Companion: Summary Handout
On this page
- Opening Prayer
- Closing Prayer
- Timeline Context
- Historical-Grammatical Study
- Expanded Outline
- Section 1 — Servants of Christ Jesus (Philippians 1:1a)
- Key Insight
- Application
- Section 2 — To All the Saints in Christ Jesus at Philippi (Philippians 1:1b)
- Key Insight
- Application
- Section 3 — With the Overseers and Deacons (Philippians 1:1c)
- Key Insight
- Application
- Section 4 — Grace to You and Peace (Philippians 1:2)
- Key Insight
- Application
- Cross References
- Comparative Gospel Study
- Old Testament Connections
- New Testament Fulfillment
- Redemptive-Historical Context
- Systematic Theology Connection
- Union with Christ
- Effectual Calling and Sanctification
- The Nature and Government of the Church
- The Trinity and the Deity of Christ
- The Covenant of Grace
- Reformed Theology
- Dispensational Theology
- Bibliography
Passage: Philippians 1:1–2. Read the full text in your Bible or a Bible app as you work through this study.
Opening Prayer
Our Father in heaven, we come to You in the name of Your Son, the Lord Jesus Christ, and by the help of Your Holy Spirit. You have spoken to Your church through Your servant Paul, and we ask that You would speak to us now through the first words of his letter to the Philippians. Open the eyes of our hearts, for apart from Your Spirit we cannot see the glory of Christ in the Scriptures. Show us what it means to be servants of Christ Jesus, to be saints in Him, to be gathered under the care of those You have appointed, and to live from Your grace and in Your peace. Convict us where we have thought little of the church You purchased with the blood of Your Son. Comfort us with the assurance that we belong to You in Christ, and that nothing can remove us from Him. Transform us, that our lives in this present city would bear witness that our citizenship is in heaven. We ask this for the glory of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. Amen.
Closing Prayer
Gracious Father, we thank You for the truth You have shown us in these two verses. You have told us who we are: servants of Christ Jesus, saints set apart in Him, members of one body under shepherds You have given, recipients of grace and peace that come from You and from Your Son. We confess that we have often wanted to be masters rather than servants, that we have treated Your church as a convenience rather than a household, and that we have sought peace in circumstances rather than in Christ. Forgive us for His sake. We thank You for the Lord Jesus, who took the form of a servant and made peace by the blood of His cross, so that we who were far off might be brought near. Give us grace now to apply what we have learned: to serve gladly where You have placed us, to honor and pray for the overseers and deacons of our congregation, to pursue unity with every saint, and to carry Your peace into a restless world. Keep us in Christ Jesus until the day of His appearing. Amen.
Timeline Context
The letter and its author. Philippians is a letter from the apostle Paul, written with Timothy at his side, to a congregation he had founded about a decade earlier. Paul writes as a prisoner (Philippians 1:7, 13–14, 17). The traditional and majority view places that imprisonment in Rome around AD 60–62, the two-year house arrest with which the book of Acts closes (Acts 28:16, 30–31). Two details in the letter fit that setting well: Paul’s witness has become known “throughout the whole imperial guard” (Philippians 1:13), the praetorium, and he sends greetings from “those of Caesar’s household” (Philippians 4:22). Some scholars have proposed an earlier imprisonment in Ephesus (about AD 54–55) or the Caesarean imprisonment of Acts 23–26 (AD 57–59), chiefly because of the distance between Rome and Philippi and the several journeys the letter presupposes. Nothing in the study of the greeting turns on the question; the Roman setting under Nero, in the years before the great persecution of AD 64, remains the most natural reading.
The immediate occasion was a gift. The Philippians had sent money to Paul by the hand of Epaphroditus, one of their own members, who had fallen gravely ill in Paul’s company and was now being sent home (Philippians 2:25–30; 4:10–20). Paul writes to thank the church, to reassure them about Epaphroditus, to report on his own circumstances, to prepare them for Timothy’s visit (Philippians 2:19–24), and to address two matters of concern: a strain in the church’s unity, which surfaces most plainly in the appeal to Euodia and Syntyche (Philippians 4:2–3), and the threat of false teachers who put confidence in the flesh (Philippians 3:2–3, 18–19). The letter’s shape is simple. After the greeting (Philippians 1:1–2) come thanksgiving and prayer (Philippians 1:3–11); Paul’s report from prison (Philippians 1:12–26); a sustained call to live worthy of the gospel in unity and humility, at whose center stands the great hymn of Christ’s self-emptying and exaltation (Philippians 1:27–2:18); the travel plans for Timothy and Epaphroditus (Philippians 2:19–30); warning and Paul’s own example (Philippians 3:1–4:1); final exhortations to unity, joy, and peace (Philippians 4:2–9); thanks for the gift (Philippians 4:10–20); and the closing greetings (Philippians 4:21–23). The earliest witness to the letter outside the New Testament is Polycarp of Smyrna, who wrote to the same church early in the second century and reminded them that Paul, “when absent,” had written to them; the letter is preserved in the Chester Beatty papyrus P46 from about AD 200.
The city. Philippi lay in eastern Macedonia, about ten miles inland from its port at Neapolis, on the Via Egnatia, the great Roman road that ran from the Adriatic coast to Byzantium. Philip II of Macedon, the father of Alexander the Great, had seized and refounded the town in 356 BC and given it his own name, drawing on the gold of nearby Mount Pangaion. Its decisive moment came in 42 BC, when Mark Antony and Octavian defeated Brutus and Cassius, the assassins of Julius Caesar, on the plain outside the city. The victors settled veterans there, and after Octavian’s later victory over Antony at Actium (31 BC) the city was refounded as Colonia Iulia Augusta Philippensis. As a Roman colony it enjoyed the ius Italicum: its land was treated as Italian soil, its citizens held Roman citizenship, its inscriptions were in Latin, and its government copied Rome’s in miniature. Luke’s description is exact: “a leading city of the district of Macedonia and a Roman colony” (Acts 16:12). Philippi was a city proud of its Roman identity and its emperor, and that pride is the backdrop for the letter’s language of citizenship (Philippians 1:27; 3:20) and its confession that “Jesus Christ is Lord” (Philippians 2:11).
The founding of the church. Paul came to Philippi on his second missionary journey, about AD 49–50, after the vision of the man of Macedonia at Troas (Acts 16:9–10). With him were Silas, the young Timothy, who had joined the party at Lystra only shortly before (Acts 16:1–3), and Luke, whose “we” narrative begins at this point (Acts 16:10). The city had no synagogue, so the missionaries went on the Sabbath to a place of prayer beside the river Gangites (Acts 16:13). There the Lord opened the heart of Lydia, a Gentile God-fearer and dealer in purple cloth from Thyatira, and she and her household were baptized (Acts 16:14–15). The deliverance of a slave girl from a spirit of divination cost her owners their income, and Paul and Silas were beaten and jailed; the earthquake, the conversion of the jailer and his household, and the magistrates’ embarrassment at having flogged Roman citizens complete the account (Acts 16:16–40). The first European church was thus gathered from a merchant woman, a slave, and a jailer, with the households of two of them. From that first day the Philippians became Paul’s partners in the gospel, sending him help more than once in Thessalonica and again in Corinth, when no other church did (Philippians 1:5; 4:15–16; 2 Corinthians 11:9), and joining generously in the collection for Jerusalem out of “extreme poverty” (2 Corinthians 8:1–5). Paul visited them again on his third journey (Acts 20:1–6).
Where the pericope falls. Philippians 1:1–2 is the letter’s prescript: the first sentence a first-century reader would see, and the only part of the letter that follows a fixed public form. Nothing precedes it. What follows immediately is the thanksgiving (Philippians 1:3–11), in which Paul gives thanks for the Philippians’ partnership, expresses his confidence that “he who began a good work in you will bring it to completion at the day of Jesus Christ” (Philippians 1:6), and prays that their love may abound in knowledge and discernment. The greeting is therefore the threshold of the letter, and it functions as an overture. Every one of its phrases will be taken up again. “Servants” will return in the form of a servant that Christ took (Philippians 2:7). “All” will be repeated again and again, because the unity of the whole church is the letter’s burden (Philippians 1:4, 7, 8, 25; 2:17; 4:21). “Saints in Christ Jesus who are at Philippi” will become the citizens whose commonwealth is in heaven (Philippians 3:20). The “overseers and deacons” will be needed when Paul asks his “true companion” to help the two quarreling women (Philippians 4:3). “Grace” will close the letter as it opened it (Philippians 4:23), and “peace” will reappear as “the peace of God, which surpasses all understanding” (Philippians 4:7) and as the presence of “the God of peace” (Philippians 4:9). A pericope study of the greeting is therefore not a study of a formality. It is a study of the letter’s whole vocabulary in seed.
Redemptive-historical placement. The greeting stands at a particular moment in the history of redemption. The gospel has crossed from Asia into Europe; the Spirit poured out at Pentecost has gathered Gentiles in a Roman colony into the people once confined to Israel; the “saints” who were “the saints of the Most High” in Daniel’s vision (Daniel 7:18) are now a Gentile congregation on the Via Egnatia. Christ has been exalted and given “the name that is above every name” (Philippians 2:9), and in a city that hailed Caesar as lord and savior, a church greets one another in the name of a different Lord. The apostle who brings them grace and peace is himself in chains, an emblem of the already and the not yet: the kingdom has come in Christ, and its servants still suffer as they wait for the Savior from heaven (Philippians 3:20–21).
