward is of grace, not wages; the surrender itself is grace, and so is the recompense.

Finally, a word of caution guards against pride and presumption: “But many who are first will be last, and the last first” (v. 30). The kingdom overturns human calculations of rank and reward: those who reckon themselves first may be last, and the lowly last may be first (cf. 20:1–16). This proverb, which frames the parable of the laborers that follows (20:16), warns Peter and every disciple against a mercenary, comparative spirit. The reward is sure, but it is reckoned by grace, not by human bookkeeping, and God delights to exalt the humble and abase the proud. Christ, who Himself became last of all — the crucified Servant — will be exalted first of all, and His people follow Him from cross to crown.

Application

This passage frees us to follow Christ at all cost, in hope of His sure reward. First, count no sacrifice for Christ a loss. Whatever you leave for Christ’s sake — home, family, security, comfort — is not lost but exchanged for a hundredfold now and eternal life to come (v. 29; Philippians 3:8). Follow Him with open hands, trusting His generous recompense. Second, fix your hope on the “new world” and the coming reward. Live now in view of the day when the Son of Man sits on His glorious throne and His people share His reign; let that hope steady you through present loss and persecution (Romans 8:18). Third, serve without a mercenary, comparing spirit. The warning “many who are first will be last” guards against pride, envy, and spiritual bookkeeping; serve Christ from love, content to be last, and trust His grace to reward. Beware two misapplications: a mercenary religion that follows Christ merely for what it can get, and a false humility that despises the reward Christ Himself offers. Follow the Savior who became last of all, leave what He asks, and rest in the hundredfold grace that crowns every sacrifice made for His name (Hebrews 11:26).

---

Cross References

Comparative Gospel Study

Matthew 19 is Gospel narrative, and its material has close parallels in Mark 10:1–31 and Luke 18:15–30, allowing a rich harmonization.

The divorce question (19:1–9; Mark 10:1–12). Matthew and Mark both record the Pharisees’ test, Jesus’ appeal to Genesis 1:27 and 2:24, and His teaching on the Mosaic concession. Mark frames the Pharisees’ question more simply (“Is it lawful for a man to divorce his wife?”) and gives Jesus’ private instruction to the disciples afterward, adding the striking words that a woman who divorces her husband and remarries also commits adultery (Mark 10:11–12) — protecting wives as well as husbands. Matthew alone includes the “except for sexual immorality” clause (19:9; cf. 5:32) and the subsequent teaching on celibacy (19:10–12), reflecting his fuller treatment of the law for a Jewish-Christian readership. Luke omits this episode here but records a compressed divorce saying elsewhere (Luke 16:18).

The little children (19:13–15; Mark 10:13–16; Luke 18:15–17). All three Synoptics place the blessing of the children immediately after the divorce teaching (in Mark and Luke) and record Jesus’ welcome and rebuke of the disciples. Mark and Luke preserve the sharper saying, “Whoever does not receive the kingdom of God like a child shall not enter it” (Mark 10:15; Luke 18:17), and Mark adds the tender detail that Jesus “took them in his arms and blessed them, laying his hands on them” (Mark 10:16) — the fullest picture of Christ’s affection for the little ones.

The rich young man (19:16–22; Mark 10:17–22; Luke 18:18–23). The three accounts are strikingly harmonious. Mark alone notes that the man “ran and knelt” (Mark 10:17) and, movingly, that “Jesus, looking at him, loved him” (Mark 10:21) — the compassion beneath the searching command. Luke identifies him as “a ruler” (Luke 18:18). Matthew’s phrasing of Jesus’ reply (“Why do you ask me about what is good? There is only one who is good”) differs slightly from Mark and Luke (“Why do you call me good? No one is good except God alone”), but the sense is one: Jesus presses the man to reckon with the goodness of God.

Riches and reward (19:23–30; Mark 10:23–31; Luke 18:24–30). All three record the camel and needle, the disciples’ astonishment, and the great word “With man it is impossible, but not with God; for all things are possible with God” (Mark 10:27). Mark and Luke specify that the hundredfold is received “now in this time” as well as “in the age to come eternal life” (Mark 10:30; Luke 18:30), clarifying the temporal and eternal dimensions of the reward. Matthew alone preserves the promise of the twelve thrones “in the new world” (19:28), a distinctly Matthean emphasis on the eschatological kingdom. The harmonized picture is a seamless, mutually enriching testimony to the same events.

Old Testament Connections

Pentateuch. The foundational texts are Genesis 1:27 (“male and female he created them”) and Genesis 2:24 (“Therefore a man shall leave his father and his mother and hold fast to his wife, and they shall become one flesh”), both quoted by Jesus to ground marriage in creation. Deuteronomy 24:1–4 provides the certificate-of-divorce regulation Jesus reinterprets as a concession to hardness of heart. The Decalogue (Exodus 20:12–16; Deuteronomy 5:16–20) supplies the commandments Jesus recites to the rich young man. Leviticus 19:18 (“You shall love your neighbor as yourself”) sums up the second table. Genesis 17:7 (“to be God to you and to your offspring after you”) undergirds the covenantal inclusion of children.

Historical Books. The Davidic covenant (2 Samuel 7:12–16) stands behind the messianic kingship implied in the Son of Man on His glorious throne.

Wisdom Literature. Psalm 131 models the weaned-child humility Jesus commends. Proverbs 30:8–9 and Ecclesiastes 5:10 warn of the spiritual danger of riches. Psalm 73 wrestles with the prosperity of the wicked, correcting the assumption that wealth signals favor.

Major Prophets. Daniel 7:13–14 supplies “the Son of Man” who receives an everlasting kingdom, fulfilled in the glorious throne of 19:28. Isaiah 65:17 and 66:22 promise “new heavens and a new earth,” the palingenesia of the renewed creation.

Minor Prophets. Malachi 2:14–16 declares that God hates divorce and that marriage is a covenant, directly echoed in Jesus’ teaching. Hosea 1–3 portrays God’s covenant faithfulness to an unfaithful spouse, the backdrop for marriage as covenant.

New Testament Fulfillment

Gospels and Acts. The parallels in Mark 10 and Luke 18 (above). Acts 3:21 speaks of “the time for restoring all the things,” echoing the palingenesia. Acts 2:39 applies the covenant promise “to you and to your children.”

Paul’s Epistles. Ephesians 5:31–32 cites Genesis 2:24 and reveals marriage as a “profound mystery” imaging Christ and the church. 1 Corinthians 7 develops Jesus’ teaching on marriage, divorce, and the gift of singleness, including the “Pauline privilege” (7:15) and the honor of celibacy for undivided devotion (7:32–35). 1 Timothy 6:9–10, 17–19 expounds the danger of riches and the right use of wealth. Romans 8:17–23 unfolds the inheritance of the children of God and the coming renewal of creation. Philippians 3:7–8 models counting all things loss for Christ.

General Epistles and Revelation. 1 Timothy 4:1–3 warns against forbidding marriage, correcting the abuse of celibacy. Hebrews 13:4 exhorts, “Let marriage be held in honor among all.” Revelation 20:4 shows the saints seated on thrones and reigning with Christ; Revelation 21:1–5 portrays the new heaven and new earth, the consummation of the palingenesia; and Revelation 21:12–14 joins the twelve tribes and twelve apostles in the architecture of the New Jerusalem.

Redemptive-Historical Context

Matthew 19 spans the whole arc of redemptive history, from creation to consummation. At creation, God instituted marriage: He “made them male and female” and joined them as “one flesh” (Genesis 1:27; 2:24). This creation ordinance, established before the fall, images the faithful, covenantal love that God would later reveal as the pattern of His own dealings with His people. Marriage is thus woven into the fabric of the created order, a permanent institution grounded not in culture but in the Creator’s design.