Historical-Grammatical Study
Genre. The pericope is an epistolary prescript, the opening formula of a Greco-Roman letter. Such letters began with three elements: the sender (in the nominative), the recipient (in the dative), and a greeting, usually the single word chairein, “greetings.” The New Testament preserves the bare form in the letter of the Jerusalem council (Acts 15:23) and in James (James 1:1). Paul takes the form and fills it. The sender is described, the recipients are described, and the one-word greeting becomes a two-part blessing with a stated source. The book as a whole is a letter, but of a particular kind. It shares features with the ancient “letter of friendship” and the “family letter,” in which the writer reports on his circumstances, expresses affection, and thanks the recipients for a gift, and it also carries sustained exhortation. Philippians is a personal, pastoral letter to friends, written under the authority of an apostle, and the warmth of the greeting sets that tone.
Syntax and key terms. The greeting is verbless, as prescripts were; the reader supplies “write” or “wish.” Paulos kai Timotheos douloi Christou Iēsou places both names under one plural noun: servants, douloi. The word means slaves, persons owned by a master; the ESV renders it “servants” and refers the reader to its preface, where the translators explain their rendering of doulos as “servant,” “bondservant,” or “slave” according to context. Paul uses the title of himself in Romans 1:1 and Titus 1:1, of Epaphras in Colossians 4:12, and of all believers in 1 Corinthians 7:22. In the Septuagint doulos renders the Hebrew ‘ebed in the title “servant of the LORD” borne by Moses, Joshua, David, and the prophets, and by the Servant of Isaiah 42–53. The word order “Christ Jesus” (Christou Iēsou), used twice in v. 1, sets the title before the name, “the Messiah, Jesus,” while v. 2 has the more common “Jesus Christ.”
The recipients are pasin tois hagiois en Christō Iēsou tois ousin en Philippois. “All” (pasin) is emphatic by position and is the first of the letter’s many “alls.” “Saints” (hagioi) is Paul’s ordinary term for believers; it is plural, a people, and it translates the Septuagint’s word for Israel as a holy nation (Exodus 19:6) and for the “saints of the Most High” (Daniel 7:18, 22, 27). “In Christ Jesus” (en Christō Iēsou) is locative: it names the sphere in which they are saints, and the letter will use “in Christ,” “in the Lord,” and “in him” some twenty times. The participle “who are” (tois ousin) introduces a second location, “at Philippi.” The saints are in Christ and in Philippi at once. The prepositional phrase “with the overseers and deacons” (syn episkopois kai diakonois) has no article and no verb; the officers are included within “all the saints,” joined to them by syn, “together with,” not set over against them. Episkopos, “overseer,” was a common Greek word for an official who supervised a group, its funds, or its work; in the New Testament it is interchangeable with presbyteros, “elder,” as Acts 20:17 and 28, Titus 1:5 and 7, and 1 Peter 5:1–2 show. Diakonos, “servant” or “minister,” here names an office, as in 1 Timothy 3:8–13. A few later manuscripts and some patristic writers read synepiskopois, “fellow-overseers,” which would make Paul and Timothy colleagues of the Philippian elders; the reading is secondary, but it shows that early readers already sensed the modesty of the greeting. The plural episkopois in a single city is grammatically unremarkable and theologically weighty: one congregation, several overseers.
The blessing, charis hymin kai eirēnē apo theou patros hēmōn kai kyriou Iēsou Christou, replaces the Greek chairein with its near-homonym “grace” (charis) and adds the Hebrew greeting shalom in its Greek form, “peace” (eirēnē). The two nouns share one verb (to be supplied) and one preposition. “From” (apo) governs both “God our Father” and “the Lord Jesus Christ” together; the Father and the Son are one source of the blessing. “Lord” (kyrios) is the word the Septuagint uses for the divine name; in Philippi it was also the word for Caesar.
First-century background. Two social realities stand behind the greeting. The first is slavery. Slaves were everywhere in a Roman colony, and slaves of the emperor’s household (familia Caesaris) held positions of real trust and influence; to be “servants of Christ Jesus” in such a city was to claim a Master higher than Caesar and to accept the humility of the slave’s condition. The second is civic organization. Philippi was full of voluntary associations, trade guilds, and cult societies with their own officers, and episkopos was a title in use for such officials. Paul’s readers would have recognized the word; what they would not have expected is that the association it names is the holy people of the God of Israel gathered around a crucified Jew. The Jewish background is equally important. “Saints,” “servant of the LORD,” and “peace” are covenant words, and Paul’s fusion of the Greek and Hebrew greetings into “grace and peace” is itself a picture of the church at Philippi: Jew and Gentile, Lydia of Thyatira and a Roman jailer, one people.
Covenantal themes. The greeting is covenantal at every point. God calls a people and names them holy, as He did Israel at Sinai (Exodus 19:5–6). He gives them servants to speak His word, as He gave Moses and the prophets. He orders them under overseers and deacons, as Israel was ordered under elders and Levites. He blesses them with grace and peace, the substance of the Aaronic benediction: “the LORD be gracious to you … and give you peace” (Numbers 6:24–26). And He does all of this “in Christ Jesus,” the mediator of the new covenant, in whom the promise “I will be their God, and they shall be my people” (Jeremiah 31:33) is fulfilled for a congregation in Macedonia.
Expanded Outline
Section 1 — Servants of Christ Jesus (Philippians 1:1a)
Key Insight
The letter opens with two names and a single title. Paul and Timothy stand together, yet Paul does not call himself an apostle, as he does in most of his letters. He and Timothy are simply “servants of Christ Jesus” (v. 1). The Greek word is douloi, which in the first century meant slaves, persons owned rather than merely employed. Paul and Timothy belong to Christ; they have been “bought with a price” (1 Corinthians 6:20), and their lives are not their own.
Three reasons for the title suggest themselves. First, Paul writes to a church that never questioned his authority, and the affection of the whole letter makes an apostolic claim unnecessary; the Philippians were his partners “from the first day until now” (Philippians 1:5). Calvin observes that the title marks these men as ministers of the gospel who belong wholly to Christ, and that Paul had no need to assert his office before a church that had never doubted it. Second, the title places Paul and Timothy side by side. Timothy had been with Paul when the church was founded (Acts 16:1–3) and would soon be sent to them again (Philippians 2:19–24); the co-sender is presented not as a subordinate but as a fellow slave of the same Master. Third, and most important, the title anticipates the heart of the letter. In Philippians 2:7 Paul will write that Christ “emptied himself, by taking the form of a servant,” morphēn doulou, the very word used here. Before Paul asks the Philippians to have the mind of Christ, he shows them two men who bear Christ’s own title. Sinclair Ferguson notes that the humility Paul will urge in chapter 2 is already modeled in the way he introduces himself in chapter 1.
The phrase also carries the weight of the Old Testament. “Servant of the LORD” was the title of Moses (Deuteronomy 34:5), Joshua (Joshua 24:29), David (Psalm 89:3), and the prophets (Amos 3:7). Above all it was the title of the One whom Isaiah foresaw: “Behold, my servant shall act wisely” (Isaiah 52:13), the Servant who would bear the sin of many. To be a doulos Christou Iēsou is therefore no mark of shame. It is to stand in the line of those whom God has taken into His own service, and to belong to the Servant Himself. Spurgeon delighted in the title and counted it a higher honor than any the world could bestow. The Master became a slave so that His slaves might become sons (Galatians 4:4–7; John 15:15), and yet the sons never cease to be glad servants.
The Christological focus, then, is plain. The letter begins with Christ’s name twice in one verse and with two men defined entirely by their relation to Him. Everything that follows flows from this first confession: we are His. The reader who would understand Philippians must begin by asking whose servant he is.
Application
The first application is a question of ownership. The world teaches us to think of ourselves as self-made and self-owned, and Christians absorb this more than they know. Paul’s self-description corrects it at the root. To be a Christian is to have a Master, and the Christian’s daily question is not “What do I want?” but “What does my Lord require?” This shapes vocation: the believer who serves Christ can wash dishes, teach children, run a business, or preach a sermon as one whose work is done “as for the Lord and not for men” (Colossians 3:23). It shapes ministry: those who lead in the church must lead as servants, for “whoever would be great among you must be your servant” (Matthew 20:26). Paul and Timothy stood before a church they had founded and claimed no title but slave.
The second application concerns partnership. Paul names Timothy alongside himself, sharing his letter and his title with a younger man. Mature believers should ask whom they are bringing alongside them, whose name they are willing to set beside their own, and whether they are training servants of Christ or merely gathering assistants. Timothy did not become the man of Philippians 2:20, who genuinely cared for the churches, by accident; he became so by years at Paul’s side.
The third application is comfort. If Christ owns us, He is responsible for us. A slave in the ancient world looked to his master for food, protection, and direction, and Christ is a Master who “will bring it to completion” (Philippians 1:6) in those He has bought.
A warning against misapplication: the title “servant of Christ” must not be turned into a license for domineering in Christ’s name, as though being His slave made one everyone else’s master. Paul’s servanthood expressed itself in a refusal to lord it over the faith of others (2 Corinthians 1:24). Nor should the language of slavery be used to crush Christian freedom or to justify human bondage; the slave of Christ is thereby “a freedman of the Lord” (1 Corinthians 7:22), owned by no one else.
Application Question 1: In what areas of my life do I still act as my own master rather than as a servant of Christ Jesus?
Answer: Paul and Timothy define themselves at the outset as “servants of Christ Jesus” (v. 1), and the title governs everything they do. Honest self-examination usually finds particular rooms of the house that have not been handed over: how we spend money, how we use time and screens, whom we choose as friends, what we say when we are angry, or what ambitions we quietly cherish. The servant of Christ has no private domain; “you are not your own, for you were bought with a price” (1 Corinthians 6:19–20). The remedy is not resolve alone but surrender: to name the area, confess it, and present it to Christ “as a living sacrifice” (Romans 12:1). Christ’s ownership is not a burden but a rescue, for the alternative master is sin, whose wages are death (Romans 6:16–23).
Why is this question important? Divided ownership produces divided living. The Christian who reserves one area from Christ’s lordship will find that area becoming the seat of anxiety and the door of temptation. Whole-hearted servanthood is the path to the joy that pervades this letter.
Application Question 2: Whom am I bringing alongside me in Christ’s service, as Paul brought Timothy?
Answer: Paul did not write “Paul, a servant” but “Paul and Timothy, servants” (v. 1). He shared his letter, his title, and his ministry with a younger man whom he had taken up at Lystra (Acts 16:1–3) and trained for a decade. Every believer has someone younger in the faith who could be drawn alongside: a child, a new convert, a younger colleague, a member of the congregation. Discipleship is the deliberate sharing of one’s walk with Christ so that another may “follow me, as I follow Christ” (1 Corinthians 11:1). This requires time, patience, and a willingness to let another share the credit. Paul’s reward was a man of whom he could say, “I have no one like him” (Philippians 2:20). The church is built by servants who reproduce servants, and “what you have heard from me … entrust to faithful men, who will be able to teach others also” (2 Timothy 2:2).
Why is this question important? A faith that is not passed on dies with its holder. The Lord’s servants are commanded to multiply, and the neglect of this duty leaves congregations without leaders and families without heirs of the gospel.
Deep Study Question 1: Why does Paul call himself a servant rather than an apostle here, and what does that choice teach about apostolic authority?
Answer: Paul’s letters vary their self-designation with their purpose. Where his authority was contested, as in Galatia and Corinth, he asserted his apostleship at once (Galatians 1:1; 1 Corinthians 1:1). To Philippi, a church bound to him in affection and partnership (Philippians 1:5, 7), he writes as a servant, and he includes Timothy, who was not an apostle, under the same title (v. 1). Apostolic authority was real but never self-serving; it was “for building you up and not for destroying you” (2 Corinthians 10:8). The choice also fits the letter’s message. Paul will call the church to the humility of Christ, who “emptied himself, by taking the form of a servant” (Philippians 2:7), and he begins by taking that form himself. Authority in the church is exercised most fully when it is worn most lightly. The apostle who could command chooses to entreat (Philemon 8–9), because “we proclaim … Jesus Christ as Lord, with ourselves as your servants for Jesus’ sake” (2 Corinthians 4:5).
Why is this question important? Christians must understand that the authority of Scripture rests on Christ, not on the status of His messengers, and that church leaders who model Paul’s servanthood are more, not less, faithful to their office.
Deep Study Question 2: How does the Old Testament title “servant of the LORD” illuminate Paul’s title “servant of Christ Jesus”?
Answer: In the Old Testament “servant of the LORD” was a title of honor given to those whom God took into His confidence and sent on His errands: Abraham (Genesis 26:24), Moses (Deuteronomy 34:5), Joshua (Joshua 24:29), David (2 Samuel 7:5), and the prophets, to whom He revealed His secret (Amos 3:7). The line culminates in Isaiah’s Servant, chosen and upheld by God (Isaiah 42:1), who would be “a light for the nations” (Isaiah 49:6) and would justify many by bearing their iniquities (Isaiah 53:11). Jesus is that Servant, as the Gospels repeatedly affirm (Matthew 12:17–21). When Paul calls himself “servant of Christ Jesus” he does two remarkable things. He places Christ in the position that the LORD occupied in the old covenant, a quiet confession of Christ’s deity, and he places himself in the line of Moses and the prophets, a servant sent with a word. Yet he is servant of the Servant: every Christian’s service is a share in the service of Jesus, who “came not to be served but to serve” (Mark 10:45).
Why is this question important? Reading the New Testament with Old Testament ears prevents us from hearing “servant” as a demeaning word and shows the unity of God’s saving purpose across both covenants.
Section 2 — To All the Saints in Christ Jesus at Philippi (Philippians 1:1b)
Key Insight
Paul now names his readers, and every word of the address is chosen. He writes “to all the saints in Christ Jesus who are at Philippi” (v. 1). The first word, “all” (pasin), might seem a formality, but it is not. Philippians is the letter of “all.” Paul prays for them “all” (Philippians 1:4), holds them “all” in his heart (Philippians 1:7), yearns for them “all” (Philippians 1:8), and greets “every saint” at the close (Philippians 4:21). Gordon Fee sees in this insistence a pastoral purpose: a church in which two prominent women could not agree (Philippians 4:2) and in which “selfish ambition or conceit” was a live danger (Philippians 2:3) needed to hear, from the first line, that the apostle’s love and the Lord’s grace excluded no one. There are no second-class members among the saints at Philippi.
The second word is “saints” (hagioi), holy ones. The word does not mean a spiritual elite. Every believer at Philippi, Lydia and the jailer and the former slave girl alike, is a saint, not because of attainment but because of calling. He uses the same word for the troubled Corinthians, “sanctified in Christ Jesus, called to be saints” (1 Corinthians 1:2). R. C. Sproul liked to point out that the word means “set apart”: the saints are those whom God has separated for Himself. The Old Testament is the key. Israel was told, “you shall be to me a kingdom of priests and a holy nation” (Exodus 19:6), and Daniel saw “the saints of the Most High” receive the kingdom (Daniel 7:18). Now that holy people has been gathered in a Roman colony, and Gentiles bear the title once reserved for Israel. Holiness, in this sense, is first a status conferred and then a life required: “you were washed, you were sanctified, you were justified” (1 Corinthians 6:11), and therefore “be holy in all your conduct” (1 Peter 1:15).
The third phrase is “in Christ Jesus”, and it is the ground of the other two. The saints are holy because they are in Christ; they are one because they are in Christ. Matthew Henry remarks that believers are saints only by virtue of their union with Him, and that outside of Christ there is no holiness. The phrase names a union so real that the believer has died and been raised with Christ (Romans 6:3–5). Philippians will make heavy use of this language: encouragement is “in Christ” (Philippians 2:1), righteousness is found “in him” (Philippians 3:9), joy and peace and strength are “in the Lord” (Philippians 4:4, 7, 13).
Then comes the fourth phrase, “who are at Philippi.” The saints have two addresses. They are in Christ and they are in Philippi, in heaven’s sphere and on Rome’s soil. Philippi was a little Rome planted on foreign soil; the church, Paul will say, is a colony of heaven whose “citizenship is in heaven” (Philippians 3:20). The Christian lives in his city, but he does not take his identity from it.
Application
The first application is to see fellow believers as God sees them. The person beside you in the pew, however ordinary or difficult, is a saint, set apart by God and united to Christ. Paul’s “all” forbids the quiet ranking that goes on in every congregation, in which the gifted, the wealthy, or the long-standing members count for more. If God has made no distinction in the calling, we may make none in the fellowship (James 2:1–4). Practically, this means learning the names of those we tend to overlook, seeking out the member who is drifting, and refusing to let a personal dispute, like that of Euodia and Syntyche, divide what Christ has joined.
The second application is to take our holiness seriously because it is already ours. Many Christians labor to become what they are afraid they are not. Paul reverses the order. You are saints; therefore live as saints. Sanctification is the outworking of a status, not the earning of one. The believer who grasps this pursues holiness with confidence rather than dread, “for it is God who works in you” (Philippians 2:13).
The third application concerns our two addresses. We are to live fully in our city, working, voting, serving, loving our neighbors, and yet to draw our identity, values, and hope from Christ. The Philippian Christians did not leave Philippi; they lived there as citizens of heaven. So must we, in whatever city God has placed us (Jeremiah 29:7).
A warning against misapplication: the doctrine that all believers are saints must not become an excuse for indifference to holiness of life, as though status made conduct irrelevant. Paul’s next words to these saints will be a prayer that they be “pure and blameless for the day of Christ” (Philippians 1:10). Nor should “in Christ” be spiritualized into detachment from the local church; the saints Paul addresses are the concrete congregation at Philippi, with its officers and its quarrels, not an invisible ideal.
Application Question 1: Do I regard every member of my congregation as a saint in Christ, or have I quietly ranked some believers above others?
Answer: Paul addresses “all the saints” (v. 1) without distinction, and the letter’s repeated “all” is a deliberate rebuke to partiality. The New Testament forbids showing favor to the rich or the impressive in the assembly (James 2:1–4) and insists that “the parts of the body that seem to be weaker are indispensable” (1 Corinthians 12:22). Every believer is a saint by God’s calling, not by our estimate. Self-examination should ask whose company we seek after worship, whose absence we notice, whose opinion we weigh, and whom we would be embarrassed to be seen with. The measure of a congregation’s love is its treatment of its least impressive member, for Christ said, “as you did it to one of the least of these my brothers, you did it to me” (Matthew 25:40).
Why is this question important? Partiality fractures the unity Paul labors for throughout Philippians. Where saints are ranked, the church becomes a club; where they are honored equally, the world sees the mind of Christ.
Application Question 2: How does knowing that I am already a saint in Christ change the way I pursue holiness?
Answer: Paul does not tell the Philippians to become saints; he tells them they are saints “in Christ Jesus” (v. 1). Holiness begins as a gift: believers “were washed … sanctified … justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ” (1 Corinthians 6:11). The Christian pursues holiness from acceptance, not for acceptance. This changes the spirit of the pursuit. Fear gives way to gratitude, and the drive to prove oneself gives way to the desire to be what one already is. It also changes the method: since holiness is “in Christ,” it grows by communion with Him, through His word, prayer, and the fellowship of His people, and not by self-improvement. Sanctification is God’s work in which we labor, “for it is God who works in you, both to will and to work” (Philippians 2:13). The believer who knows himself set apart will not want to give himself back to what he was rescued from.
Why is this question important? Many Christians live under a low-grade sense of failure because they have reversed the gospel order. Status precedes conduct in Scripture, and only that order produces holiness that lasts.
Deep Study Question 1: What does it mean that the saints are “in Christ Jesus,” and why is union with Christ the foundation of every other blessing in the letter?