The fall introduced the “hardness of heart” (19:8) that corrupts marriage as it corrupts all things. Divorce, polygamy, adultery, and the exploitation of the vulnerable are all fruit of sin’s disorder. The Mosaic permission of divorce (Deuteronomy 24) was a merciful accommodation to fallen hardness, restraining an evil God did not endorse. So too the idolatry of riches, which turned the rich young man from the kingdom, is a symptom of the fall — the heart’s exchange of the Creator for the creature, treasuring gold above God (Romans 1:25). And the disciples’ dismissal of the little children, and Peter’s mercenary calculation of reward, reveal the pride and self-interest that sin has bred in every heart.

In the fullness of time comes redemption in Christ. Jesus, the second Adam, restores God’s creation design for marriage, reaching behind Moses to Eden. He welcomes the little ones and declares that the kingdom is received, not earned — grace, not merit. He exposes the idolatry of the rich and declares that what is impossible with man is possible with God, for He Himself has come to do the impossible: to save sinners who cannot save themselves. He who “though he was rich, yet for your sake he became poor, so that you by his poverty might become rich” (2 Corinthians 8:9) leaves all — the riches of glory — to seek and save the lost. On the road to Jerusalem, He walks toward the cross where sovereign grace will accomplish salvation. The camel cannot thread the needle, but the Lamb of God can bear away the sin of the world.

The chapter’s horizon reaches to the consummation: “the new world” (palingenesia), when “the Son of Man will sit on his glorious throne” (19:28). Here the already/not-yet tension of the kingdom is displayed. Already, in Christ’s first coming, the kingdom has broken in; the little ones are welcomed, sinners are saved, disciples leave all to follow. Not yet is the kingdom consummated: that awaits the renewal of all things, when Christ reigns in glory, His people share His throne, and every sacrifice is repaid a hundredfold in the inheritance of eternal life (Romans 8:18–23; Revelation 21:1–5). Thus the chapter holds together Eden’s marriage and the marriage supper of the Lamb, the first creation and the new creation, the present cross and the coming crown. And at its center stands Christ — the one who is good, the Savior of the impossible, who calls us to leave all and follow Him from the road to Jerusalem to the glory of the new world.

---

Systematic Theology Connection

Marriage as a Creation Ordinance and Covenant. Jesus grounds marriage in creation — “from the beginning” God “made them male and female” and joined them “one flesh” (19:4–6; Genesis 1:27; 2:24). Marriage is a divine institution, a creation ordinance predating the fall and the Mosaic law, and a covenant that binds one man and one woman for life (Malachi 2:14; Proverbs 2:17). The Westminster Confession (24.1–2) teaches that “marriage is to be between one man and one woman,” ordained “for the mutual help of husband and wife, for the increase of mankind… and of the church… and for preventing of uncleanness.” Because God joins the couple, marriage is not dissoluble at human will (24.6). Practically, this dignifies marriage as sacred, calls spouses to lifelong faithfulness, and grounds the church’s defense of marriage against every cultural distortion. Cross-references: Ephesians 5:22–33; Hebrews 13:4; 1 Corinthians 7:1–16.

The Moral Law and Its Uses. Jesus recites the second table of the Decalogue to the rich young man (19:18–19) and holds it up as a mirror. The moral law, summarized in the Ten Commandments and in love of God and neighbor, remains binding as the abiding rule of righteousness, and its first use is to convict of sin and drive the sinner to Christ (Romans 3:20; Galatians 3:24). The Westminster Confession (19) distinguishes the moral law (perpetually binding) from the ceremonial and judicial (fulfilled or expired), and (19.6) names the law’s uses — to reveal sin, restrain evil, and guide the believer. Jesus uses the law’s pedagogical function to expose the young man’s self-righteousness. Practically, this teaches us to preach the law to convict and the gospel to save, and to use the law as our rule of gratitude, never as a ladder of merit. Cross-references: Romans 7:7; 1 Timothy 1:8–11; Psalm 119.

Total Depravity and Human Inability. “With man this is impossible” (19:26) — no sinner, rich or poor, can enter the kingdom by his own power. Fallen man is spiritually dead, morally unable, and hostile to God, so that salvation is impossible by human effort and must be wholly the work of God (Romans 8:7–8; Ephesians 2:1–5; John 6:44). The rich young man’s failure and the disciples’ despairing “Who then can be saved?” dramatize this inability. The Westminster Confession (9.3) confesses that fallen man “is not able, by his own strength, to convert himself.” Practically, this humbles all self-reliance, silences boasting, and casts the sinner entirely on grace. Cross-references: Jeremiah 13:23; Romans 3:10–12; 1 Corinthians 2:14.