Answer: “In Christ” is Paul’s most characteristic phrase, and here it names the sphere in which the Philippians are saints (v. 1). The believer has been joined to Christ so that what is true of Christ becomes true of him: he has died with Christ, been buried and raised with Him (Romans 6:3–5), and is seated with Him in the heavenly places (Ephesians 2:6). Union with Christ is the root; every other benefit is a branch. Justification comes by being “found in him” (Philippians 3:9); sanctification is being made like Him (Philippians 3:10); glorification is His transforming our lowly bodies to be like His glorious body (Philippians 3:21). The letter’s encouragement, comfort, joy, peace, and strength are all located “in Christ” or “in the Lord” (Philippians 2:1; 4:4, 7, 13). Nothing is given to the believer apart from the Christ to whom he is joined, which is why the letter’s supreme aim is to “gain Christ” (Philippians 3:8).
Why is this question important? Union with Christ guards against treating salvation as a set of detached gifts. We receive Christ Himself, and in Him everything; this keeps the gospel personal and Christ-centered rather than transactional.
Deep Study Question 2: How does Paul’s use of “saints” for a Gentile congregation relate to Israel’s calling as a holy nation?
Answer: At Sinai the LORD said to Israel, “you shall be my treasured possession among all peoples … a kingdom of priests and a holy nation” (Exodus 19:5–6), and Israel’s holiness consisted in being set apart to God by covenant. The prophets looked forward to the day when “the saints of the Most High” would receive an everlasting kingdom (Daniel 7:18, 27) and when the nations would be joined to the LORD (Isaiah 56:6–7). Paul’s address to a Gentile congregation as “saints” (v. 1) declares that day to have come. The church is not a replacement for Israel but the continuation of God’s one holy people, into which believing Gentiles are grafted (Romans 11:17) and made “fellow citizens with the saints and members of the household of God” (Ephesians 2:19). The privileges of Israel are now the privileges of all who are in Christ, the true seed of Abraham (Galatians 3:29). Peter says it plainly to Gentile believers: “you are a chosen race, a royal priesthood, a holy nation” (1 Peter 2:9). Holiness has always been a gift of covenant, and the covenant is now in Christ.
Why is this question important? It settles the identity of the church. Believers read the Old Testament as their own family history, and its promises of holiness, kingdom, and peace as promises made to them in Christ.
Section 3 — With the Overseers and Deacons (Philippians 1:1c)
Key Insight
Paul adds a phrase found in no other salutation he wrote: “with the overseers and deacons” (v. 1). It is the earliest clear reference in Paul’s letters to the two standing offices of the local church.
Three observations govern its meaning. First, the officers are named with the saints, not above them. The preposition syn joins them to “all the saints”; they are members of the congregation who bear a particular responsibility within it, not a separate order over it. Matthew Henry observes that Paul addresses the ministers as well as the people, and the people as well as the ministers, because the whole church, officers included, stands in need of the same grace and peace. Second, the overseers are plural. One city church had several episkopoi. Chrysostom already noticed this, and concluded that Paul must mean the presbyters, since the titles were then shared. J. B. Lightfoot’s conclusion has become the common property of New Testament scholarship: in the New Testament the same officer is called indifferently “overseer” and “elder.” Acts 20 makes this explicit, for Paul summons the “elders” of Ephesus (Acts 20:17) and tells them that the Holy Spirit has made them “overseers” (Acts 20:28); Titus 1:5 and 7 and 1 Peter 5:1–2 do the same. Calvin drew the necessary conclusion: Scripture uses bishop, presbyter, and pastor as synonyms, and the government of a congregation belongs to a plurality of such men. The Reformed session of elders rests on this phrase. Third, the deacons are named alongside the overseers as a distinct office. Their qualifications are given in 1 Timothy 3:8–13, and their prototype is usually found in the seven appointed to care for the Jerusalem widows so that the apostles could give themselves “to prayer and to the ministry of the word” (Acts 6:2–4). Word and care, oversight and service, are the church’s two hands.
Why does Paul mention the officers here, in this letter alone? The most likely reasons are practical. The gift he is about to acknowledge (Philippians 4:10–20) would have been gathered and sent under their direction; and the division he is about to address (Philippians 4:2–3) would have to be healed under their care. The officers are named because they will be needed.
The Christological point is the deepest. Both titles belong first to Christ. He is “the Shepherd and Overseer (episkopos) of your souls” (1 Peter 2:25), the chief Shepherd under whom every elder serves (1 Peter 5:4). And He “became a servant (diakonos) to the circumcised” (Romans 15:8), the One who “came not to be served but to serve” (Mark 10:45) and who washed His disciples’ feet (John 13:14). Overseers and deacons are not the church’s rulers and functionaries; they are men in whom the congregation is meant to see the oversight and the service of Jesus. Their offices are the shape of His care for His people, extended through the ordinary means of ordained men.
Application
The first application is to value the ordered church. Many Christians today prize the church’s fellowship but sit lightly to its structure, as though offices were an institutional afterthought. Paul greets the overseers and deacons in the same breath as the saints. The Lord who saves a people also orders them, and the ordinary way He shepherds and serves His flock is through the men He calls to those offices. To belong to a congregation with faithful elders and deacons is a gift of Christ’s care, and it should be received as such: with attendance, with submission “as those who will have to give an account” (Hebrews 13:17), and with regular prayer for those who bear the weight.
The second application is to hold the offices to their biblical shape. Overseers are shepherds and teachers, not executives; deacons are servants of the needy, not a junior board. A congregation should ask whether its elders actually know and visit the flock, whether its deacons actually reach the widow, the sick, and the poor, and whether men are chosen for these offices by the qualifications of 1 Timothy 3 rather than by prominence or wealth.
The third application is to men in the church. Paul writes that “if anyone aspires to the office of overseer, he desires a noble task” (1 Timothy 3:1). Godly men should consider whether the Lord is calling them to serve His church in office, and congregations should be raising up such men deliberately, as Paul raised up Timothy.
A warning against misapplication: the plurality of overseers must not be turned into a warrant for clerical pride in either direction, whether by elevating officers into a ruling class remote from the saints or by despising office altogether in the name of every-member ministry. Paul’s syn forbids both. Nor should this verse be used to settle every detail of church polity; it establishes two offices and a plurality of overseers, and the rest must be argued from the whole of Scripture, not read into two words.
Application Question 1: How do I treat the overseers and deacons of my congregation, and do I pray for them by name?
Answer: Paul greets the officers of the church together with the saints (v. 1), and the New Testament tells believers how to regard them: “respect those who labor among you and are over you in the Lord and admonish you, and … esteem them very highly in love because of their work” (1 Thessalonians 5:12–13). Elders and deacons are gifts of Christ to His church, and they carry a weight that is easy to overlook: they keep watch over souls “as those who will have to give an account” (Hebrews 13:17). Self-examination should ask whether we speak of them with honor or with casual criticism, whether we make their work “with joy and not with groaning” (Hebrews 13:17), whether we bring our needs to the deacons or hide them, and whether their names appear in our daily prayers. Paul himself asked for the prayers of the churches (Ephesians 6:19); the officers of a congregation need them no less.
Why is this question important? The health of a congregation rises and falls with the faithfulness of its officers, and a church that will not pray for its shepherds should not be surprised when they falter.
Application Question 2: If I am a man in the church, am I willing to consider whether Christ is calling me to serve as an overseer or a deacon?
Answer: The Philippian church had overseers and deacons within about a decade of its founding (v. 1); they came from the same converts who had once been merchants, jailers, and slaves. Scripture calls the desire for the office of overseer “a noble task” (1 Timothy 3:1) and lays out the qualifications for both offices in terms of character rather than status (1 Timothy 3:1–13; Titus 1:5–9). Office in Christ’s church is a calling to serve, not a promotion to be sought for its own sake. A man should ask whether he loves the flock, whether he is able to teach or to care, whether his household commends him, and whether the congregation’s elders recognize the gifts in him. He should also ask whether fear of the cost, rather than lack of gifts, is what holds him back. Christ supplies the church’s officers by calling ordinary men, and He will supply what they need (Philippians 4:19).
Why is this question important? Congregations suffer when qualified men decline to serve. The offices Paul greets here are Christ’s provision for His people, and they are filled only when men answer His call.
Deep Study Question 1: What does the plural “overseers” in a single congregation establish about the government of the church, and how does the rest of the New Testament confirm it?
Answer: Paul greets “the overseers” (v. 1), plural, of one city church. The pattern is consistent across the New Testament. Paul and Barnabas “appointed elders for them in every church” (Acts 14:23); Titus was to “appoint elders in every town” (Titus 1:5); the Ephesian church had “elders” whom the Spirit had made “overseers” (Acts 20:17, 28); James directs the sick to call “the elders of the church” (James 5:14); and Peter, “a fellow elder,” exhorts “the elders among you” to “shepherd the flock of God … exercising oversight” (1 Peter 5:1–2). Each congregation was governed by a plurality of elders, and elder and overseer were one office. There is no New Testament example of a single bishop ruling a church or a region. Plural oversight guards the flock against the errors and ambitions of any one man (3 John 9–10), distributes the weight of care, and reflects the fact that Christ alone is head of the church (Colossians 1:18).
Why is this question important? Church government is not indifferent. The offices Christ instituted are the means by which He rules and feeds His people, and departing from the biblical pattern has historically opened the door to both tyranny and neglect.
Deep Study Question 2: In what sense are the offices of overseer and deacon extensions of Christ’s own ministry?
Answer: Both titles are given to Christ before they are given to men. Peter calls Him “the Shepherd and Overseer of your souls” (1 Peter 2:25) and “the chief Shepherd” (1 Peter 5:4), and Paul says that “Christ became a servant to the circumcised” (Romans 15:8), using the word from which “deacon” derives. Jesus described His whole mission in those terms: “the Son of Man came not to be served but to serve, and to give his life as a ransom for many” (Mark 10:45). The overseer’s watchfulness and the deacon’s service are the two dimensions of Christ’s care, oversight of souls and provision for bodies. When He ascended He “gave … shepherds and teachers, to equip the saints” (Ephesians 4:11–12); the officers of the church are therefore His gifts, and their work is His work carried on through them. A faithful elder shows the flock the Shepherd; a faithful deacon shows the poor the Servant. That is why the qualifications for both are so heavily moral: the offices are meant to display Christ’s character, not merely to discharge functions.
Why is this question important? Understanding office as the shape of Christ’s ministry keeps church leaders humble and church members grateful, and it dignifies the diaconate as a true ministry of Christ rather than an administrative role.
Section 4 — Grace to You and Peace (Philippians 1:2)
Key Insight
The greeting ends with a blessing: “Grace to you and peace from God our Father and the Lord Jesus Christ” (v. 2). Paul uses this form in every letter, and its familiarity can make readers pass over it.
The ordinary Greek letter greeted its reader with chairein, “greetings” (Acts 15:23; James 1:1). Paul replaces it with a word that sounds almost the same and means infinitely more: grace, charis. The ordinary Jewish greeting was shalom, peace; Paul keeps it. The blessing binds a Greek word and a Hebrew word together, as the church at Philippi bound a Greek merchant and a Roman jailer, and turns a pleasantry into a prayer. Grace is God’s free favor to those who deserve the opposite; the Philippians are “partakers … of grace” (Philippians 1:7), and the letter will end as it began, “The grace of the Lord Jesus Christ be with your spirit” (Philippians 4:23). Peace is shalom: not merely the absence of conflict but wholeness, well-being, the condition of a life set right with God. It is peace with God, “since we have been justified by faith” (Romans 5:1); the peace of God, “which surpasses all understanding” (Philippians 4:7); and peace among God’s people, which the letter will urge upon Euodia and Syntyche (Philippians 4:2). John Piper has often noted the order: grace comes first because peace flows from it. No one has peace with God who has not first received His grace.
The source of the blessing is stated with care: “from God our Father and the Lord Jesus Christ.” One preposition, apo, governs both names. Grace and peace come from the Father and the Son together, as from a single fountain. Calvin observes that Paul here joins Christ with the Father as the author of these blessings, which no creature could bestow, and that this is a plain testimony to Christ’s divinity. The Father is “our Father,” the Father of all the saints; Jesus is “Lord,” kyrios, the name the Greek Old Testament gives to the LORD Himself, and the name Philippi gave to Caesar. In one short blessing Paul confesses the Father and the Son giving what only God can give, and quietly sets the Lord of the church above the lord of the empire.
The blessing is also the fulfillment of an ancient one. Israel’s priests were commanded to bless the people in these words: “The LORD bless you and keep you; the LORD make his face to shine upon you and be gracious to you; the LORD lift up his countenance upon you and give you peace” (Numbers 6:24–26). Grace and peace were always the substance of God’s blessing on His people. What Aaron pronounced in the tabernacle, Paul pronounces in Christ, because in Christ the blessing has been secured: “upon him was the chastisement that brought us peace” (Isaiah 53:5). He Himself is our peace (Ephesians 2:14), and “from his fullness we have all received, grace upon grace” (John 1:16).
Application
The first application is to receive what is given. Grace and peace are not achievements but gifts, and the Christian’s first daily act is to receive them again from the Father and the Son. Many believers live as though grace were the entrance to the Christian life and effort its continuation. Paul begins every letter with grace because the church lives on it from first to last. A believer who has sinned should go straight to the fountain rather than waiting until he feels worthy; a believer who is anxious should remember that the peace of God is given, and given “in Christ Jesus” (Philippians 4:7), not manufactured by circumstances.
The second application is to bless others as we have been blessed. Paul’s greeting was not a formality; it was a prayer for real people, and the church has always used such words in its worship. Christians may make the apostolic blessing their own: praying grace and peace over their children at night, over a friend in trouble, over the congregation in the benediction. The words shape those who use them. A household in which grace and peace are regularly spoken becomes a household in which they are more regularly seen.
The third application is to pursue peace among the saints. Peace from God is meant to become peace between His people. The letter’s later plea to two women “to agree in the Lord” (Philippians 4:2) is the outworking of this greeting. Where believers are estranged, this verse calls them to remember that they have received the same grace from the same Father and the same Lord.
A warning against misapplication: grace must not be cheapened into leniency, as though God’s free favor left sin unaddressed, nor peace reduced to a feeling that circumstances can supply. The grace Paul invokes cost the blood of Christ, and the peace it brings is first peace with God through justification, from which peace of conscience and peace with others follow. To seek the feeling without the reconciliation is to cry “Peace, peace,” when there is no peace (Jeremiah 6:14).
Application Question 1: Do I begin each day by receiving grace and peace from God as gifts, or by trying to earn them?
Answer: Paul’s greeting places grace and peace at the head of the letter as things given “from God our Father and the Lord Jesus Christ” (v. 2), before any instruction or exhortation. That order is the shape of the Christian life. Grace is received, never earned, for “by grace you have been saved through faith. And this is not your own doing; it is the gift of God” (Ephesians 2:8). Peace likewise is a gift of the risen Christ: “Peace I leave with you; my peace I give to you” (John 14:27). Self-examination asks how we approach God in the morning: as servants reporting for inspection, or as children coming to a Father who has already declared Himself for us in Christ. The believer who begins with gift ends with obedience; the believer who begins with effort ends with exhaustion. The practical discipline is simple: before the day’s demands, to rehearse the gospel and to ask, in Paul’s own words, for grace and peace.
Why is this question important? How we begin shapes how we go on. A life that starts each day in received grace is protected from both pride and despair, the two ditches on either side of the Christian road.
Application Question 2: Is there a fellow believer with whom I need to make peace, since we have both received grace and peace from the same Father and Lord?
Answer: The peace Paul pronounces on “all the saints” (v. 2) is meant to be visible among them, and the letter will later name two women who had not yet made it visible (Philippians 4:2). Peace received from God obligates peace pursued with His people. Jesus taught that reconciliation with a brother takes precedence even over worship (Matthew 5:23–24), and Paul commands, “If possible, so far as it depends on you, live peaceably with all” (Romans 12:18). The self-examination is concrete: is there a name that comes to mind, a conversation avoided, a grievance nursed? To withhold peace from one to whom God has given grace is to deny the grace we ourselves received. The step may be a letter, a visit, an apology, or the forgiveness of a wrong never acknowledged; but it should be taken, “bearing with one another and … forgiving each other; as the Lord has forgiven you” (Colossians 3:13).
Why is this question important? Division among the saints contradicts the greeting they share. The credibility of the gospel in a city like Philippi depends on the peace of the church, and the same is true in every city since.
Deep Study Question 1: What does the single preposition “from” governing both “God our Father” and “the Lord Jesus Christ” teach about the deity of Christ and the doctrine of the Trinity?
Answer: Paul writes that grace and peace come “from God our Father and the Lord Jesus Christ” (v. 2), placing the Son alongside the Father as the joint source of blessings that only God can give. No Jew trained as Paul was would have named a creature beside the LORD as the giver of grace and peace, the very substance of the priestly blessing (Numbers 6:24–26). The grammar of the greeting is a confession of Christ’s deity. The same pattern appears throughout Paul: “the grace of the Lord Jesus Christ and the love of God and the fellowship of the Holy Spirit” (2 Corinthians 13:14); “our great God and Savior Jesus Christ” (Titus 2:13); and the confession this letter will make, that “Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father” (Philippians 2:11). The Father and the Son are distinct persons, for the Father is Father and the Son is Lord, and yet they act as one in giving. The Trinity is not a later invention but the grammar of apostolic prayer; the Spirit, who gives the peace that is His fruit (Galatians 5:22), is present in the letter’s next chapter as the “participation in the Spirit” (Philippians 2:1).
Why is this question important? Christians pray to a triune God or they do not pray to the God of Scripture, and the greeting shows that this doctrine was assumed in the church’s earliest worship rather than argued into it.
Deep Study Question 2: How does Paul’s “grace and peace” fulfill the Aaronic blessing of Numbers 6, and what does that fulfillment reveal about Christ?
Answer: The priestly blessing asked the LORD to “be gracious to you” and to “give you peace” (Numbers 6:25–26), and it was pronounced over Israel by Aaron’s sons as a putting of God’s name upon the people (Numbers 6:27). Paul’s greeting carries the same two gifts and the same divine source, but it names the Lord Jesus Christ with the Father (v. 2). What the old covenant priest could only pronounce, the new covenant Priest has secured. Christ is the One on whom “was the chastisement that brought us peace” (Isaiah 53:5), the Prince of Peace foretold by Isaiah (Isaiah 9:6), and the One who “made peace by the blood of his cross” (Colossians 1:20). Grace, likewise, is not merely a disposition in God but a gift accomplished in history: “grace and truth came through Jesus Christ” (John 1:17). Every apostolic greeting is therefore a benediction pronounced in the finished work of Christ. The risen Lord’s first word to His gathered disciples was “Peace be with you” (John 20:19), and the church has been repeating it ever since.
Why is this question important? Seeing the greeting as fulfilled benediction unites the Testaments around Christ and teaches the church that its benedictions are not wishes but declarations of what God has done.
Cross References
Comparative Gospel Study
Not Applicable as Direct Comparison — Philippians is a New Testament epistle, not Gospel narrative. However, Philippians 1:1–2 anticipates key Gospel themes:
- The Servant who came to serve. Paul and Timothy’s title, “servants of Christ Jesus” (v. 1), echoes the Lord’s own account of His mission: “the Son of Man came not to be served but to serve, and to give his life as a ransom for many” (Mark 10:45). Jesus washed His disciples’ feet and told them, “you also ought to wash one another’s feet” (John 13:14). The apostles’ servanthood is the pattern of the Master carried into the church.