Salvation by Sovereign Grace. “But with God all things are possible” (19:26). What is impossible for man, God accomplishes by His almighty, sovereign grace, saving whom He will by regenerating the dead and drawing sinners to Christ (John 6:37, 44; Ephesians 2:4–9; Titus 3:5). The whole passage moves from the impossibility of self-salvation to the omnipotence of divine grace. The Westminster Confession (10) teaches effectual calling, in which God “enlightening their minds… renewing their wills… doth… effectually draw them to Jesus Christ.” Practically, this fills the believer with humble gratitude and bold hope, for the God who does the impossible can save the hardest heart. Cross-references: Romans 9:16; Philippians 1:6; 1 Corinthians 15:10.

Effectual Calling and Regeneration. The word palingenesia (“regeneration,” 19:28) names the cosmic renewal, but the same grace that renews the cosmos renews the individual heart (Titus 3:5). God effectually calls and regenerates His people, making the dead alive and the unwilling willing, so that they leave all and follow Christ (John 3:3–8; Ezekiel 36:26–27; Ephesians 2:5). The disciples who “left everything” (19:27) did so by grace; their surrender was the fruit of God’s prior work. The Westminster Confession (10.1) describes the effectual call by which God takes away the heart of stone and gives a heart of flesh. Practically, this assures the believer that his very faith and obedience are gifts, and directs all glory to God. Cross-references: John 1:12–13; 1 Peter 1:3; Colossians 2:13.

Rewards, Perseverance, and the Believer’s Inheritance. Christ promises a hundredfold reward and the inheritance of eternal life to all who leave all for His name (19:28–29). God graciously rewards the good works of His people — not as wages earned, but as an inheritance freely bestowed — and preserves them to the end that they may receive it (Luke 17:10; 1 Corinthians 3:14; Romans 8:17). The Westminster Confession (16.5–6) teaches that believers’ works cannot merit anything, yet are accepted and rewarded in Christ; and (17) that the elect persevere and are kept by God’s power unto salvation. Practically, this motivates faithful, sacrificial service in hope of God’s reward, while guarding against a mercenary spirit and grounding assurance in God’s preserving grace. Cross-references: Hebrews 11:26; 2 Timothy 4:8; 1 Peter 1:4–5.

The Covenantal Place of Children. “To such belongs the kingdom of heaven” (19:14). The children of believers are included within the covenant of grace and its visible community, and are to be brought to Christ, nurtured in the faith, and marked with the sign of the covenant (Genesis 17:7; Acts 2:39; 1 Corinthians 7:14). Christ’s welcome of the little ones confirms their place among His people. The Westminster Confession (25.2) includes “the children of believers” in the visible church, and the Directory for Worship grounds infant baptism in the continuity of the covenant. Practically, this shapes Christian parenting, catechesis, and the church’s care for its youngest, in the hope that God works savingly through covenant nurture. Cross-references: Genesis 17:7–14; Colossians 2:11–12; Deuteronomy 6:6–7.

---

Reformed Theology

Matthew 19 is a treasury of Reformed conviction, above all in its doctrine of marriage and its doctrine of grace. On marriage and divorce, the Reformed tradition takes its stand precisely where Jesus does — on the creation ordinance. Marriage is not a human invention or a mutable social contract, but a divine institution established at creation, “one man and one woman” joined as “one flesh” by God Himself (Genesis 1:27; 2:24). The Westminster Confession of Faith devotes an entire chapter (24, “Of Marriage and Divorce”) to this subject. It affirms that “marriage is to be between one man and one woman” (24.1), that it was ordained “for the mutual help of husband and wife, for the increase of mankind with a legitimate issue, and of the church with an holy seed; and for preventing of uncleanness” (24.2). Following Christ’s own teaching, the Confession recognizes only two grounds for the dissolution of the marriage bond: “adultery or fornication… after the marriage” (24.5), and “such willful desertion as can no way be remedied” (24.6, drawing on 1 Corinthians 7:15). Even then, divorce is a concession to the innocent, not a license for the hard-hearted, and “a public and orderly course of proceeding is to be observed” (24.6). The Reformers, reacting against both the medieval Roman treatment of marriage as a quasi-sacrament administered by the church and the loose divorce practices of their day, sought to honor marriage as sacred while allowing the innocent party biblical relief. Calvin, in Geneva, both defended the permanence of marriage and provided for the wronged spouse, exactly the balance Christ strikes in 19:9.

On the danger of riches and the necessity of grace, the chapter is a locus classicus for the Reformed doctrines of grace. The rich young man illustrates total depravity and human inability — outwardly moral, yet inwardly enslaved to an idol, unable to save himself or even to see his true condition. Jesus’ words “With man this is impossible, but with God all things are possible” (19:26) express the whole Reformed soteriology in miniature. Calvin comments that “though the salvation of men be impossible, yet the grace of God will surmount this difficulty,” and that salvation is entirely “the work of God.” The disciples’ despairing “Who then can be saved?” is answered not by pointing to human capacity but to divine omnipotence. This is monergism: God alone accomplishes what man cannot. The doctrines of unconditional election, effectual calling, and irresistible grace all find their root here — the God with whom all things are possible sovereignly saves the dead. Spurgeon preached that “salvation is of the Lord from first to last,” and this text is his proof.

On the covenant, Jesus’ welcome of the little children (19:14) grounds the Reformed conviction that the children of believers belong to the covenant community. Vos and the covenant theologians see the seamless continuity of the covenant of grace from Abraham’s “you and your offspring” (Genesis 17:7) through Peter’s “the promise is for you and for your children” (Acts 2:39) to Christ’s “to such belongs the kingdom of heaven.” The sign of the covenant, once circumcision, is now baptism, applied to believers and their children (Colossians 2:11–12). On reward and grace, the Reformed tradition, following Calvin, insists that the hundredfold reward (19:29) is “of his free grace” and not of merit — God graciously crowning the works His own grace produced (Westminster Confession 16.5–6). And on the eschatology of the “new world” (palingenesia, 19:28), Reformed theologians such as Vos, Bavinck, and Hoekema see the renewal of the whole creation under Christ’s reign, the consummation of the kingdom in the new heavens and new earth (Isaiah 65:17; Revelation 21:1–5). Ferguson and Sproul alike stress that the chapter’s whole thrust is the sovereignty and sufficiency of grace: salvation, sacrifice, and reward are all of God, from first to last, so that no flesh may boast, and Christ receives all the glory.

---

Dispensational Theology

Dispensational theology, employing a consistently literal-grammatical hermeneutic and maintaining a clear distinction between Israel and the church, reads Matthew 19 with particular attention to two features: the promise of the twelve thrones (19:28) and the language of “the regeneration” (palingenesia).

On marriage and divorce (19:1–12), Dispensationalists agree with the broad Christian and Reformed reading: Jesus grounds marriage in the creation order (Genesis 1:27; 2:24), corrects the abuse of the Mosaic permission, and permits divorce only for sexual immorality. Ryrie and Walvoord note that Jesus here addresses the Hillel-Shammai debate and upholds the permanence of marriage as God’s design, while the exception clause recognizes the reality of a broken covenant. Dispensational writers, like the Reformed, honor the celibate calling as a gift for undivided kingdom service (19:11–12), citing Paul’s parallel teaching (1 Corinthians 7).

On the rich young man and riches (19:16–26), Dispensationalists read the passage as exposing the impossibility of earning eternal life by law-keeping and the necessity of grace. Scofield’s notes emphasize that the young man’s question “what good deed must I do?” reveals the legal spirit, and that Jesus uses the law to bring conviction, since “the law was never given as a means of salvation.” The command to sell all is understood as a test exposing the man’s idolatry, not a universal condition of discipleship. “With God all things are possible” (19:26) is taken as affirming that salvation is God’s work of grace.