- A people called without distinction. “All the saints” (v. 1) reflects the Gospels’ picture of a Savior who called tax collectors and fishermen alike, who welcomed “all who labor and are heavy laden” (Matthew 11:28), and who prayed that all who believe “may all be one” (John 17:20–21). The church at Philippi, made of a merchant, a jailer, and a slave, is that prayer answered.
- Shepherds under the Chief Shepherd. The overseers of v. 1 stand in the place the risen Lord gave to Peter: “Feed my lambs … Tend my sheep” (John 21:15–17). Jesus saw the crowds “like sheep without a shepherd” (Matthew 9:36) and told His disciples that “the leader” must be “as one who serves” (Luke 22:26). Overseers and deacons are the answer to His compassion and the embodiment of His rule.
- Peace given by the risen Lord. Paul’s “peace” (v. 2) is the peace Jesus promised in the upper room, “Peace I leave with you; my peace I give to you” (John 14:27), and pronounced on Easter evening, “Peace be with you” (John 20:19). The angels sang of it at His birth (Luke 2:14). The apostolic greeting is the risen Christ’s own greeting extended to His churches.
- Grace through Jesus Christ. “Grace to you” (v. 2) rests on John’s testimony that “from his fullness we have all received, grace upon grace,” for “grace and truth came through Jesus Christ” (John 1:16–17). The Gospels show grace in action: a prodigal received, a thief pardoned, a denier restored. Paul names as the church’s inheritance what the Gospels narrate as the Savior’s ministry.
- The Father and the Son as one source. The joint source of blessing in v. 2 recalls Jesus’ claims that “I and the Father are one” (John 10:30), that “whoever has seen me has seen the Father” (John 14:9), and that all should “honor the Son, just as they honor the Father” (John 5:23). What Jesus asserted in the Gospels, Paul assumes in a greeting.
Old Testament Connections
Pentateuch. Israel’s constitution as a holy people at Sinai (Exodus 19:5–6) is the root of Paul’s “saints.” The command “be holy, for I am holy” (Leviticus 11:44–45) shows that conferred holiness calls for a holy life. The LORD’s self-revelation as “merciful and gracious” (Exodus 34:6) is the source of the grace Paul invokes. The Aaronic blessing (Numbers 6:24–26), with its “be gracious to you … and give you peace,” is the direct ancestor of “grace to you and peace.” Moses’ title, “the servant of the LORD” (Deuteronomy 34:5), stands behind “servants of Christ Jesus.” The appointment of elders to share Moses’ burden (Numbers 11:16–17) and of Levites to serve the tabernacle (Numbers 3:5–10) foreshadows the two offices of oversight and service.
Historical Books. Joshua dies as “the servant of the LORD” (Joshua 24:29), and David is repeatedly “my servant David” (2 Samuel 7:5, 8). Samuel’s “Speak, LORD, for your servant hears” (1 Samuel 3:9–10) models the posture of Christ’s servants. The elders of Israel who governed cities and judged at the gate (Deuteronomy 21:19; Ruth 4:2) are the ancestors of the church’s overseers. Solomon’s name and reign of peace (1 Chronicles 22:9) anticipate the Prince of Peace.
Wisdom Literature. “As for the saints in the land, they are the excellent ones” (Psalm 16:3) uses the term Paul adopts for the church. Psalm 85 unites the greeting’s two gifts: the LORD “will speak peace to his people, to his saints,” and “righteousness and peace kiss each other” (Psalm 85:8, 10). “I have made a covenant with my chosen one; I have sworn to David my servant” (Psalm 89:3) joins servanthood to covenant. Psalm 133 celebrates the unity of brothers dwelling together, the unity Paul’s “all” seeks. “I am your servant; give me understanding” (Psalm 119:125) is the prayer of every doulos Christou.
Major Prophets. Isaiah’s Servant songs (Isaiah 42:1–4; 49:1–6; 52:13–53:12) supply the title Paul takes and the Person he serves; “upon him was the chastisement that brought us peace” (Isaiah 53:5) is the ground of the greeting’s peace. The Prince of Peace (Isaiah 9:6), the “covenant of peace” that “shall not be removed” (Isaiah 54:10), and “Peace, peace, to the far and to the near” (Isaiah 57:19) all lie behind “peace … from God.” Jeremiah’s new covenant, “I will be their God, and they shall be my people” (Jeremiah 31:33), is realized in “saints in Christ Jesus,” and his instruction to “seek the welfare of the city” of exile (Jeremiah 29:7) is the posture of saints who are “at Philippi.” Ezekiel’s promise of “one shepherd, my servant David” and a “covenant of peace” (Ezekiel 34:23–25; 37:26) is fulfilled in the Shepherd and Overseer of souls. Daniel’s vision of “the saints of the Most High” receiving the kingdom (Daniel 7:18, 22, 27) supplies the title Paul gives the church; the saints at Philippi are their heirs.
Minor Prophets. “The Lord GOD does nothing without revealing his secret to his servants the prophets” (Amos 3:7) places the apostles’ title in the prophetic line. “My servant the Branch” (Zechariah 3:8) names the Messiah with Paul’s word. Micah says of the coming ruler, “he shall be their peace” (Micah 5:5), and Haggai promises, “in this place I will give peace” (Haggai 2:9), promises kept in Christ.
New Testament Fulfillment
Gospels/Acts. The founding of the Philippian church (Acts 16:11–40) gives the greeting its faces: Lydia, the slave girl, the jailer. The Jerusalem council’s letter (Acts 15:23) shows the bare Greek greeting Paul transforms. The identity of elders and overseers is fixed by Acts 20:17 and 28, and the appointment of elders in every church by Acts 14:23; the seven of Acts 6:1–6 are the prototype of the diaconate. The Gospels give the Servant (Mark 10:45; John 13:1–17), the peace of the risen Lord (Luke 24:36; John 20:19–21), and the unity of the Father and the Son (John 10:30; 14:9).
Paul’s Epistles. Romans 1:1 and 1:7 pair “servant of Christ Jesus” with “called to be saints” and the identical blessing; 1 Corinthians 1:2 shows that even the Corinthians were “sanctified in Christ Jesus, called to be saints.” Romans 5:1 grounds peace in justification; Romans 15:8 calls Christ a servant; Galatians 1:10 makes servanthood the test of ministry; 2 Corinthians 4:5 defines apostolic ministry as “your servants for Jesus’ sake.” Ephesians 2:14–19 makes Christ “our peace” and Gentiles “fellow citizens with the saints”; Ephesians 4:11–12 gives officers as Christ’s gifts; 1 Timothy 3:1–13 and Titus 1:5–9 set out the qualifications of overseers and deacons; Colossians 1:2 and 2 Thessalonians 1:2 repeat the greeting; 2 Corinthians 13:14 expands it into the fully trinitarian benediction. Within Philippians itself, 2:5–11 (the form of a servant, the name of Lord), 3:20 (citizenship in heaven), 4:2–3 (peace among the saints), 4:7 and 4:9 (the peace of God, the God of peace), and 4:23 (the closing grace) all unfold the greeting.
General Epistles/Revelation. James 1:1 and Jude 1 open with “servant”; 2 Peter 1:1–2 pairs “servant” with “grace and peace be multiplied,” as does 1 Peter 1:2. First Peter 2:25 calls Christ “the Shepherd and Overseer of your souls,” and 1 Peter 5:1–4 addresses elders as shepherds under “the chief Shepherd.” First Peter 2:9 transfers Israel’s titles, “a holy nation,” to Gentile believers. Hebrews 13:17 commands submission to leaders who watch over souls, and Hebrews 13:20–21 blesses the church in the name of “the God of peace” and “the great shepherd of the sheep.” Revelation 1:1 introduces John as Christ’s “servant,” Revelation 1:4–5 offers grace and peace from the triune God, and Revelation 22:3–4 shows the end of the story: “his servants will worship him. They will see his face.”
Redemptive-Historical Context
The greeting of Philippians is a small window onto the whole arc of redemption, from creation to consummation.
Creation. God made humanity to serve Him in glad dependence, to bear His image in a world of shalom, and to live in ordered fellowship under His rule. The “servants,” “saints,” and “peace” of the greeting are creational words before they are redemptive ones: Adam was placed in the garden “to work it and keep it” (Genesis 2:15), a servant of the LORD in a world at peace, holy because God had set it apart and rested in it.
Fall. Sin inverted every term. Man sought to be his own master and became a slave of sin (John 8:34). The holy became defiled; peace with God gave way to enmity, and peace among men to murder within a generation (Genesis 4:8). The order of creation became domination. “There is no peace,” the LORD says, “for the wicked” (Isaiah 57:21). Paul’s greeting is addressed to people who were once in this condition, “dead in … trespasses and sins” (Ephesians 2:1).
Redemption. God’s answer was covenant. He called Abraham and promised a people; at Sinai He made Israel “a kingdom of priests and a holy nation” (Exodus 19:6), gave them elders and priests, and had Aaron bless them with grace and peace (Numbers 6:24–26). He raised up servants, Moses, David, and the prophets, and through Isaiah He promised the Servant who would bear the sins of many and establish a covenant of peace (Isaiah 53; 54:10). In the fullness of time the Son of God “emptied himself, by taking the form of a servant” (Philippians 2:7), obeyed to the point of death on a cross, and was exalted as Lord (Philippians 2:8–11). In Him grace has appeared (Titus 2:11) and peace has been made (Colossians 1:20). The Spirit poured out at Pentecost has gathered a people from every nation, and by the time Paul writes, that people includes a congregation in a Roman colony in Macedonia, addressed with Israel’s own title, “saints,” and ordered under overseers and deacons as Israel was under elders and Levites. The greeting is the new covenant in miniature: a holy people, in Christ, blessed by the Father and the Son.
Consummation. The greeting is also unfinished. The saints are still “at Philippi,” in a city that belongs to Caesar, and the apostle who blesses them is in chains. The peace they receive guards their hearts but does not yet end their conflicts (Philippians 1:29–30). Paul will tell them that “our citizenship is in heaven, and from it we await a Savior, the Lord Jesus Christ” (Philippians 3:20), who will transform their lowly bodies. The end of the story is the end of the greeting: “his servants will worship him. They will see his face” (Revelation 22:3–4), in the city whose peace is never broken, where “the dwelling place of God is with man” (Revelation 21:3).
Already and not yet. The Philippians are already saints and not yet perfected; already at peace with God and not yet at peace with the world; already in Christ and still in Philippi. This tension is not a defect of the gospel but its present shape. The grace that began the work “will bring it to completion at the day of Jesus Christ” (Philippians 1:6). Every Christian who reads the greeting stands where the Philippians stood, in Christ and in his own city, blessed by the Father and the Son, and waiting for the Savior from heaven.
Systematic Theology Connection
Union with Christ
The phrase “saints in Christ Jesus” (v. 1) rests on the doctrine that the Westminster Larger Catechism calls the believer’s union with Christ: “the work of God’s grace, whereby they are spiritually and mystically, yet really and inseparably, joined to Christ as their head and husband” (WLC 66). The passage teaches the doctrine by presupposing it. The Philippians are not merely saints who believe in Christ; they are saints in Him, located within Him as a branch is in the vine (John 15:4–5). Their holiness, their unity, and the grace and peace they receive are all theirs by virtue of this union. The Westminster Shorter Catechism makes union the channel of every benefit: the Spirit applies redemption “by working faith in us, and thereby uniting us to Christ in our effectual calling” (WSC 30), and the Confession adds that all saints, “being united to Jesus Christ their head, by his Spirit, and by faith, have fellowship with him in his graces, sufferings, death, resurrection, and glory” (WCF 26.1). Paul’s letter bears this out in detail: he wants to “be found in him” (Philippians 3:9), to know “the fellowship of his sufferings” (Philippians 3:10), and to be conformed to His glorious body (Philippians 3:21). The practical implications are far-reaching. Assurance rests not on the strength of our faith but on the One to whom faith unites us. Sanctification is not imitation from a distance but growth in a life already shared. Prayer is offered “in Christ,” worship is gathered “in Christ,” and death itself is “to depart and be with Christ” (Philippians 1:23). The believer who grasps that he is in Christ knows that nothing “will be able to separate us from the love of God in Christ Jesus our Lord” (Romans 8:39), and that his two addresses, in Christ and in his own city, are not in competition, because the first governs the second.
Effectual Calling and Sanctification
“Saints” (v. 1) is a word of calling. Paul’s fuller phrase elsewhere is “called to be saints” (Romans 1:7; 1 Corinthians 1:2), and it reflects the doctrine that God, “in his appointed and accepted time,” effectually calls those He has predestined “out of that state of sin and death … to grace and salvation by Jesus Christ” (WCF 10.1). The Philippians became saints not by their own choosing but because “the Lord opened” Lydia’s heart (Acts 16:14) and a jailer was brought trembling to faith. The Shorter Catechism defines effectual calling as the Spirit’s work “convincing us of our sin and misery, enlightening our minds in the knowledge of Christ, and renewing our wills” (WSC 31), and the letter’s confidence that “he who began a good work in you will bring it to completion” (Philippians 1:6) is the confidence that God’s calling is effectual and His work certain. The same word, “saints,” also names the doctrine of sanctification, in both its definitive and its progressive aspects. Definitively, believers “were washed … sanctified … justified” (1 Corinthians 6:11), set apart to God once for all in Christ. Progressively, they “are further sanctified, really and personally, through the virtue of Christ’s death and resurrection” (WCF 13.1), so that “the whole man” is “more and more” enabled to practice holiness (WSC 35). Paul will pray precisely for this growth, that the Philippians’ love may “abound more and more” and that they may be “pure and blameless for the day of Christ” (Philippians 1:9–10). The practical implication is the gospel order of status and conduct. Believers pursue holiness because they are holy, working out “with fear and trembling” the salvation God works in them (Philippians 2:12–13). Legalism reverses the order and produces anxiety; antinomianism drops the second half and produces presumption; the apostolic pattern produces grateful obedience.
The Nature and Government of the Church
The address “to all the saints … with the overseers and deacons” (v. 1) is a compact doctrine of the church. The Confession describes the visible church as consisting “of all those throughout the world that profess the true religion; and of their children,” and calls it “the house and family of God” (WCF 25.2). The greeting shows that household at Philippi: a whole congregation of saints, without ranks among them, together with the officers who serve them. The Confession further teaches that “the Lord Jesus, as King and Head of his church, hath therein appointed a government, in the hand of church officers, distinct from the civil magistrate” (WCF 30.1). Philippians 1:1 is one of the principal texts behind that statement, and the Westminster Assembly’s Form of Presbyterial Church Government cited it in establishing both the office of deacon and the plurality of pastors in a single congregation. The plural “overseers” in one church, together with the New Testament’s use of “overseer” and “elder” for the same office (Acts 20:17, 28; Titus 1:5–7), grounds the Presbyterian conviction that congregations are governed by a plurality of elders equal in office, under Christ the only Head (Colossians 1:18), rather than by a single bishop. The pairing of overseers with deacons distinguishes the ministry of oversight and teaching from the ministry of mercy (Acts 6:2–4; 1 Timothy 3:1–13). The practical implications are several. Members should honor the church’s officers as Christ’s gifts (Ephesians 4:11–12) and submit to their care (Hebrews 13:17). Officers should remember that they are among the saints, not above them, and serve as under-shepherds of the chief Shepherd (1 Peter 5:1–4). And the whole church should recognize that its order is not a human convenience but part of Christ’s provision for the holiness and unity of His people, “so that we may no longer be children, tossed to and fro” (Ephesians 4:14).
The Trinity and the Deity of Christ
“Grace to you and peace from God our Father and the Lord Jesus Christ” (v. 2) is a trinitarian confession in the form of a blessing. The Confession teaches that “in the unity of the Godhead there be three persons, of one substance, power, and eternity: God the Father, God the Son, and God the Holy Ghost” (WCF 2.3), and the Larger Catechism adds that the Son and the Spirit are “God, equal with the Father” (WLC 11). Paul’s greeting shows this doctrine at work in apostolic prayer. A single preposition joins the Father and the Son as the one source of grace and peace, gifts that only God can give and that the Old Testament reserved to the LORD (Numbers 6:24–26). The Son is called “Lord,” the Septuagint’s rendering of the divine name, and the letter will shortly confess that at His name every knee shall bow (Philippians 2:10–11), applying to Jesus the words the LORD spoke of Himself (Isaiah 45:23). The Spirit, though unnamed in the greeting, is present in the letter as the One in whom the saints share (Philippians 2:1) and worship (Philippians 3:3), and Paul’s fuller benediction names all three (2 Corinthians 13:14). The Confession’s statement that Christ, “being very and eternal God, of one substance and equal with the Father,” took human nature so that “two whole, perfect, and distinct natures … were inseparably joined together in one person” (WCF 8.2), is the doctrinal foundation of the letter’s great hymn (Philippians 2:6–8). The practical implications are for worship and assurance. Christians pray to the Father through the Son by the Spirit, and they may address the Son as fully as the Father, for He gives what God gives. And because the grace and peace of the greeting come from God Himself, they are as certain as He is. No lesser source could guarantee them; the believer’s peace rests on the character of the triune God.
The Covenant of Grace
The greeting’s two gifts, grace and peace, are the substance of the covenant of grace, which the Confession describes as the covenant in which the Lord “freely offereth unto sinners life and salvation by Jesus Christ” (WCF 7.3). The Larger Catechism states that this covenant was made “with Christ as the second Adam, and in him with all the elect as his seed” (WLC 31), and that its grace is manifested in the giving of “the promise of life and salvation” and “the Holy Spirit to all his elect, to work in them that faith” (WLC 32). Every element of the greeting is covenantal. “Servants of Christ Jesus” places Paul and Timothy in the line of covenant servants from Moses to the prophets. “Saints” is Israel’s covenant title (Exodus 19:6), now borne by Gentiles in Christ. “Grace and peace” is the Aaronic covenant blessing (Numbers 6:24–26), pronounced now by an apostle rather than a priest because the covenant has reached its fulfillment in the Mediator. The Confession notes that the covenant of grace “was differently administered in the time of the law, and in the time of the gospel,” yet is “one and the same” in substance (WCF 7.5–6); the greeting is a specimen of the gospel administration, in which the blessing once pronounced in the tabernacle is pronounced in Christ over a church in Macedonia. The Shorter Catechism lists the benefits that flow from this covenant in this life: “assurance of God’s love, peace of conscience, joy in the Holy Ghost, increase of grace, and perseverance therein to the end” (WSC 36), a list that reads almost as a summary of Philippians. The practical implication is that believers approach God as a covenant God who has bound Himself by promise. Grace is not a mood that may change but a covenant pledge; peace is not a fragile feeling but a covenant condition secured by the blood of Christ (Hebrews 13:20). The Philippians could count on grace and peace because God had sworn them, and so may every saint who is in Christ.
Reformed Theology
Reformed theology reads Philippians 1:1–2 as a doorway into the covenant of grace as it is administered in the new covenant church.