The passage of greatest distinctive Dispensational interest is 19:28: “in the regeneration [palingenesia], when the Son of Man will sit on his glorious throne, you who have followed me will also sit on twelve thrones, judging the twelve tribes of Israel.” Where Reformed theology reads this as the renewal of all creation and the reign of Christ with His people (the church as the true Israel), classical Dispensationalism reads “the regeneration” as referring specifically to the future millennial kingdom — the literal, earthly, thousand-year reign of Christ following His second advent (Revelation 20:1–6). Pentecost, in Things to Come, treats this as a key text for the millennial kingdom, in which Christ sits on the throne of David and the restored nation of Israel is regathered and blessed. The “twelve thrones… judging the twelve tribes of Israel” are read literally: the twelve apostles will exercise governmental authority over the twelve literal tribes of national Israel in the millennial kingdom. Walvoord argues that this promise cannot be spiritualized into the church’s rule but points to Israel’s national restoration, when the apostles administer Christ’s earthly reign over regathered Israel (cf. Ezekiel 37; Zechariah 14; Isaiah 11). Scofield similarly ties “the regeneration” to the messianic kingdom, when creation itself is delivered and Israel restored to covenant blessing.

Thus the Dispensational reading distinguishes God’s program for Israel (the twelve tribes ruled by the twelve apostles in the millennial kingdom) from His program for the church, resisting the identification of the twelve tribes with the church. The hundredfold reward and the inheritance of eternal life (19:29) are affirmed as promises to all who follow Christ, while the throne-promise of 19:28 is understood in terms of the future kingdom administration. Chafer and Ryrie insist that the literal fulfillment of these promises awaits the second coming and the establishment of the earthly kingdom, in which the Old Testament covenant promises to Israel are fulfilled to the letter. Where the Reformed reading sees one people of God renewed in the new creation, the Dispensational reading sees a distinct, future, national Israel ruled by the apostles in the millennial reign of Christ — the two traditions differing chiefly on the identity of “the twelve tribes” and the nature of “the regeneration,” while agreeing that the passage exalts the sovereignty of grace and the sure reward of those who follow the King.

---

Bibliography

• Bavinck, Herman. Reformed Dogmatics. 4 vols. Baker Academic.
• Beale, G. K. A New Testament Biblical Theology: The Unfolding of the Old Testament in the New. Baker Academic.
• Calvin, John. Commentary on a Harmony of the Evangelists, Matthew, Mark, and Luke. Calvin Translation Society.
• Calvin, John. Institutes of the Christian Religion. Ed. John T. McNeill.
• Carson, D. A. Matthew (The Expositor’s Bible Commentary). Zondervan.
• Chafer, Lewis Sperry. Systematic Theology. Dallas Seminary Press.
• Ferguson, Sinclair B. The Whole Christ. Crossway.
• Henry, Matthew. Commentary on the Whole Bible.
• Hoekema, Anthony A. The Bible and the Future. Eerdmans.
• Kline, Meredith G. Kingdom Prologue. Two Age Press.
• Pentecost, J. Dwight. Things to Come: A Study in Biblical Eschatology. Zondervan.
• Piper, John. Desiring God. Multnomah.
• Poole, Matthew. A Commentary on the Holy Bible.
• Ryle, J. C. Expository Thoughts on the Gospels: Matthew.
• Ryrie, Charles C. Dispensationalism. Moody Press.
• Scofield, C. I., ed. The Scofield Reference Bible. Oxford University Press.
• Sproul, R. C. Matthew (St. Andrew’s Expositional Commentary). Crossway.
• Spurgeon, Charles H. The Metropolitan Tabernacle Pulpit. Passmore & Alabaster.
• Vos, Geerhardus. Biblical Theology: Old and New Testaments. Eerdmans.
• Walvoord, John F. Matthew: Thy Kingdom Come. Moody Press.
• Warfield, B. B. The Works of Benjamin B. Warfield. Baker.
• The Westminster Confession of Faith and The Westminster Larger and Shorter Catechisms.