The covenant people. The word “saints” carries the whole history of God’s covenant with His people. Geerhardus Vos taught that the church of the New Testament is not a new entity but the covenant people of God in its eschatological form, the Israel of the age to come that has already arrived in Christ. G. K. Beale has developed this at length: the church is the true Israel because it is united to the true Israel, Jesus Christ, and Israel’s titles, “saints,” “holy nation,” “royal priesthood,” are the church’s by right of that union, not by usurpation. The Gentile congregation at Philippi is thus the direct heir of the “saints of the Most High” (Daniel 7:18), and the Westminster Confession’s insistence that the covenant of grace is “one and the same” under both administrations (WCF 7.6) is confirmed by the way Paul greets a Roman colony with Israel’s own vocabulary.
The church ordered by Christ. The Reformed tradition has found in “the overseers and deacons” the biblical warrant for its polity. Calvin argued from this verse, together with Acts 20 and Titus 1, that Scripture uses bishop, presbyter, and pastor interchangeably (Institutes 4.3.8), and the Westminster Form of Presbyterial Church Government followed him, citing Philippians 1:1 for the plurality of pastors in one congregation and for the office of deacon. The Confession’s doctrine that Christ has “appointed a government, in the hand of church officers” (WCF 30.1) means that Presbyterian order is not a matter of preference but of fidelity to Christ’s kingship. Meredith Kline stressed that the church is the covenant community in which the kingdom of God is presently administered, and that its offices are the ordained instruments of Christ’s rule until He comes. Sinclair Ferguson stresses the pastoral heart of this: elders and deacons are the shape of Christ’s shepherding and serving.
Grace and peace as covenant blessing. The Reformed reading of “grace to you and peace” begins with Calvin’s observation that Paul places Christ beside the Father as the giver of what only God gives, and it proceeds to the typology of the Aaronic benediction: the blessing Aaron pronounced is now pronounced in Christ, who has secured it. R. C. Sproul insisted that peace with God is the fruit of justification and nothing else, and that the church’s peace begins at the cross. D. A. Carson observes that the Philippians’ partnership was a partnership in the gospel, so that grace and peace define what holds the church together. John Piper draws the practical line: because grace precedes peace, the Christian life is lived by receiving before doing. Charles Spurgeon preached the greeting as a benediction to be believed, not merely heard, and gloried in the title “servant of Christ” as the highest a man can bear.
Typology and the servant. Finally, Reformed theology sees in “servants of Christ Jesus” a typological line running from Moses through David and the prophets to Isaiah’s Servant, fulfilled in Christ and shared by His apostles. Paul’s title is a confession of Christ’s deity, since Christ now stands where the LORD stood, and of Christ’s humiliation, since the Master took the form of a servant (Philippians 2:7). The greeting thus already contains the letter’s central movement, from the form of a servant to the name that is above every name, and it invites every church to find its identity, its order, and its peace in Him.
Dispensational Theology
Dispensational interpreters read Philippians 1:1–2 with the same literal-grammatical care as Reformed interpreters; the differences emerge where the greeting touches the identity of the church.
The church as a distinct body. For classical dispensationalism, the church addressed here is a body that began at Pentecost and is distinct from Israel. C. I. Scofield’s notes distinguished the church, “the body of Christ,” from Israel as an earthly nation with earthly promises, and Charles Ryrie made the Israel-church distinction the first of dispensationalism’s essential marks. On this reading, the “saints in Christ Jesus who are at Philippi” (v. 1) are members of the church, the “mystery” body revealed to Paul (Ephesians 3:3–6), in which Jew and Gentile are joined on equal terms in a way never true of Israel. The phrase “in Christ Jesus” is central to the dispensational understanding of the church age: it names the baptism of the Spirit into the body of Christ that began at Pentecost and marks off this dispensation from every other. Lewis Sperry Chafer and John Walvoord developed this into a doctrine of the church as a heavenly people distinct from Israel as an earthly people, and Walvoord’s exposition of Philippians reads “saints” as the positional standing of every believer in this age.
“Saints” and the saints of Daniel. Here the readings diverge sharply. Dispensational interpreters generally decline to see the “saints of the Most High” of Daniel 7 as fulfilled in the church; those saints, they hold, are Israel in the coming kingdom, and the church’s title is a parallel rather than a fulfillment. J. Dwight Pentecost kept the promises to national Israel intact for a future millennial kingdom, so that the church’s holiness in Philippians 1:1 does not transfer Israel’s national promises to it. Progressive dispensationalists such as Craig Blaising and Darrell Bock soften this: they grant that the church already participates in the new covenant and its blessings, including the grace and peace of the greeting, while still expecting a future fulfillment of national promises to Israel. For all dispensationalists the greeting’s “grace and peace” belongs to the dispensation of grace (Ephesians 3:2).
Church order. On “overseers and deacons” dispensational commentators such as Homer Kent and Robert Lightner agree with the Reformed reading in substance: the terms “overseer” and “elder” are interchangeable, each congregation had a plurality of elders, and deacons formed a distinct office. Dispensationalists tend to draw from this the independence of the local church under its own officers rather than a connectional presbytery, but the exegesis itself is largely shared. The greeting’s “from God our Father and the Lord Jesus Christ” is read, in dispensational as in Reformed exposition, as an affirmation of Christ’s full deity.
A Reformed response. The Reformed reader affirms the dispensationalist’s literal reading of the greeting, its confession of Christ’s deity, and its recognition of the two offices. The point of dissent is the church’s relation to Israel. Paul does not address the Philippians with a new vocabulary invented for a new body; he addresses them with Israel’s vocabulary, “saints,” and with Israel’s blessing, “grace and peace,” as though the promises made to Israel had reached their goal in this Gentile congregation. Elsewhere he says so plainly: believers are “fellow citizens with the saints” (Ephesians 2:19) and “Abraham’s offspring, heirs according to promise” (Galatians 3:29). The one people of God, promised to Abraham, constituted at Sinai, foreseen by Daniel, and gathered in Christ, is the people Paul greets at Philippi. Progressive dispensationalism’s recognition that the church already shares the new covenant is, from the Reformed side, a welcome step toward that conclusion.
Bibliography
Commentaries
- Calvin, John. Commentaries on the Epistles of Paul to the Philippians, Colossians, and Thessalonians. Translated by John Pringle. Edinburgh: Calvin Translation Society, 1851.
- Chrysostom, John. Homilies on the Epistle of St. Paul to the Philippians. In Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, First Series, vol. 13.
- Fee, Gordon D. Paul’s Letter to the Philippians. New International Commentary on the New Testament. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1995.
- Ferguson, Sinclair B. Let’s Study Philippians. Edinburgh: Banner of Truth, 1997.
- Hansen, G. Walter. The Letter to the Philippians. Pillar New Testament Commentary. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2009.
- Hendriksen, William. Exposition of Philippians. New Testament Commentary. Grand Rapids: Baker, 1962.
- Henry, Matthew. Commentary on the Whole Bible. Vol. 6. Peabody, MA: Hendrickson, 1991.
- Kent, Homer A., Jr. “Philippians.” In The Expositor’s Bible Commentary, vol. 11. Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1978.
- Lightfoot, J. B. Saint Paul’s Epistle to the Philippians. London: Macmillan, 1868.
- Lightner, Robert P. “Philippians.” In The Bible Knowledge Commentary: New Testament. Wheaton: Victor, 1983.
- O’Brien, Peter T. The Epistle to the Philippians. New International Greek Testament Commentary. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1991.
- Poole, Matthew. A Commentary on the Holy Bible. Vol. 3. Edinburgh: Banner of Truth, 1963.
- Silva, Moisés. Philippians. 2nd ed. Baker Exegetical Commentary on the New Testament. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2005.
- Walvoord, John F. Philippians: Triumph in Christ. Chicago: Moody, 1971.
Theological and Biblical-Theological Works
- Bavinck, Herman. Reformed Dogmatics. Vol. 4, Holy Spirit, Church, and New Creation. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2008.
- Beale, G. K. A New Testament Biblical Theology: The Unfolding of the Old Testament in the New. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2011.
- Blaising, Craig A., and Darrell L. Bock. Progressive Dispensationalism. Grand Rapids: Baker, 1993.
- Calvin, John. Institutes of the Christian Religion. Edited by John T. McNeill. Translated by Ford Lewis Battles. Philadelphia: Westminster, 1960.
- Carson, D. A. Basics for Believers: An Exposition of Philippians. Grand Rapids: Baker, 1996.
- Chafer, Lewis Sperry. Systematic Theology. Dallas: Dallas Seminary Press, 1948.
- Kline, Meredith G. Kingdom Prologue: Genesis Foundations for a Covenantal Worldview. Overland Park, KS: Two Age Press, 2000.
- Pentecost, J. Dwight. The Joy of Living: A Study of Philippians. Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1973.
- Pentecost, J. Dwight. Things to Come: A Study in Biblical Eschatology. Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1958.
- Piper, John. Future Grace. Sisters, OR: Multnomah, 1995.
- Ridderbos, Herman. Paul: An Outline of His Theology. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1975.
- Ryrie, Charles C. Dispensationalism. Rev. ed. Chicago: Moody, 2007.
- Scofield, C. I., ed. The Scofield Reference Bible. New York: Oxford University Press, 1917.
- Sproul, R. C. The Holiness of God. Wheaton: Tyndale, 1985.
- Spurgeon, Charles H. The Metropolitan Tabernacle Pulpit. London: Passmore and Alabaster, 1855–1917.
- Vos, Geerhardus. Biblical Theology: Old and New Testaments. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1948.
- Walvoord, John F. The Millennial Kingdom. Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1959.
Historical Background
- Bruce, F. F. The Book of the Acts. Rev. ed. New International Commentary on the New Testament. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1988.
- Polycarp of Smyrna. Epistle to the Philippians. In The Apostolic Fathers, edited and translated by Michael W. Holmes. 3rd ed. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2007.
Confessional Standards
- The Westminster Confession of Faith (1646).
- The Westminster Larger Catechism (1647).
- The Westminster Shorter Catechism (1647).
- The Form of Presbyterial Church Government (1645).

Leave a Reply